Close Menu

2024 Bordeaux en primeur tasting notes by Colin Hay

Bordeaux blanc

Aile d’Argent
Aile d’Argent (Bordeaux blanc; 54.5% Sauvignon Blanc; 33% Sémillon; 12.5% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield that was good considering the age of vines; pH 3.05; 6.5% malolactic fermentation; 12.8% alcohol; tasted with Jean-Emmanuel Danjoy at Château Mouton-Rothschild). Lovely floral aromatics and a freshness that used never to be very present in this wine. Bright, crisp, dynamic and very lifted. A wine of incredible impact, intensity and purity. We talk often of the acidity cutting the far, here the richness prevents the acidity from dominating, giving it a frame. Fresh and fluid and radiantly vivid and vibrant. Linden. Peach. Pear. Elderflower. White grapefruit. Guava. So divinely glassy and crystalline in texture. Wondrous, and so different to how it used to be. 94-96
Blanc de Chateau d’Issan
Blanc de Chateau d’Issan (Bordeaux blanc; 35% Viognier; 35% Rousanne; 20% Marsanne; 10% Rolle; pH 3.2; 13.2% alcohol; tasted at Château d’Issan with Augustin Lacaille). The limestone terroir is crucial here. Lithe and gracious and super expressive in this vintage. Wax. Peach. Nectarine. Lime and lemon juice. White pear. A touch of lime. A hint of ginger. Despite the varietals, the signature element here is the vertical freshness very well distributed and stretching the wine from top to bottom. Blood orange and mandarin zest. Pink grapefruit with a gentle creaminess. A hint of honey. 92-94.
Blanc de Lynch-Bages
Blanc de Lynch-Bages (Bordeaux blanc; 77% Sauvignon Blanc; 12% Muscadelle; 11% Sémillon; pH 3.12; aged in oak barrles, 50% of them new; 12.5% alcohol; tasted at Lynch-Bages with Jean-Charles Cazes). White grapefruit, confit melon and lemon, gooseberry, a touch of linden and some juicy exotic fruit notes too – passionfruit and passionflower. White current. A lovely trace of tannin on the finish that I really love and that seals the deal. Sapid and intensely juicy. Honestly, this is excellent, the oak seamlessly integrated. 92-94
Blanc Sec de Lafaurie-Peyraguey
Blanc Sec de Lafaurie-Peyraguey (Bordeaux blanc; 60% Sauvignon Blanc; 40% Sémillon; Valérie Lavigne and Axel Marchal is the consultant here). Beautifully chiselled. 50 shades of citrus, linden and lime. So clear, eloquent, crunchy, bright and crystalline. A touch of wild strawberry and a hint of lanolin. The acidity scrunches the wine as if to squeeze out of it the acidity and that achieves a wondrous tactile contact with the mouth – and hence dynamism. Like an inverted pyramid, with lovely traces of tannin that, with the acidity, pull this towards the base of the mouth. Brilliantly structured and dynamic. Fabulously refreshing. 93-95
Château Cos d’Estournel blanc
Château Cos d’Estournel blanc (Bordeaux; 60% Sauvignon Blanc; 40% Sémillon; pH 3.07; aging in oak barrels, 8% of them new; 12.2% alcohol; tasted with Dominique Arangoits at Cos). Almost Sauternais in terms of its aromatics. Lanolin. Peach, pear, yuzu, elderberry and jasmine. A little ginger, freshly grated, and lemongrass too. This is a study in tension – between the colossal horizontal range and the acidity that seeks to demolish it vertically (Dominique Arangoits laughs at the suggestion). Brilliantly explosive in the mouth. Incredibly broad and mouth-filling, succulent and stylish, but so vivid and dynamic. A balance constructed out of the battle of the 2 varietals – the amplitude of the Sémillon, the verticality and acidity conveyed by the Sauvignon Blanc. Glass-shatteringly brilliant! 95-97
Château d’Aiguilhe blanc
Château d’Aiguilhe blanc (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sauvignon Blanc, with a little Sauvignon Gris, co-vinified; a final yield of 28 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted at Canon-La-Gaffelière with Stephan and Ludovic von Neipperg). Very tense and defined by its limestone terroir even in its aromatics. A wine that exudes taut tension. One can imagine the structure of this in the mouth just from the aromatic profile alone. More lime and confit lemon notes, a little white grapefruit too. White pear. So intensely juicy and sapid. A much narrower frame and much more depth and layering as a consquence. Dynamically fresh. 92-94
Château de Bellevue Sauvignon Gris
Château de Bellevue Sauvignon Gris (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sauvignon Gris; this comes from Château de Bellevue in Lussac-St-Emilion; certified organic; Hubert de Boüard consulting). I rather like the idea of this as I do the wine itself. Blood orange juice and zest and then some more of both, with a lovely hint of crumbly limestone tannins giving texture on the finish. It’s not complex, but not everything needs to be. 88-90
Château de Malleret blanc
Château de Malleret blanc (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sauvignon Blanc, I think!). Crisp and fresh, bright and crunchy in its fruit profile, this is another Médoc blanc sec more in the style of the Listrac wines like Le Cynge de Fonréaud than the bigger, more oak-influenced richer wines of Pauillac. Juicy and refreshing, with a lovely sapidity and a zing from the zest on the finish. 87-89
Château Doisy-Daëne Grand Vin Sec
Château Doisy-Daëne Grand Vin Sec (Bordeaux blanc). This is very tactile and textural. Aromatically, too, it’s fascinating with a lanolin note that I associate more with the Peyraguey sector of Sauternes. There’s fresh coconut, a little vanilla pod and those assorted fresh citrus notes that bring so much energy to this. The frame is much narrower than, say, Clos Floridene and this almost feels like a plateau St Emilion in the way in which it is structured by the adidity – vertically and architecturally. A great vin blanc with lots of complexity and interest. 92-94
Château Doisy-Daëne Sémillon Pur Calcaire
Château Doisy-Daëne Sémillon Pur Calcaire (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sémillon). The first time I’ve tasted this and I love it. This is absolutely the right terroir (and vintage) for this kind of wine. The limestone takes the Sémillon in charge here, strapping it to the spine and stretching those wonderful citrus-inflected pear and peachy fruits out towards a long-distant vanishing point. Very long, very linear and utterly divine on the finish where the zesty-ness of the lime seems to gather with the minerality from the limestone. Exquisite. 92-94+
Château Fleur Cardinale Grand Vin Blanc
Château Fleur Cardinale Grand Vin Blanc (Bordeaux blanc; 5% Sauvignon Blanc; 25% Sauvignon Gris; a final yield of 38 hl/ha from the 2.42 hectares on a deep clay terroir that comprise the vineyard here; 13% alcohol; Axel Marchal is the consultant). I think this is just the second vintage of this wine – the grand vin blanc from this fabulous limestone terroir. This is exquisite, the almost perfect combination of terroir and vintage. White melon, confit melon (as you might find in a Barsac wine) and then oodles of assorted citrus elements – lemon zest, confit lemon, and lemon flesh, juice and even pith. There’s white grapefruit too and a lovely note of early spring field flowers. The acidity here performs the same role as the tannins in the red, and because we’re on limestone, in much the same, highly vertical way. Vivid and engaging, lively and constantly changing in the mouth, this is utterly sensuous and engagingly tactile. 93-95
Château Fonréaud Le Cygne
Château Fonréaud Le Cygne (Bordeaux blanc; 65% Sauvignon Blanc; 25% Sémillon; 15% Muscadelle). Apple skin, a hint of peach and apricot. The fruit has a gentle and very natural sweetness to it, hinting at residual sugar – almost like the older style of Y d’Yquem. That impression of sugar gives the acidity something to play off and the effect is startling. Jasmine, honeysuckle too, grated fresh ginger and a little hint of saffron. A wine that seems to come from an entirely different vintage from the reds! Vibrant and refreshing. So juicy on the finish. 90-92+
Château Fourças Dupré
Château Fourças Dupré (Bordeaux blanc). I’ve always liked this and I look for it on restaurant lists around Bordeaux. But I find it almost a little severe in this vintage. It certainly has a racy, energetic and vivid acidity, but it’s almost too much – even for me. Nettles, freshly cut grass, hay, fennel and fifty shades of citrus! Lime and linden. Chewy on the finish and intensely juicy, this is made for a strikingly hot day served very cold – but it’s almost shockingly crisp in the mouth (it could almost do with bubbles – sorry, that’s a rather heretical thought I suspect). 87-89
Château Grâce Dieu des Prieurs Chardonnay
Château Grâce Dieu des Prieurs Chardonnay (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Chardonnay; 13% alcohol; aged in a special Radoux barrel designed for whites; Louis Mtjaville is the consultant oenologist here). A fascinating wine to taste after all the Sauvignon/Sémillon blends. This is, as I suppose it should be in a way, impressively Bourguignon. It’s also overtly oaky in a way that the red is not and you have to like that, though it does calm with aeration. Saffron, candlewax, oak smoke, toasted brioche, beurre au fleur de sel, Mirabelle, white flowers and wild floral honey. On the palate this is ample and rich yet glacial and crystalline – more Corton Charlemagne than Puligny-Montrachet! That said, when re-tasted at a rather lower temperature it becomes a little more tense and agile. Succulent, juicy and ever more fresh on the finish where the signature of the vintage which is more present in the more conventional whites of 2024 eventually makes it mark. A fascinating wine which it will be interesting to follow. Available, as ‘collection Elena’, in etched magnums and also in bottle. 91-93
Château Grand Village blanc
Château Grand Village blanc (Bordeaux blanc; 78% Sauvignon Blanc; 22% Sémillon; a final yield of around 50 hl/ha; tasted at Chateau Lafleur). Linden, jasmine, elderflower and elderberry, white currant, redcurrant leaf. Lime, lime zest, confit lime and citron pressé. A little white pear and peach. This is seriously structured by the acidity, like a calcaire red. Beautifully tactile. Energetic. Lithe and dynamic. Tomato consommé in texture and viscosity. And so scrunchy on the finish. I love the hint of natural sweetness of the fruit on the attack. White grapefruit, almost scorched pineapple. Powdery chalky tannins squeeze this out on the finish like water out of a wet towel. Brilliant. 93-95
Château La Loubière Grand Blanc
Château La Loubière Grand Blanc (Bordeaux Supérieur blanc; 42% Sauvignon Blanc; 42% Sauvignon Gris; 16% Sémillon; a tiny yield of just 27 hl from 4 hectares; 13% alcohol; Jean-Claude & Jean-François Berrouet are the consultants here). There’s a little more new oak here (33%) to tame a little the extra breadth and richness coming from the Sémillon, rendering this a more ample and profound wine, with a little less natural gusto and energy as a consequence (in comparison to Le Blanc de L’Etampe, tasted alongside). But the acidity is just as searing in its freshness. There’s a slight hint of vanilla pod too which you don’t quite expect but which brings interest and complexity. Sapid and juicy on the zesty finish. 90-92+
Château Lestage La Mouette
Château Lestage La Mouette (Bordeaux blanc; 55% Sauvignon Blanc; 40% Sémillon; 5% Sauvignon Gris). A little more classical than Fonréaud’s Le Cygne this year with a more biting acidity that is really energising, this is more citrus in its fruit profile – with loads of pink grapefruit and a little hint of blood orange fresh. Crisp, bright, charged the personality, this is exhilarating. A lovely expression of a great vintage for these kinds of wines. Very tempting at its likely price point. 90-92
Château Paveil de Luze Blanc Sec
Château Paveil de Luze Blanc Sec (Bordeaux blanc). This is the first time I’ve tasted this. It’s distinctive and interesting. Candlewax, white pear, sundew mellow, watermelon and a hint of guava and lime. Lemongrass. Glassy and glacial and with quite an ample frame allowing the beady acidity to stream down the cheeks like the spray from the showerhead hitting flesh. 88-90
Château Rayne Vigneau Grand Vin Blanc Sec
Château Rayne Vigneau Grand Vin Blanc Sec (Bordeaux blanc; 80% Sauvignon Blanc; 20% Sémillon). Vertical, structural and highly chiselled – an impression present aromatically as well as on the palate and that comes from the calcaire à astéries terroir from which this hails. Bright, crisp and charged with a racy and energising acidity. Lime zest and juice, confit melon and some distinctly sauternes notes – one really knows where this comes from. Pure, precise, finely balanced and delightfully radiant on the palate. 91-93
Château Reignac
Château Reignac (Bordeaux blanc; 61% Sauvignon Blanc; 14% Sémillon; 25% Sauvignon Gris; a final yield of 41 hl/ha; Michel Rolland is the consultant here). Broad and cheek-filling on the attack with a very cool, glassy and glossy mouthfeel. This is aerial, lifted, intensely fresh and ultra-refreshing, above all on the juicy finish. Not especially complex, but really rather lovely and another perfect accompaniment for a plateau de fruits de mer in the summer sunshine. 87-89.
Château Suduiraut Pur Sémillon
Château Suduiraut Pur Sémillon (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sémillon; pH 3.25; 13.1% alcohol; 27% new oak; tasted at Pichon-Baron with Pierre Montégut). More Sauternes in a way in its aromatics – that touch of lanolin that I am rediscovering in the dry whites from here this year. Glassy and more ample and less tense than the Vieilles Vignes. From 55-60 year old vines. So bright, so fresh and so wonderful in this vintage. The acidity reins in the Sémillon. White pear, assorted white flowers. More horizontal than vertical. Richer and fatter but the freshness animates this from the core. Exquisite. Vibrant and with a brilliant minerality. 93-95+
Château Suduiraut Vieilles Vignes
Château Suduiraut Vieilles Vignes (Bordeaux blanc; 56% Sémillon; 44% Sauvignon Blanc; pH 3.25; 13.1% alcohol; just 12% new oak; tasted at Pichon-Baron with Pierre Montégut). Gooseberry, linden, lime, lime zest and white grapefruit. Elderflower, elderberry and a little jasmine too. Lemon sorbet. A little green tea. A wine of great impact, the intensity ratcheted up by the confines imposed on the fruit by the narrow frame. This is sapid, lithe and juicy with great precision. But it’s delicate too, aerial and lifted. A gorgeous sapid pinch formed by the touch of tannin releases a wave of juiciness that gives additional sustenance on the finish. So mineral. So calcaire. 93-95
Confidence de Bastor-Lamontagne
Confidence de Bastor-Lamontagne (Bordeaux blanc). Relatively simple, perhaps, but with a personality all of its own and a finesse that I really like. This is ample and quite glassy on the palate as a consequence, but there’s lots of detail from the fine penetration of the citrus acidity throughout the palate – both vertically, bringing a sense of layering, and horizontally, bringing texture and almost pixilation. I love the blood orange notes here, both aromatically and again on the palate. I find this very pure and well-composed. Contemplative. 89-91
Le Blanc de Duhart-Milon
Le Blanc de Duhart-Milon (Bordeaux blanc; 60% Sémillon; 35% Sauvigni Blanc; 3% Sauvignon Gris; tasted at Duhart-Milon with Saskia de Rothschild). Another wine from the Médoc with an almost Sauternes-esque profile aromatically – one is almost waiting for the arrival of the sucrosity on the palate. I love that and I love this. White melon, confit lemon, tarte au citron, lemon meringue pie, pear, lanolin. Very pure and with a lovely spherical yet ample core, filled with radiating swirling fresh fruits. Dynamic. There’s a gentle touch of tannin just on the finish. A great success, this is a wine of lovely balance and harmony, the acidity producing tension but never destabilising the luxuriance. 92-94+
Le Blanc de Fontenil
Le Blanc de Fontenil (Bordeaux blanc; a blend, if I recall correctly, of Sauvignon Blanc, Sémillon, Chardonnay, Sauvignon Gris and Muscadelle). Another blanc sec that I am tasting for the first time. Lime, linden, white grapefruit and a little ginger and jasmine. Quite plump and rich in its way but thoroughly interpenetrated by veins of sapid juiciness; a perfect accompaniment for oysters, with a hint of iodine and lots of salinity on the finish. It’s a little overt in its oak use for me, but by no means excessively. 89-91
Le Blanc de L’Etampe
Le Blanc de L’Etampe (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; 13% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; Jean-Claude & Jean-François Berrouet are the consultants here). Not perhaps the most inspired of names for a wine, but the wine is inspiring in the fabulous intensity of its fruitiness and its energetic freshness, exuding tension and verticality, lift and interest. Confit grapefruit zest, assorted freshly squeezed citrus juices, a little white melon flesh and the subtlest of hints of sweet spice (the 20% new oak is very subtle, but it’s there). There’s a scratch of raw ginger too. Vivid. 91-93
Le Nardian
Le Nardian (Bordeaux blanc; a blend of Sauvignon Blanc, Sémillon and Muscadelle, if I recall, as I’m ashamed to admit that I’ve lost the fiche technique!). A wine’s whose style works well with the characteristics of the vintage. For me it’s often a little too rich and lacks tension and poise, but here the naturally elevated acidity of the vintage really helps. It remains exotic in its fruit profile but in 2024 it’s the fresher exotic notes that we find – passionfruit and guava, roasted pineapple with more classical pink grapefruit and citron pressé. Racy and energetic, yet substantial and quite viscous, this is vintage of Le Nardian for which I am an enthusiast. 89-91.
Les Champs Libres
Les Champs Libres (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sauvignon Blanc from Sancerre massal selections, the older vines at 15 years of age now; tasted at Chateau Lafleur with Omri Ram and Baptiste Guinaudeau). Green tea leaf, citron pressé, white grapefruit, gooseberry, a little peach too, linden and white pear, grated ginger. A touch of elderflower, camomile, even a subtle hint of rose water. Aromatically soft and gentle leading you to expect something much more opulent on the palate. Broad-framed but charged immediately by the acidity and the little granularity of the grippy tannins. An hourglass, with lift and structural depth. So juicy and sapid on the finish. 94-96.
Lilium de Château Climens
Lilium de Château Climens (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sémillon; less than 1 g/L of residual sugar; pH 3.3; 13% alcohol). At present there is no Climens 2024. But there is this and it is, as ever, remarkable and delightful. Orchid, jasmine, hibiscus, a subtle hint of candlewax, but no more, and a suggestion of myrrh. White grapefruit, mandarin orange and a scratch of lemon zest. A little fluffy lemon meringue pie too. As that suggests, this is aerial, delicate, and refined. But it also has a lovely sense of structure in the mouth – constructed by the limestone tannins and aided greatly by the vertical acidity. This is the white equivalent of a plateau St Emilion – highly sculpted and architectural. Glassy in the mid-palate, yet sinuous too. Long and finely textured. 92-94
Lions de Suduiraut
Lions de Suduiraut (Bordeaux blanc; 56% Sémillon; 29% Sauvignon Blanc; 15% Sauvignon Gris; pH 3.15; 12.7% alcohol; tasted at Pichon-Baron with Pierre Montégut). Lithe, limpid, fresh and bright with a delicate white floral and citrus aromatic profile and rather greater direct impact on the palate. Almost chewy in its freshness, like reacting to the tartness of the fresh juice in a Granny Smith apple. Crunchy with it. Impressive. 89-91
Pagodes blanc de Cos d’Estournel
Pagodes blanc de Cos d’Estournel (Bordeaux blanc; 61 Sémillon; 39% Sauvignon Blanc; tasted at Cos d’Estournel). Rich, aromatically explosive and very true to its style, with a certain opulence and expressiveness. A lovely sweet aromatic profile and yet on the palate that brilliantly vivid and vibrant freshness. Lime zest, lime confit – indeed, 50 shades of lime. White grapefruit. A little guava perhaps. Quince and pear. Some Sauternes notes – even lanolin. Iodine. 91-93
Pavillon Blanc de Château Margaux
Pavillon Blanc de Château Margaux (Bordeaux blanc; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 30 hl/ha which is good given the age of the vines here; 40% of the total crop selected for the grand vin; pH 3.2, a little higher than usual, due to the little rain; 13% alcohol). Gorgeous aromatics. Gooseberry, greengage, red and white currant, white current leaf, jasmine, elderflower and elderberry and then 50 shades of citrus. A little pear and quince even (a note I usually associate more with Sémillon). Some exotic fruits too – guava, passionfruit. A little hint of the limestone terroir and a crushed rock mineral note. So intense and yet soft and gracious on the attack. Fresh and vivid and vibrant in its vertical lift. Upward swirls of freshness, as if with a different and higher viscosity animate the palate. A lovely delicate limestone and saline minerality. So pure and fresh and linear on the rippling long finish. Exquisite. 96-98
Stella Solaris
Stella Solaris (Bordeaux blanc; 60% Sémillon; 20% Sauvignon Gris; 20% Sauvignon Blanc – all co-planted; tasted with Pierre Courdurié at Croix de Labrie). Creamy, but tense. This has no fat. Linden. Candlewax. White grapefruit. White pear. Confit melon and confit lemon and lime. Elderflower. Lime zest. Brilliantly chewy and sapid, the acidity and the slight hint of limestone tannin together grab the fruit and structure and distribute it out over the palate. The zest and the limestone work wonderfully together. A wine with a very authentic terroir and vintage signature. 92-94

Margaux

Alter Ego de Château Palmer
Alter Ego de Château Palmer (Margaux; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 34% Merlot; 6% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 22 hl/ha; mildew losses, coulure and millerandage, roughly 50:50 in terms of losses; pH 3.7; 65% pf the total production; 12 % vin de presse; 13% alcohol; tasted with Thomas Duroux at the property). There’s lovely ripeness and a natural sweetness to this. Walnut and even a touch of frangipane. And great purity too to the cassis, damson and assorted dark plum fruits. Harmonious and joyous, with broad cashmere sheets rather than the more habitual silk of the vintage. Soft on the first half of the palate, more grainy towards the nicely sustained finish. There’s good density too. This maybe lacks some of the crystallinity of the 2023 but I like the menthol lift and the return to graphite on the finish. 91-93
Baron de Brane
Baron de Brane (Margaux; 50% Merlot; 50% Cabernet Sauvignon; pH 3.52; 15.5% vin de presse; 12.8% alcohol; selected from Terrace 3 and Terrace 5 and so not really a second wine at all; just 20% of the total production in 2024; tasted at the property with Henri Lurton). Beautifully plush and intensely floral, with quite a charged, tight and taut mid-palate, not the greatest density nor the greatest amplitude but that archetypal Brane clarity and crystallinity. Layers of silk fluttering in the breeze bringing a sense of dynamism and energy. This has a pleasing natural sweetness, with a little more cherry in the mouth and a touch of graphite too. I find this very classically of the appellation and a fabulous introduction to the quality of even the second-selection terroirs of this incredible estate. 89-91
Blason d’Issan
Blason d’Issan (Margaux; 52% Cabernet Sauvignon ; 46% Merlot; 2% Petit Verdot; IPT 59; 12.9% alcohol; this will be bottled in June and released in September; tasted at the property with Augustin Lacaille). Aromatically very pure, with lovely floral notes. Blueberry and cassis. Black cherry. There’s a gracious plump, plush dark-fruitedness to this that is very enticing. Good ripeness and yet great sapidity and freshness too. Not the mid-palate delineation of the grand vin, of course, but I find this impressive and distinctively d’Issan! 89-91
Château Angludet
Château Angludet (Margaux; 59% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 1% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 29 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Quite earthy in its minerality which is very evident aromatically and which rather overpowers at first the subtle fresh floral notes. Red cherry and a mix of red and darker berry fruits. Sandalwood (something of a signature at this address). On the palate, this is soft and juicy with a nice forward thrust over the palate. It feels lithe and energetic, though it lacks a little complexity like many. 88-90
Château Brane-Cantenac
Château Brane-Cantenac (Margaux; 77% Cabernet Sauvignon; 22% Merlot; 1% Cabernet Franc – all sourced from the plateau of Brane on Terrace 4 terroirs; pH 3.53; 11.3% press wine; an impressive final yield of 46.6 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; around 40% of the total production after a very strict selection; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then at the property with Henri Lurton). The 100th anniversary of the Lurton family’s acquisition of the property. Black cherries, plump blueberries, cassis, black berry, bramble, walnut oil and cedar, cedar, cedar (actually, it’s a little more subtle than that implies). Peonies and irises too. This is slow to open but gorgeously enticing as it does so (it’s actually a little less closed when re-tasted at the property). Plump, plush, lithe and extremely refined. Soft and succulent, that gentle Rpulse extraction allowing this to attain a density very rare in the vintage. The acidity is just a little raised, but this is a very fine achievement, with the wine even achieving a certain opulence. It doesn’t have quite the mid-palate delineation and sparkle of the 2020 or 2022 but it is excellent when set it any comparative context. Remarkably (and unmistakably) Brane! 92-94+
Château Cantenac Brown
Château Cantenac Brown (Margaux; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 27.5% Merlot; 1.5% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 32 hl/ha [the 37 hl/ha in the vineyard reduced on the sorting tables]; pH 3.72; 13.1% alcohol; the grand vin represents 52% of the total production after very strict selection; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Closer and closer to its near neighbour in density, the softness and quality of its tannins and the succulence of the mid-palate, but a little fresher and more aerial and lifted in personality. It’s also characterised by a slightly different florality – more gladioli and wisteria, a little rose petal. The frame is a little narrower, but that accentuates the feeling of depth and gravitas. Very sapid on the finish. Lovely. Impressively substantial for the vintage and very finely judged. 92-94
Château d’Issan
Château d’Issan (Margaux; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; 2% Malbec; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 39.8 hl/ha; aging in oak barrels, 50% of them new; pH 3.58; IPT 62; 12.9% alcohol; tasted at the property with Augustin Lacaille). Gracious in its florality. Peony, iris, the bulbs of both. Black cherry and cassis, a lovely Cabernet Sauvignon leafiness too. Blackcurrant leaf. Cedar. Walnut shell. This is tightly-wound and spherical at the core, increasing the sensation of intensity in the mouth. Violets with aeration. Taut, tense, chewy, a lovely svelte and fine-grained tannin. Impressive if not quite at the same level of purity as the 2020 or 2022. Exquisite nonetheless. 92-94+
Château Dauzac
Château Dauzac (Margaux; 77% Cabernet Sauvignon; 23% Merlot; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Floral too, at least at first, but these more subtle aromatic notes tend to become a little over-whelmed by the heavier earthy mineral tones. That said they return as one dials in on the aromatic florality. Dark and concentrated, cool and composed in the depths of the cylindrical mid-palate, this has a lovely mouthfeel but lacks complexity in comparison with, say, Brane or Cantenac Brown, the tannins just a touch drier on the finish too. But, that said, this is an ambitious wine well-attained and it’s very juicy on the finish. 91-93
Château Desmirail
Château Desmirail (Margaux; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 15% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 10% Petit Verdot; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Less opulently floral than the excellent 2023, but still very much more archetypically ‘of Margaux’ than it used to be – with gladioli and gladioli bulb much in evidence, accompanying the cherry and cherry stone notes. Glossy, sapid and deliciously succulent in the mid-palate, this is ample and enticing and will be approachable early and drink young. It lacks a little density, but what we lose in girth we gain in limpidity and energy. For me, that’s the right way to manage the trade-off. 89-91
Château du Tertre
Château du Tertre (Margaux; 75% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 2% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lush and plush in its gracious, slightly delicate and subtle florality with a very dark berry and cherry fruit – the marriage of the two so attractive. A gorgeously refined and very fluid wine, with great appellation character and the product of the gentlest of extractions, this is a wine of elegance and finesse. One of the best results from here in recent vintages. Exquisite. I simply love the floral-enrobed cedar on the finish 92-94
Château Durfort-Vivens
Château Durfort-Vivens (Margaux; 94% Cabernet Sauvignon – only topped in 2021 as a proportion; 6% Merlot; a final yield of 37 hl/ha; certified organic and biodynamic; Eric Boissenot is the consultant; tasted with Gonzague Lurton). Richer and fuller, more ample and generous than Ferrière. Creamy too, with a lovely walnut oil and walnut shell note alongside the crunchy dark berry and damson fruit. There’s that signature black cherry note too. A gentle florality, less immediately expressive than in recent vintages, but it’s there and it will come through more and more with élévage and bottle age – lily of the valley and peony predominantly, maybe a little wisteria too. A scratch of green peppercorn. And, with air more and more cedar and, with it, a touch of violet and finally those rose petals. In the mouth this is really impressive, with a sense of depth and profundity and, indeed, of layering that is present in this vintage only at the very top of the pyramid. Cool, very fine and dominated by that dark Cabernet fruit. The mouthfeel is exquisite, the tannins always present but in a gently pixilating way, picking out details from the sea of cashmere that forms the tactile mid-palate here. Fresh and lifted on the finish, with the tannins pinching and lifting the wine to a pleasing crescendo. A sprig of mint on the finish. 93-95
Château Ferrière
Château Ferrière (Margaux; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 18% Petit Verdot; 10% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 16 hl/ha, with significant mildew losses; pH 3.80; 12.2% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; Eric Boissenot is the consultant; tasted with Claire & Gonzague Lurton). Brighter, fresher, more lifted, more precise and more aerial than La Gurgue, but with the same sense of softness and creaminess – rare in the vintage – somehow evident even from the aromatic profile. A lovely very pure blackcurrant fruit, again with that signature Ferrière wild herbal and floral component that reinforces the impression of something natural (this is, of course, organic and biodynamic). There’s a touch of graphite and cedar too and, with aeration, a little damson. Sumptuously refined and both soft and delicate on the attack. But then the laser-sharp pure fruit cuts through the heart of the mid-palate. Very lively and energetic and very vivid in its fruit purity, this is great success (despite the small yields) in the vintage. 91-93
Château Giscours
Château Giscours (Margaux; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 31% Merlot; 6% Cabernet Franc; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then re-tasted at the property with Jérôme Poisson). Picked in successive tries – with the old vine Cabernet picked in some cases 10 days apart from the young Cabernet. Coiled and beautiful in its slightly wistful, dark berry and cherry aromatics. A touch of walnut oil. The florality is very delicate and there’s a hint of incense and candle smoke that I love here, again very delicate. Cool and beautifully composed with a pronounced spherical core densely packed with bright, vivid dark berry fruits. Crystalline in texture and nicely layered if lacking a little of the detail of the 2022 and 2023; but with all of the focussed precision of both. Very composed and beguiling. 93-95
Château Kirwan
Château Kirwan (Margaux; 68% Cabernet Sauvignon; 18% Merlot; 8% Cabernet Franc; 5% Petit Verdot; 1% Carménère; a final yield of 27 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Graphite, a dark plummy fruit with a few more briary fruits thrown in to the mix – brambles and black berries. Fresh and juicy, an impression reinforced by the slightly elevated acidity. But the acidity is well-modulated and well-distributed over the palate. This is less ample than many of its peers and more linear as a consequence but it’s never strict. Quite vivid and vivacious. There’s a hint of cedar to come right on the finish. 91-93
Château La Gurgue
Château La Gurgue (Margaux; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 25% Merlot; 15% Petit Verdot; a final yield of just 12 hl/ha; pH 3.74; 12.1% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; Eric Boissenot is the consultant; tasted with Claire & Gonzague Lurton). Dark chocolate and crushed raspberries, lemon thyme (signalling the acidity) and blood orange too; a little hint of sweet spice. Fresh, bright, crunchy in its fruit profile and with fine-grained tannins sufficient to take in charge the fruit and distribute it evenly over the palate. Quite linear as a consequence with a long, gently tapering finish. No harshness. The yields may be very low here but this has been very well managed in the chai. 89-91
Château Labégorce
Château Labégorce (Margaux; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Cedar, peonies and black cherries, a little red cherry perhaps too and even a note of redcurrant and cranberry. This seems riper and richer aromatically than in the mouth, where the somewhat elevated acidity renders this more strict and taciturn than one imagines at first. But it’s still an impressive showing in a challenging vintage. 90-92
Château Lascombes
Château Lascombes (Margaux; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc & Petit Verdot combined; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; sourced from the ‘historic’ terroirs of the estate; 13% alcohol; tasted three times, the first with Axel Heinz). A lovely vibrant purple rim. Glossy and charming. Immediately and effusively floral. But nuttier when re-tasted at the UGC, with more cracked black pepper notes too. This is an entirely different wine to the one we are familiar with from Lascombes. Lilac, lily, a hint of violet and white rose. Very pretty aromatically. A pointillist’s version of the still life vase of freshly cut flowers. Precise and eloquent in its detail. Very natural. Very focussed. In the mouth this is lifted and elegant, very much at the top of the palate but there is considerable depth and concentration too – it’s just disguised. Sapid and juicy, long and fresh. I love the cedar that comes through in the mid-palate above all with aeration. Crystalline and pure, and highly refined this is very true to the style being crafted since 2023. The new Lascombes identity is already very clear. 93-95. [I also tasted Lascombes’ new cuvée La Côte de Lascombes (Margaux; 100% Merlot from almost 5 hectares on clay over limestone). This will not be released en primeur. Since the first vintage to be released is the 2022 in September I will respect the preferences of the property and hold back my tasting note for now. But, without giving too much away, it’s exceptional!]
Château Malescot Saint-Exupéry
Château Malescot Saint-Exupéry (Margaux; 46% Cabernet Sauvignon; 41% Merlot; 13% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 20 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lovely very classical Margellais aromatics – walnut, salted macademia nuts, black cherries, plump dark fruits of the forest and a suggestion of cedar. A subtle florality too. Sumptuous and impressively deep, dark and velvety on the palate, this is a considerable success. The acidity does tend to gather towards the finish and the effect is that this loses some of the opulence of the nose and the succulence of the mid-palate, but that’s well compensated for by the juiciness of the finish. Nicely done. Not exactly sleek, but very stylish and suave. 92-94
Château Margaux
Château Margaux (Margaux; 93% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Merlot; 1% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; impressively, the grand vin represents 46% of the production, rather than the more usual 40% due to the higher yielding Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 30 hl/ha due to the aggressiveness of the mildew, especially for the Merlot on clay soils, with the Cabernet Sauvignon on gravel much less impacted; the early-harvesting parcels were excellent and fully ripe, the rest proved more difficult; there were no problem here with floraison; a final yield of 30 hl/ha due to mildew losses predominantly suffered in Merlot parcels; IPT 64; 12.8% alcohol; 13% vin de press [comparatively low]; tasted at the property with Philippe Bascaules and Sébastien Vergne). We are in the realm of Cabernet Sauvignon here and I find this gloriously expressive and expansive in its Cabernet purity. White and red currant. A little touch of mulberry. Bramble. Blackberry. A hint of black cherry skin – if perhaps more textural than aromatic. This is, for now, a little less floral than it has been en primeur in recent vintages. Graphite and a touch of scratched new leather. Walnut oil. A peppery virgin olive oil note. In the mouth, this is super-gracious on the cool, soft, almost voluptuous attack (entry is a better – a softer – word). Layered, like Pavillon rouge, with much more vertical than horizontal range. Not the pixilated purity and delineation of some recent vintages. I believe them entirely when they tell me that this is better with the press wine and that the press wine is very fine but it does not yet feel fully integrated into the core of the mid-palate. But what I love is the cool, dark sensuous quality that is both so very beguiling and so essentially ‘Margaux’. The fruit profile on the finish is a little more red in hue – loganberry replacing the black berry fruits. Very fresh and lively, cool and precise and texturally enticing. 93-95
Château Marquis d’Alesme Becker
Château Marquis d’Alesme Becker (Margaux; 30% Merlot; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Petit Verdot; 5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Intensely floral and ‘bulb’-y in that florality once again (it’s a characteristic of the vintage) – peony blooms and their bulbs (carried home from the market and unwrapped!), blueberries and cherries, a little damson too. This has quite an intimate feel in the mouth, a sensation that comes from the narrow frame and the cool spherical core. Subtle, delicate, not terribly demonstrative by finely textured. The only issue is the somewhat dry character of the tannins on the finish. 90-92+
Château Marquis de Terme
Château Marquis de Terme (Margaux; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 38% Merlot; 2% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting). A wine that, in a way, is almost flattered by the vintage – which seems like an odd thing to say. That said, I can’t help but feel as though the extraction has been pushed just a touch further than would have been my preference in the search for more volume in the mouth. That, for me, comes at the expense of delineation and detail, rendering the fruit a little less precise. Tasted a second time, I find more clarity and precision on the attack and the front of the palate, but it still loses a little of its shape in the mouth towards the finish. But the floral aromatics are enticing and even if the wood will take a little longer to be fully integrated it reinforces that florality and with it the Margaux typicity of this wine. 90-92
Château Monbrison
Château Monbrison (Margaux; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 25% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Impressive with quite an intense, again slightly bulby florality (not the blooms but the prospect of the blooms!). A touch of graphite, a scratch of pencil shaving and a hint of the cedar to come. This doesn’t have quite the delineation and definition on the mid-palate as the stars of the appellation but it’s succulent and juicy and very much an expression of its Margaux terroir and typicity. 90-92+
Château Palmer
Château Palmer (Margaux; 59% Cabernet Sauvignon; 41% Merlot; a final yield of 22hl/ha; pH 3.7; IPT 70; 11% vin de presse; 13.2% alcohol; tasted with Thomas Duroux at the property). Ethereal and magisterial in its poise and elegance, this is also very classical. Fruits of the forest. Mulberry. A touch of the signature black cherry and black cherry skin, even a hint of black forest gateau. A touch of iris, some violet with aeration. Walnut oil. Kalamata olive tapenade. Cassis. This is much more crystalline than Alter Ego in this vintage and gloriously sapid when the tannins start to grip in the mid-palate. This is so clear, limpid and lithe and the tannins are tactile and beady but always ultra-fine grained. In short, a great success in the context of any vintage. 94-96
Château Paveil de Luze
Château Paveil de Luze (Margaux; cru bourgeois exceptionnel; 100% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 53 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; Stephane Derenoncourt & Simon Blanchard are the consultants here). Impressive at this level. Plush, succulent and quite velvety in its texture with a lovely deep cassis and blackcurrant aromatic profile conveyed to the palate. Black cherry and damson too. Sapid on the finish, the tannins just hinting as dryness, but this is still a colossal achievement in a tricky vintage. 89-91
Château Prieuré-Lichine
Château Prieuré-Lichine (Margaux; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 29% Merlot; 6% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 22 hl/ha in the vineyard and just 20 hl/ha for the grand vin after densimetric sorting with a lot less Merlot in the final blend as a consequence; aging in oak barrels, 35% new; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting). An intriguing wine that has me rather in two minds. I love the initially shy but increasingly expressive Cabernet-dominated aromatics that seem to suit very well the identity of Prieuré-Lichine; and I love, too, the delicate violet and rose petal florality here. And there’s a hint too of the graphite that will come through more with élévage and bottle aging. This is creamy, too, on the attack and the tannins have been beautifully managed. But in the mid-palate I find this both a little lean and, perhaps more significantly, lacking in complexity – it seems to lose the identity established aromatically. It’s almost a little dilute. That said, you can only work with what you harvest and I suspect the choices made here are the right ones. Early drinking and highly accessible, it will be interesting to see whether it grows in volume a little during its (presumably quite short) élévage. 90-92+
Château Rauzan-Gassies
Château Rauzan-Gassies (Margaux; 73% Cabernet Sauvignon; 27% Merlot; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Never a wine flattered by being tasted at this stage, but here I find it rather more Margellais than is often the case en primeur. A subtle floral note and dark plummy and damson fruit – some cassis with aeration (and all rather pretty if very subtle). But on the palate it’s so soft and gentle that it seems not to express much and feels also just a little dilute. The finish is actually more interesting – returning to and developing the floral theme and with some of the cassis coming through – so I’ll be interested to revisit this in bottle. Difficult to assess, but this might turn out to be a conservative rating. 89-91
Château Rauzan-Ségla
Château Rauzan-Ségla (Margaux; 63.5% Cabernet Sauvignon; 34% Merlot; 2% Petit Verdot; 0.5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 29 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This is very beautifully balanced and very beautifully composed. Subtle floral notes (violet and rose petal), lovely ripe cassis and blackcurrant and bramble fruits, that typical Rauzan-Ségla walnut and graphite note and just the suggestion of the cedar that will eventually enrobe all of this so elegantly – a little more when re-tasted a week later at Canon. Blood orange. Sapid, limpid and quite sinuous for Rauzan-Ségla this is very classy and it transcends the vintage. This expresses the terroir so well. So incredibly harmonious. 93-95
Château Siran
Château Siran (Margaux; 56% Cabernet Sauvignon; 36% Merlot; 8% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 45.5 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting). This treads the tight-rope wire and threads the needle of the vintage well. It’s dark berry-fruited, with a little purple plum and damson, it has that Margaux florality and a wild heathery moorland note too that I have often found in recent vintages of Siran (as well as in some very old ones). The Cabernet signature is especially attractive and this remains pure, precise and limpid all the way to quite a distant vanishing point. Not the poise or outright elegance or charm of, say, 2020, but this is an excellent result from a very consistent address. 91-93
Le Chevalier de Lascombes
Le Chevalier de Lascombes (Margaux; 70% Merlot; 27% Cabernet Sauvignon; 3% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; this comes from what they now, rather disparagingly, call the ‘satellite’ plots of the estate; tasted with Axel Heinz). Lovely. Very Margellais. Fresh and pure, with a pulpy fresh berry fruit. There’s a gentle natural sweetness too and a touch of graphite. Subtle floral notes with a slightly bulby character to the florality that I rather like. Hyacinth. Peony. This opens nicely in the glass even if it’s a little introvert at first with the bright, crisp, fresh fruits generously enrobing a narrow spherical core. There’s a hint of the tartness of the vintage but it’s not discombobulating. Long and chewy on the finish. Pure. Focussed. Precise. 89-91
Pavillon Rouge Château Margaux
Pavillon Rouge Château Margaux (Margaux; 77% Cabernet Sauvignon; 11% Merlot; 9% Cabernet Franc; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 28% of the crop; IPT 65; elevated temperature at the end of the fermentation to up the tannin extraction with longer maceration too; a little chaptalisation; 12.9% alcohol; 12.5% press wine). Lovely Cabernet Sauvignon cassis and black currant fruits. A little mulberry. A touch of blueberry perhaps from the Cabernet Franc that is very present here. Gracious. Quite lifted, this is a wine with more vertical than horizontal range. A touch of iris bulb. A hint of walnut shell imparting a gentle nutty creaminess. Not massive and the acidity is quite elevated. Lovely, soft, fine-grained yet structuring tannins. Sapid and juicy to the core. Beautiful but in quite a linear, almost slightly strict, style. Energetic and vibrant with the grip of the tannings bringing lift to the finish. 91-93+
Ségla
Ségla (Margaux; not released en primeur and distributed solely by Ulysse Cazabonne). Quite saline. Full, rich, pure and nicely focussed. The fruit is distributed over quite a broad frame. Glossy, crystalline, dark-fruited to the core and gracious in its sapidity. A lovely bucket full of cedar in the mid-palate generously enrobing the dark berry fruits. Excellent value and highly recommended. Sapid on the finish. An excellent introduction to the grand vin that is (not for the first, nor probably the last time) better than many first wines of the classed growths in the vintage. 90-92+

Saint-Émilion

Arômes de Pavie
Arômes de Pavie (Saint-Émilion; from dedicated parcels; 50% Merlot; 50% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 22.2 hl/ha; pH 3.55; 13.7% alcohol; tasted at Pavie). Lifted, delicate in its way but with a disguised richness and puissance. Creamy. Cedar, graphite and pencil shavings, damsons and blueberries – from all of that glorious Cabernet Franc. There’s a gentle dark petally florality too. And black forest gateau – very much a Pavie note. I find this supple and soft and elegant on the attack, again with dark cherry and berry fruits, and with a little dark chocolate enrobing the deep, dense spherical core. And it’s long and rippling on the finish, as the chalky tannins engage. An impressive wine, very close in quality to where the grand vin used to be! 92-94+
Carillon d’Angélus
Carillon d’Angélus (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 45 hl/ha; pH 3.55; 13.5% alcohol, with no chaptalisation; tasted at Angélus with Benjamin Laforet). Graphite and cedar, a much darker more intense berry fruit than No. 3 and considerably more concentration, depth and gravitas. A very delicate touch of vanilla and sweet spice – but perfectly moderated. This is tense and taut yet beautifully balanced. There’s a hint already from the aromatics of the dusty chalky character of the tannins (even if the parcels include grapes from non-calcaire terroirs such as the plots next to Figeac). Lush, plush and with quite an ample frame. Here the silken layers are thicker and the fruits more concentrated at each level than with No. 3, but still with the calcaire tannins entering between each layer and reinforcing the impression of vertical depth as well as horizontal reach. Crystalline, pure, precise, focussed and glassy. Very long too. 92-94+.
Chapelle d’Ausone
Chapelle d’Ausone (Saint-Émilion; 85% Cabernet Franc; 15% Cabernet Sauvignon; tasted at Ausone with Constance and Camille Vauthier). This is pure Cabernet, as in 2021. And it’s sublime. A little closed and introspective at first but really enticing – with a lovely leafiness to the cassis, bramble and black berry fruits. Cedar wafts through the fruits with or without aeration after the passage of time. There’s iris, a touch of lily of the valley, saffron too. So pure and gracious, with just the optimal degree of freshness – bringing considerable precision and focus to the fruits. This is pixilated and detailed and delineated, like a mirror held up to the perfection of the fruit. Gracious and lithe, limpid and sapid. A different style of Chapelle that is very respectful of the vintage. It is light and aerial but it fills out with aeration. 92-94
Chapelle de Labrie
Chapelle de Labrie (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 13.5% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; tasted at the property with Pierre Courdurié). Already nice and ripe with lovely raspberry fruit, a little cassis too and bramble. Nice purity and precision. Clean and quite crystalline. Lumineux. Nice graphite. Cool at the centre, spherical with impressive concentration and density for a second selection. Tender and chewy, sapid and fresh on the finish. Crumbly tannins. A lovely signature of calcaire tannins. Lovely. 89-91
Chatea Bélair-Monange
Chatea Bélair-Monange (Saint-Émilion; 98% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 35 hl/ha after a combination of optimetric and densimetric sorting; 13% alcohol; tasted in the architectural splendour of the Herzog & de Meuron winery with Edouard Moueix). Brilliant in its shimmering fruit purity. A very pure cassis fruit. Very lifted and aerial, the signature of its limestone terroir and sous-sol. A vertical seam of black currant encrusted in graphite with a little cedar and that beautiful wisteria and peony florality that is one of the signatures of the plateau in this vintage. With aeration, there is also an iris bulb note to the florality (the potential of the blooms to come), rose petals and rosewater. Walnut. So gracious, elegant and beautifully expressive of the vintage. There’s a touch of leafiness from the Cabernet Franc that teases delightfully. Tight, taut yet crystalline, pure and very precise – the pixilation achieved here by the work of the granular and beady chalky tannins and resembling the beautifully sculpted walls of the interior of the chai and tasting room. With air the palate fills out, revealing more depth and considerable layering (it’s as if one starts to see the profundity of the limestone that forms the essence of this wine) – and the cedar engages too. This has, for me, the most beautiful aromatic profile of the vintage as well as a gorgeously succulent and tender mouthfeel that sings so eloquently of its terroir. Definitively one of the wines of the vintage. It’ll be fascinating to see how this evolves – I sense that it might close down before it really blossoms. Highly accessible for now but a wine for the ages. 96-98
Château Angélus
Château Angélus (Saint-Émilion; 60% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Franc; this is Hubert de Boüard’s 40th vintage and it is marked on the label; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; pH 3.55; 13.8% with no chaptalisation; tasted at Angélus with Benjamin Laforet). A gloriously frank (Cabernet) franc nose. So obviously Angélus, though it could almost be Hommage à Elizabeth Bouchet (the 100 per cent Cabernet Franc micro-cuvée)! Violet. Peony blooms. Grated dark single estate chocolate. Fruits of the forest. Damson. Black cherry. Blueberry and confit blueberry. A hint of frangipane. Cedar. Graphite. This is succulent and svelte on the layered entry – we move here from Carillon’s layers of silk to the grand vin’s pillows of velvet. Lots of depth and a wide and ample frame too, with gravitas coming from the chalky tannins that pull the bottom layers downwards and in the space that creates release both menthol and a wondrous juicy sapidity. This grows and grows in the mouth. Very precise and intensely detailed. Long and subtle, beautifully balanced and always fresh. 95-97
Château Ausone
Château Ausone (Saint-Émilion; 65% Cabernet Franc; 35% Merlot; tasted at Ausone with Constance and Camille Vauthier). Spiritual. Much more expressive than La Chapelle with the Merlot setting the frame for the gloriously radiant Cabernet Franc to express itself. Damsons, damson skin, blueberries, brambles and a little mulberry. Graphite and a suggestion of gentle sweet spice from the oak. That very Ausone roasted walnut note too. Peony and a hint of wisteria. Maybe a rose petal or two. This has a gracious natural sweetness, the fruit just al dente. More red berries than usual here, a little less cherry. The grip of the tannins pinches and releases the sapidity gently sculpting and constructing the architecture of the wine. Intensely sapid in the mid-palate. Gracious, elegant with great finesse and fabuloulys chewy crumbly limestone tannins on the finish. 94-96+
Château Badette
Château Badette (Saint-Émilion; 67% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 45hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Fresh, bright and lifted. Grated coconut, lily of the valley and a blend of blackberry and blackcurrant, a hint of spice. Generous on the attack and then brought almost abruptly back to the spine by the grippy tannins. A nice expression of its terroir and quite juicy in the mid-palate, the tannins are perhaps just a little abrasive on the finish. 90-92
Château Balestard La Tonnelle
Château Balestard La Tonnelle (Saint-Émilion; 56% Merlot; 17% Cabernet Franc; 27% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 39 hl/ha after the all-important densimetric sorting; pH 3.46; 13.5% alcohol; Jean-Philippe Fort is the consultant here). Bright and quite floral, with crushed petals alongside the black raspberry and loganberry fruit, the florality reinforced by subtle support from the oak. I find this impressively lithe and limpid in the mid-palate and very sapid and juicy on the finish. There’s quite a volume of tannin, but the grain is fine and this should age very gracefully. In the context of the vintage, the strongest Balestard La Tonnelle that I have tasted. There’s a pleasing natural sweetness on the finish. 91-93
Château Beau-Séjour-Bécot
Château Beau-Séjour-Bécot (Saint-Émilion; 78% Merlot; 22% Cabernet Franc, after recent replanting to increase the proportion with young massal-selection Cabernet Franc; a final yield reduced by densimetric sorting – from 42 hl/ha on picking to 32 hl/ha after sorting; pH 3.42; 13.1% alcohol; tasted at the property with Julien Barthe). The hydric stress at the end of the summer here was actually higher even than in 2020. The phenolic maturity was present early (by early September), but what was delayed was the aromatic ripeness – which came later, accelerating towards the picking date. Late harvested, even with the risk of botrytis, hence the need for drastic selection. This is very true to its style and very much on the qualitative plateau set by recent vintages. Tension, freshness and minerality. This is creamy, rich and quite broad-framed for this vintage on the plateau. Black berry and bramble. Blackcurrant and white current leaf, a hint of blueberry too from the Cabernet Franc. Sage and bay leaf. Maybe a little thyme. This is lovely texturally, with quite a dense spherical core whose perimeters are set and outlined like the pencil strokes of an artist by the crumbly tannins. There’s lots of salinity, even a touch of oyster shell, on the finish. 92-94+
Château Beauséjour
Château Beauséjour (Saint-Émilion; 72% Merlot; 28% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 28 hl/ha after selecting just ‘the caviar’ from the bunches; 13% alcohol; tasted at the property with Joséphine Duffau-Lagarrosse; a little bit of vin de presse, but only around 7%; Axel Marchal & Julien Viaud are the consultants here). This is shy and a little closed at first. Walnut and walnut oil; black cherry; brambles; blueberries; peony; wisteria; violet; blood orange. So gorgeously beguiling on the palate. Not a massively ample frame, lozenge-shaped in the mouth with crumbly chalky tannins at the edges breaking into the core and releasing little plumes of freshness that seem to radiate out from the centre. A pleasing viscosity. This is a superb wine that really respects the vintage fantastically well. It’s brilliantly lifted, with aeration in the mouth seemingly releasing an upwardly pointed firehose of fresh sapid, juicy fruits. There’s a lovely nuttiness on the finish and, eventually, the cedar that is always just on the verge of breaking through and that wraps itself around and enrobes the fresh blueberries and black cherries like a dear friend. This will age gracefully and it might shut down a little before it really expresses itself. But it’s going to be fabulous! 95-97
Château Bellefont-Belcier
Château Bellefont-Belcier (Saint-Émilion; from a natural amphitheatre of 14 hectares on clay-limestone and Molasses de Fronsadais next to Larcis-Ducasse on the Côte Pavie; 70% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; pH 3.25; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then at Bellefont-Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Big, broad, bold and charged with assorted fresh red and darker berry and stone fruits. Sandalwood. With aeration it’s the gracious cherry and cassis notes that come through. This is very layered and has much more density than many of its peers – but like some of its terroir neighbours, Larcis Ducasse above all (note to self – try to taste these side-by-side from bottle!). I love the ample frame and the silky sense of layering together with the crystalline purity of each layer. Highly stratified and architectural with lovely grip from the crumbly chalky tannins from below. Accessible already but with considerable aging potential, this is one of the stars of the vintage and a reflection both of the path towards the summit of this property and of its great terroir. 93-95+
Château Berliquet
Château Berliquet (Saint-Émilion; 60% Merlot; 39% Cabernet Franc; 1% Malbec – for the first time; a final yield of 43 hl/ha with a little loss from mildew and a strict selection before anything went into the vats; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then at Château Canon on the final day of the week of the primeurs). Impressive. Creamy, full and quite rich and highly expressive aromatically with lovely iris and violet florality alongside the dark stone and berry fruits. Cassis with aeration. The creaminess is even more evident when tasted alongside Canon at the property. It’s subtle at first and a little introvert. It’s as if it needs the time to prepare us for the gorgeous, but again cool and subtle, intensity over a narrow frame of the palate. Incense and candlewax. Not a colossus at all, but delightfully lifted and crystalline. I like this a lot, above all those tactile, pixilating calcaire tannins. 92-94+
Château Boutisse
Château Boutisse (Saint-Émilion; 92% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Franc; 3% Carménère; 2% Cabernet Sauvignon; a super terroir on the argilo-calcaire plateau; 13.5% alcohol). Rather lovely, with the powdery limestone minerality that one picks up on the palate already very evident even from the aromatics – predominantly intense dark berry fruits, with a little cherry stone. There’s a lovely leafiness to the Cabernet Franc which rises through the more lush Merlot core. There’s a pleasingly natural sweetness to this too, rare in the vintage. Quite narrow on the attack, but very shapely – indeed, sinuous. The fruit glides graciously along a well-defined back bone revealing in the process those tactile fine-grained limestone tannins. A very eloquent expression of its terroir and a great success. This is a property that is now on a steep upward ascent. 91-93+
Château Cadet Bon
Château Cadet Bon (Saint-Émilion; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). This probably gets the prize for the wackiest new label (and this is only day 2 of my en primeur tastings)! Intensely floral, almost to the point of caricature. But I quite like that. We’re definitely in the parfumier’s workshop cooking up an essence or two – here of violets and lavender, rosemary and peony bulb. Plush, pulpy and charged with dark cherry and assorted other stone fruits. This is ambitious and whilst I really like the clarity of the attack and mid-palate, it does turn a little dry on the finish. Very distinctive. 90-92
Château Canon
Château Canon (Saint-Émilion; 78% Merlot; 22% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 44 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin, re-tasted at Château Canon). A little fuller and a little more herbal and darker berry fruited than Berliquet but cut at least from the same stylistic cloth. The fruit profile is more expansive – ranging from loganberry and raspberry, in finely pixilated detail, to bramble and a little cassis and even damson. More ample in frame and even more crystalline in the mid-palate than Berliquet. Gracious. Elegant. Hyper-stylish and charged with a lovely racy acidity and that cool cedar touch. A lovely menthol note too on the finish interweaving with the cassis. Even fuller and richer when re-tasted a week on. Quite chewy on the finish indicating the significant aging potential here. 93-95+
Château Canon La Gaffelière
Château Canon La Gaffelière (Saint-Émilion; 43% Merlot; 43% Cabernet Franc; 14% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin; re-tasted at the property with Stephan and Ludovic von Neipperg). Iron rich in its minerality – or that is the impression – this is characterised aromatically by a dark and more plummy fruit, the darker berries coming through more in the background and with aeration. A little wild sage and oregano is picked up when re-tasted at the property. As that suggests, this is a complex wine, more than most, and it evolves and opens in the glass. Lithe and succulent, quite energetic and dynamic in the mid-palate. Not the sustained intensity of recent great vintages, but well-managed. Fuller and richer when re-tasted at the property, this is nicely mouth filling – pushing at the cheeks with generous cashmere layers. Linear on the finish but never strict. 92-94
Château Cap de Mourlin
Château Cap de Mourlin (Saint-Émilion; 79% Merlot; 16% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; pH 3.57; 13.5% alcohol; Jean-Philippe Fort is the consultant here; tasted three times, the second time at the UGC press tasting, the third at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Graphite, cedar and a very classical cassis and black berry fruit tell us immediately where this comes from. The palate is soft and engaging, the tannins ripe and yet agile and tactile, pulling and pushing the fruit along the spine and elongating the finish in the process. Not at the level of the 2020 or 2022, but a very creditable showing in this vintage – better still when re-tasted at the UGB press tasting. 91-93+
Château Chauvin
Château Chauvin (Saint-Émilion; 68% Merlot; 32% Cabernet Franc – the highest in the estate’s history; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Very true to its recent identity and with all that Cabernet Franc, this is elegant and lithe in its florality and it feels pure, lifted and aerial. That impression is conveyed to the palate which has a lovely glassy crystalline purity to it. Quite a delicate, light touch but that is massively rewarded in a vintage like this. 91-93
Château Cheval Blanc
Château Cheval Blanc (Saint-Émilion; 46% Merlot; 48% Cabernet Franc; 6% Cabernet Sauvignon; a vineyard yield of 39 hl/ha, reduced to 28 hl/ha in the tanks after strict densimetric sorting; tasted at the property with Pierre Olivier Clouet). “A vintage from the 1970s vinified with 21st century techniques”, says Pierre Olivier Clouet – as ever, he’s right! Gorgeous aromatically. Lifted, plump, plush, succulent, very classical in a way – cedar, graphite, pencil-shavings, dark berry and stone fruits. Black cherry, bramble and blackberry, a little cassis and blueberry, above all with just a little aeration in the mouth. Much more ample than Petit Cheval and with a gorgeous natural sweetness. Walnut, almost frangipane and a little gentle toasted note. Very gathered on the finish. Very fresh, above all with a gently lift towards the fantail that forms the finish and releases the sapidity. Vivid but also classical and stylish in its elegance – but not a manufactured elegance. Poised, coiled and very promising. 95-97+.
Château Corbin
Château Corbin (Saint-Émilion; predominantly Merlot with a little Cabernet Franc; very low yields due to slow veraison leading to coulure and millerandage which necessitated densimetric sorting to eliminate unripe fruit and botrytised grapes; the final assemblage was easy; aging in a combination of oak barrels, concrete vats and wine globes; 13.25% alcohol; tasted with Annabelle Cruse Bardinet at the property). A lovely viscosity and an enticing deep purple in the glass. Articulate and eloquent and so fresh aromatically, with wild thyme and a little touch of wisteria alongside the beautiful dark cherries and damsons that immediate project themselves from the glass. A delicate note of cedar too. In the mouth this is soft, lithe, limpid and quite plush and plump. It has a nice ample frame, cashmere texture and a little dusting of tannin around the edge. A pleasing ripeness, a vivacious freshness and a delicate and subtle harmony. Overall this has great elegance and I find it very true to the recent style of this wine that is not as well-known as It should be. Very gracious. Tactile tannins pixilate the finish. 92-94
Château Côte de Baleau
Château Côte de Baleau (Saint-Émilion; 95% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; pH 3.7; 13.5% alcohol; the sandy terroir did not make the grade for the final assemblagement; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Quite delicate with a subtle floral note that is enticing. Gentle and soft, with quite a sweet berry fruit, a little cherry too, nicely detailed if more and more fresh towards the finish. Crumbly tannins, but just a little hint of dryness. Overall, nicely managed if a little slender in frame 88-90.
Château Croix Cardinale
Château Croix Cardinale (Saint-Émilion; from the 3.75 hectares of the southern-facing slopes of the Fleur Cardinale estate and made by the same team; 50% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Franc; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 37 hl/ha; 13% alcohol). This is very lifted, aerial and pretty aromatically – with delicate but at the same time intense radiant floral notes – lily, lilac and peony, a little violet too. And it’s the violet that we pick up on the palate. It seems to intermingle with the intensely dark purple berry fruits. So pure and precise with that lovely touch of tactile limestone tannin. A great terroir expression. The first vintage of this that really and truly convinces me. 92-94.
Château Croix de Labrie
Château Croix de Labrie (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon – massal selection; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 22 hl/ha after coulure on an old Merlot plot; picked in 5 separate tries; optimetric and densimetric sorting were both crucial, the latter set at 11.5% of potential alcohol; pH 3.38; 13.5% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; tasted at the property with Pierre Courdurié). Vibrantly punk purple in the glass and radiantly aromatic. Walnut oil, kalamata tapenade. Red and black cherry, blueberry and black berry. A little wild bramble and loganberry, all in pixilated detail. This really pushes at the cheeks, with a very ample frame and broad sheets of pure fruit interspersed with ultra-fine but grainy chalky tannins. Less obviously oaky that it used to be. A wine with impressive breath and amplitude. Milles feuilles layers of silk and cashmere – almost alternating – and lovely tactile and grippy limestone and chalky tannins. This is very well done. 93-95+.
Château Dassault
Château Dassault (Saint-Émilion; 67% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 3% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 28 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Unusual in the context of the vintage aromatically, with a lighter hued fruit profile – more red berries and red cherries and less florality than is often exhibited here. Glossy, even succulent, in the mouth, this pushes the cheeks and fills the mouth with juicy fruits. More dynamic and energetic still when re-tasted at the property. Lacking a little in complexity, but this is tactile in its vibrant fresh juiciness and also very refreshing. 91-93
Château de Candale
Château de Candale (Saint-Émilion). I quite like this. It’s simple and accessible, the extraction very well managed, achieving both a sense of depth and layering on the one hand but without any trace of dryness or astringency on the finish. This is quite classical if with no great complexity. But it’s certainly been well made. 88-90+
Château de Ferrand (
Château de Ferrand (Saint-Émilion; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). This is excellent. Sleek, slender with a lovely combination of violet florality and cedar, rendering it cool and glacial at the spherical core. That core is rendered more evident by the fine-grained chalky limestone tannins that beautifully enrobe it like an artist’s pencil strokes. Rather subtle, very elegant and rather beautiful. 92-94
Château de Fonbel
Château de Fonbel (Saint-Émilion; 65% Merlot; 31% Cabernet Sauvignon; 4% Carménère; tasted at Ausone with Constance Vauthier). After the Simards this is more classical. It has a broader frame but one nicely sculpted by the calcaire tannins, it’s sapid and juicy with a greater range of primary fruits – red and darker berries primarily. Denser at the core and with a little more acidity than the Simards which you have to accept to enjoy this. Gracious tannins and a pleasing clarity and precision. 89-91
Château de Pressac
Château de Pressac (Saint-Émilion; 62% Merlot; 18% Cabernet Franc; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; 1% Petit Verdot; 2% Carménère; 1% Malbec; tasted twice, first at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Quite oaky in its aromatics, with vanilla pod the first note to register. A blend of red and darker berry fruits – from loganberry to mulberry – all finely detailed but all a little smothered in oak and oak smoke. The palate is nicely layered and there’s a pleasing levity to the structure, but it’s just a little chewy and dry on the finish – if not aggressively so. 88-90
Château Destieux
Château Destieux (Saint-Émilion; 66% Merlot; 17% Cabernet Sauvignon; 17% Cabernet Franc; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). One of the more floral of the grands crus classés at this stage in the vintage, with that florality rather reinforced and underscored by the oak, still yet to be incorporated fully (but it is just a matter of time). This is pure, fresh and with decent mid-palate density. The acidity is well-integrated too, but it’s considerable and it seems also to gather a little on the finish. That accentuates the sense of freshness but turns this just a little dry. 89-91
Château Faugères
Château Faugères (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 36 hl/ha; from a 38.4-hectare vineyard on a combination of the limestone plateau (asteria limestone subsoil) and a limestone and clay slope (limestone soil on clay-limestone molasse); aging in oak barrels of 225 and 300 litres, a third new; 13% alcohol; tasted at Peby-Faugères with with Vincent Cruège). More serious than Cap de Faugères (tasted before). Seriously pure and focussed, with quite a narrow frame densely charged with fresh fruits – here more purple and black than Cap’s red cherries and berries. There’s a touch of ferrous minerality. There’s graphite too and the oak is both very moderate and very well-integrated. The calcaire tannins give this great length. Tense and rippling and very long on the linear finish. Excellent. Classy in its new, far less oaked style. A pleasing mentholated lift on the finish and the grip of the chalky tannins. 91-93.
Château Figeac
Château Figeac (Saint-Émilion; 39% Cabernet Sauvignon; 28% Cabernet Franc; 33% Merlot; a final yield of 31 hl/ha after the use of densimetric sorting to deal with the consequences of the long floraison followed by optimetric sorting, with 21% of what was harvested rejected from the 36 hl/ha picked; pH 3.66; 8% vin de presse; 100% new oak as usual; 13% alcohol; tasted at the property with Frédéric Faye and members of the family). Perhaps the most beautiful nose of the entire en primeur campaign at this stage. Gloriously elegant and enticing. So naturally expressive without any need for aeration. Gently sweet-scented with a note of saffron and walnut alongside the black cherries, damson and blueberry fruit profile. Violet and peony, wisteria and lily. With aeration this becomes a little fresher with the proportion of berry fruits seeming to rise as the cherries and fruits of the forest recede just a little. That gives a hint as to the tension and the source of the tension in the wine. The oak is present and there is a subtle hint of vanilla but it serves to support the gentle florality – wisteria and lily of the valley above all. With aeration, too, more and more cedar. On the palate, assorted dark berries but also, less present on the aromatics, raspberry, loganberry and strawberry. Ample in its frame, spherical and pushing at the cheeks, yet always retaining the purity and the precise crystallinity that sets this apart as really one of the wines of the vintage. The oak is still integrating but this is just a question of time. 95-97+
Château Fleur Cardinale
Château Fleur Cardinale (Saint-Émilion; 72% Merlot; 21% Cabernet Franc; 7% Cabernet Sauvignon; from the 26.5 hectares of the northern-facing slopes of the Fleur Cardinale estate and made by the same team; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol). A fascinating contrast to Croix Cardinale, these really do need to be tasted side-by-side (as I had the opportunity to do). They’re cut from the same cloth, but somehow woven differently. This is floral too, but a little more demonstratively – it’s more the florality of the rose petal, though there are touches of violet here too. There’s a lot more graphite and cedar too and one has the impression of more oak (brilliantly incorporated). This is richer and fuller, a little more ample and even more gracious in a way. I love them both and it’s difficult to choose between them; this probably has a little more aging potential. 92-94+
Château Fleur de Lisse
Château Fleur de Lisse (Saint-Émilion; 69% Merlot; 31% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; from Vignobles Jade; the consultants here are Jean-Claude & Jean-François Berrouet; certitied organic and biodynamic). I have something of a soft-spot for these wines and they shine in 2024. The Bien-aimée de Fleur de Lisse is already a delightfully aerial, fresh and vibrant introduction. After that the grand vin comes as no disappointment. Indeed, it’s gloriously vibrant with very great red berry fruit purity and incredible lift. In the mouth this almost more resembles a fine white. It’s light and insubstantial in a way and some will clearly want for mid-palate heft, but for me this is a delightful, delicate, refined and elegant wine that expresses the vintage with great eloquence and acumen. I’m also a sucker for that pure Cabernet Franc aromatics and the tender juiciness that it imparts on the sapid finish. 91-93
Château Fombrauge
Château Fombrauge (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 26 hl/ha; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). This must come in the heaviest bottle on the market. Lithe, plush and engaging ,with a dark berry fruit – bramble, blackberry and a little blueberry too. It’s very pure and unadulterated and the oak influence is very subtle. It lacks the delineation in the mid-palate of the very best and neither is it especially complex, but you know where this comes from and it’s likely to represent good value. A touch dry on the finish. 89-91
Château Fonplégade
Château Fonplégade (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon; from a comparatively large vineyard of 18.4 hectares farmed biodynamically on a mosaic of limestone and clay terroirs next to what is now Quintus; aging in new and one-year oak barrels, cement eggs and amphoras; certified organic and biodynamic). This is fabulous and quite distinctive, if not entirely unlikely its neighbour, Quintus. Broad and ample in frame, with a lovely damson and bay leaf aromatic signature. Lots of crunchy small berry fruits too – from the fresher redcurrants and blackcurrants by way of the plumper brambles and mulberries to the richer, sweeter, darker cherries that come through more and more with aeration and the passage of time. Graphite and a hint of cedar. Glossy in its texture on the attack, with fine-grained yet beady, grippy tannins that seem to grate at the silken surface of the spherical core that the fresh fruit forms in the mouth. As they do so, they massage the fruit and disrupt the surface tension, releasing an intensely sapid juiciness. Another great success and another very tactile and dynamic wine from Fonplégade. 92-94
Château Fonroque
Château Fonroque (Saint-Émilion; 62% Merlot; 38% Cabernet Franc; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). A very pure cassis and blackcurrant fruit, really intense and captivating. There’s an earthy mineral note too and a slightly wild herbal and heathery note. Pure and precise with lots of focus on the palate too, but with incredibly fine-grained beady tannins – a little like Franc Mayne. This has been getting better and better in recent years and I’m very impressed by this in 2024. 92-94
Château Fontfleurie
Château Fontfleurie (Saint-Émilion; 62% Merlot; 38% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of around 27 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; from Vignobles Jade; the consultants here are Jean-Claude & Jean-François Berrouet; certitied organic and biodynamic). Another lovely wine in this vintage from Vignobles Jade that exudes its biodynamic values in its vivid and vibrant, lithe and energetic fruit-forward style. In comparison with Fleur de Lisse, this is just a touch more austere, there’s a little more girth and substance in the mid-palate and the wine is a little less lifted, despite the slightly higher proportion of Cabernet Franc. Probably not for those who prefer to spread their Saint-Émilion on toast, but for those enthusiastic to explore a more aerial style, this is an excellent starting point. I’m reminded a little of Fonplégade at least stylistically. 90-92
Château Franc Mayne
Château Franc Mayne (Saint-Émilion; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Intensely floral, one has the impression of being with the parfumier in her laboratory but then of being transported to the underground crypt of the cathedral in the presence of incense, myrrh and candlewax. Walnut shell and walnut oil; cedar and graphite. I like the very vertical structure defined by the tactile trace of the calcaire tannins – it’s like a limestone mineshaft! But it’s also beautifully sapid and limpid, the fruit gliding and dancing in the confined spaces accorded to it by the beady tannins. Great! 93-95
Château Grâce Dieu des Prieurs
Château Grâce Dieu des Prieurs (Saint-Émilion; 64% Merlot; 36% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; malolactic and aging entirely in new Radoux Super Fine Blend barrels; Louis Mtjaville is the consultant oenologist here). I like this very much. This is always a singular wine, whose identity is often highly shaped by the Radoux blend casks here, rather like Tertre Roteboeuf but from a rather different type of Saint-Émilion terroir. In this lighter and more aerial vintage the oak is still present and distinctive, but it’s very well managed – like everything here. Dried and fresh rose petals, parfumier’s essence of violet and a little lavender, saffron and hazelnut accompany the plump perfectly ripe red and darker berry fruits. Light and agile on the palate with plenty of energy and a certain vivacity, this will be relatively early drinking and really quite ethereal. 92-94
Château Grand Barrail Larmazelle Figeac
Château Grand Barrail Larmazelle Figeac (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol). This, too, is very well-made. More red berry fruited than most with a subtle sprinkling of sweet spice and very authentic and true to its terroir, as it true really now with all of the Dourthe wines. I find this pure, precise and quite linear on the palate. It balances the challenges of the vintage well to produce a wine that will drink well young but which also holds decent aging potential too. 91-93
Château Grand Corbin
Château Grand Corbin (Saint-Émilion; 86% Merlot; 12% Cabernet Franc; 2% Cabernet Sauvignon; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). A little closed aromatically at this stage which means that it’s really the oak that one picks up first, with then a bunch or two of fresh red and darker berry fruits. In the mouth this has a rather narrow frame, but that renders it a lot more dense and concentrated on the palate. A simple, but engaging black cherry and bramble fruit, with a little wild thyme. Plush and pulpy but quite lifted too, this is a success in the context of the vintage 89-91
Château Grand Corbin-Despagne
Château Grand Corbin-Despagne (Saint-Émilion; 84% Merlot; 12% Cabernet Franc; 2% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13.3% alcohol; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Enticing and alluring in its aromatics, even if they are a little closed and introvert at first when tasted under leaden skies at Dassault. Damson, damson skin and blueberry, a little blackcurrant too and just a few black cherries. On the palate this is quite compact, with a lovely clarity to the mid-palate and a sense of layering absent in all but the best of the grands crus classés in this vintage. Poised and elegant, long and gently tapering on the finish. 91-93+.
Château Grand Mayne
Château Grand Mayne (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 13.7% alcohol). In general I am a big fan of Grand Mayne but this wine has me slightly equivocating. On the one I love the aromatics – dark berry fruits, with plenty of plump blueberry and that lovely leafy/stalky/herbal/floral Cabernet Franc signature, a touch of graphite, a hint of cedar and a little walnut shell. I love too the refined and gentle opening and the glossy, polished tannins. But, on the other hand, it turns increasingly dry on the finish just when I am about to sign off on an effusive tasting note. I’m reassured a little when I re-taste it at the UGC and I nudge up my rating accordingly. But it does still lose a little of the shape it has on the attack. I’ll be keen to reassess this from bottle as so much of it I really like. 90-92+
Château Haut Sarpe
Château Haut Sarpe (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). From Joseph Janoueix. Bright red berry fruits and a gentle sprinkling of sweet spices, a few sprigs of lemon thyme. Some wild moorland floral notes too. This is quite lifted and aerial for Haut Sarpe and I like the sense of energy. Well made, with a pleasing sense of balance and with a lovely sapid finish – not the elevated acidity and slight astringency of many. 89-91
Château Haut-Brisson
Château Haut-Brisson (Saint-Émilion; 18 hectares on clay-limestone, fine gravel and fine brown sand; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 37 hl/ha; pH 3.5; 13% alcohol; tasted at Bellefont Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Dark briary fruits. Pure and precise, clear with a great sense of clarity and precision. Limpid and lithe but with both more natural sucrosity and more substance than any of the non Saint-Émilion wines – the layers are of cashmere rather than silk. Chewy on the finish but accessible early, as it should be. 89-91+
Château Haut-Simard
Château Haut-Simard (Saint-Émilion; 80% Cabernet Franc; 20% Merlot; picked in multiple passages through the vineyard; tasted at Ausone with Constance Vauthier). This has more Cabernet Franc than Jean Faure and as much as Le Dôme! The surprise of the Vauthier tasting at Ausone, it’s very distinct composition giving it a glorious aromatic signature that really wows – of blueberries and mulberries and a little blackcurrant and white currant blossom. A little orange blossom too and blood orange. Slender in its frame, but spherical at the quite dense core, which is nicely enrobed with dark stone and croquant juicy berry fruits. It’s simple in a way, but pure and gracious and highly accessible. Above all, it feels like a very direct and authentically respectful expression of all that is lovely about this vintage. This could be excellent value and it’s also likely to wreak havoc in a blind tasting! In short, it ticks many of my boxes. 92-94+
Château Jean Faure
Château Jean Faure (Saint-Émilion; 65% Cabernet Franc; 30% Merlot; 5% Malbec; pH 3.56; 30% new oak; certified organic and biodynamic; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at a négociant tasting and then from a sample sent to me in Saint-Émilion). Impressive, as ever, even if this remains a property a little under the proverbial radar. But if you are in any doubt as to the quality of the terroir here, just have a look on the map. Bulby in its redolently Cabernet Franc florality. Peony. Lilac. Fleur de figueier. When re-tasted there’s also a hint of grated dark chocolate. Soft, supple and with a luxuriously soft entry (‘attack’ would be too aggressive a term here) that disguises at first the depth, density and compactness of this wine. Gloriously lush and fresh with fine-grained silky/cashmere tannins. Lifted on the pinched finish. Tactile. Sapid. 92-94+
Château L’Etampe
Château L’Etampe (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; from Vignobles Jade; the consultants here are Jean-Claude & Jean-François Berrouet; certified organic and biodynamic). This is a little richer and in a way more classical than Fleur de Lisse and Fontfleurie in this vintage and it doesn’t have quite the same sense of lift and energy. One almost senses, but I may well be wrong, that the vintage was more tricky here on the more alluvial and sandy soils of this part of the appellation. The palate is a little less precise and focussed and the finish just a little less shapely and sapid 89-91
Château La Clotte
Château La Clotte (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; final yields of 22 hl/ha; tasted at Ausone with Constance Vauthier). A little more closed aromatically that Moulin St Georges (tasted just before). Walnut oil. Kalamata olives and tapenade. Damsons and plums, a little bramble and black berry. Redcurrant and cranberry. Moderate concentration and a lovely shape in the mouth. A certain creaminess but less than in the sunnier of the more recent vintages. Chewy on the finish. Very fine, but not at the level of the 2020 or 2022. 91-93
Château La Commanderie
Château La Commanderie (Saint-Émilion; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Another excellent wine from the Decoster stable, this is lithe and quite open-textured, with plenty of amplitude on the attack and the sensation of layering, with the beady, grainy tannins doing the work of delineating each stratum. A bright and crisp berry and stone fruit and lots of character. 90-92
Château La Couspaude
Château La Couspaude (Saint-Émilion; 75% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; 14.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Very floral in its aromatic profile – with lovely violet and parfumier’s essence of violet and rose notes richly enrobing the dark cherry and blueberry fruits. Very enticing. Lovely cedary notes too. A trace of walnut shell and a hint of espresso bean. Succulent and broad-shouldered on the attack and crystalline in the mid-palate. The only issue here is that, just on the finish, we pick up a slightly dry grain from the tannin. But this is still an excellent showing. 91-93+
Château La Croizille
Château La Croizille (Saint-Émilion; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Slender, but stylish and with a lovely very ‘Cabernet Franc’ fruit profile, above all in the mouth – leafy, stemmy (but never green) blueberries and cassis. The aromatics are actually, for now, rather more red fruited but also very pure and precise. The mid-palate is lush and yet the narrow frame gives just enough space for eddies of fresh Cabernet fruits to ripple upwards from below giving interest and texture and rendering this very tactile. I love the delicacy. The best I’ve tasted from here. 92-94.
Château La Dominique
Château La Dominique (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 31 hl/ha; pH 3.56; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting). Quite distinctive aromatically, with quite a pronounced ferrous and saline note to the minerality when tasted both times. It’s quite meaty too. We almost have smoky bacon crisps, if you remember those. If you do, you should try them with dark berry and stone fruit – this vintage of La Dominique suggests they go very well together! Plush and quite luscious on the attack, above all when tasted alongside the other grands crus classés, this is very impressive texturally. Ample, plump, succulent and extremely juicy on the refreshing vintage, this is a great success. 92-94+
Château La Fleur Morange
Château La Fleur Morange (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Plump black cherries, freshly plucked at perfect ripeness in all their succulent juiciness. A little hint of walnut shell and olive tapenade. A touch of graphite. This is narrowly framed by the limestone tannins and that gives this a sense of depth and gravitas – density too – that many lack. Velvety and rather seductive in its way. Quite gracious too. It’s nice to see this very much on form in 2024. 91-93
Château La Gaffelière
Château La Gaffelière (Saint-Émilion; 60% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; a little vin de presse but not much and assembled early; pH 3.55; 13.5% alcohol, with no chaptalisation but a little reverse osmosis to intensify the body and volume; tasted at La Gaffelière with Alexandre de Malet Roquefort). Picked late despite the risk of botrytis. Pretty and very open aromatically with an intense peony florality. A little mimosa too. Some rose petals. A very dark fruit – black cherry and black berry and bramble, all plump and al dente. Cassis with aeration. The slow extended extraction was important as was the densimetric sorting. There’s a lovely very natural sweetness on the attack and then the glorious blueberry and violet notes from the Cabernet Franc breaks through the surface, bringing energy and lift. Grippy, sapidity-releasing beady calcaire tannins complete the picture. 92-94+
Château La Marzelle
Château La Marzelle (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13% alcohol; certified organic; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Violets, peonies and a lovely waft of cedar. A hint of walnut oil, more usually found in riper vintages and maybe a little Kalamata olive tapenade. Black cherry and mulberry fruit. Plush and with very soft yet tactile tannins, this glides effortlessly over the palate. The steep upward progression here continues, certainly when one takes note of the challenges of the vintage. 91-93+
Château La Serre
Château La Serre (Saint-Émilion; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then again in the offices of JP Moueix in Libourne). Blackcurrant and cassis, red and black cherry, a little hint of kirsch even, this is very pure and refined. Sandalwood. I love the fruit signature here and the way in which the freshness reinforces the sense of pixilation and detail. It’s like a grand master’s painting of fruits in still life – except more dynamic than any static image or canvas. Excellent, certainly given the challenges of the vintage. This comes from a top terroir and this is a top wine from a top terroir in a challenging vintage. 91-93+
Château La Tour Baladoz
Château La Tour Baladoz (Saint-Émilion; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). A lovely very pure and precise raspberry and loganberry fruit and silky but still grippy tannins. This is similar in form in the mouth and style to its sister property, La Croizille, but the fruit profile is entirely different. The two make a lovely study in terroir expression. Fresh in all the right ways, if without quite the layered complexity of neighbour and sibling. 90-92+
Château La Tour Saint Christophe
Château La Tour Saint Christophe (Saint-Émilion; from 23 hectares on the clay-limestone plateau and coteaux above Tertre Roteboeuf; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; pH 3.35; 13% alcohol; tasted first at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then at Bellefont-Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Damson and blueberry, in almost perfect pixilated purity. A little Griotte cherry too and those crumbly, grippy, chalky limestone tannins rendering this so architectural and structured on the palate. A study in terroir and a wonderful contrast to Bellefont-Belcier. Excellent. Not dissimilar in style to Laroque. These two are great value picks from the calcaire heights of the appellation. 92-94+
Château Laforge
Château Laforge (Saint-Émilion; 92% Merlot; 8% Cabrnent Franc; pH 3.08; 13% alcohol; from Jonathan Maltus). This has a pleasingly ripe, gently and naturally sweet, red berry fruity aromatic profile. There’s a little graphite too. Like Teyssier, this has not been pushed and is very delicate for Laforge to the point that I would not pick it blind. I miss the ferrous mineral signature that I often associate with Laforge but I am impressed by the choices made here. Harmonious and accessible if not exactly a grand vin de garde. 88-90
Château Larcis Ducasse
Château Larcis Ducasse (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 41 hl/ha at the picking date but reduced by c. 17% with densimetric selection, no coulure but an extended floraison; aging in oak, 50% of it new; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and re-tasted at the property with David Suire who has taken on the direction here since last year). The wonderful blue clay in the terroir plays a crucial role here as does the Southern exposure on the Côte Pavie. Very pretty and very refined, much more so than it used to be, this is poised and elegant, cool-scented and intense in its combination of incense and violet, rose petal and myrrh accompanying and enrobing and enrichening as it does so the intensely dark berry fruits. There’s graphite by the nuclear reactor core load. But everything here is so refined. There’s cedar on the palate, too, above all with gentle aeration in the mouth. Gorgeous aromatically and brilliant in its purity, this is a wine that almost brings a tear to my eye. This transcends the vintage and shows the colossal potential of this exceptional terroir. The gentle grip and structuring touch of the calcaire tannins as the wine caresses the palate is sublime. 95-97
Château Larmande
Château Larmande (Saint-Émilion; 88% Merlot; 12% Cabernet Franc; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Iris and peony and a saline ferrous minerality combine here with the red and darker berry fruits. There’s a little wild herbal note too. Fresh, sapid and lively in the mouth with lovely swirls of additional freshness released as if from below. The tannins draw the fruit ever more closely to the spine and that helps give this an intensity it would otherwise lack. 91-93+
Château Laroque
Château Laroque (Saint-Émilion; brilliantly situated atop the rocky plateau of Saint-Laurent; 98% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; a vineyard yield of 40 hl/ha, but only 44% making it into the vat due to the strict optical and densimetric selection; tasted first at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then with David Suire at Larcis-Ducasse; no vin de presse; 50% new oak; pH 3.48; 13.4% alcohol). Delicate and so refined. So pure and precise too in its red and then darker berry fruit signature – at first loganberry and raspberry, then mulberry and bramble. This is a little more nutty than Larcis, tasted just before. It’s fresher too and a little less sunny with a slightly darker berry fruit – a touch of loganberry too that is not present on the Côte Pavie. That renders this more taut and tense and that is reinforced again by the calcaire tannins that structure and sculpt the wine vertically. What is also impressive here is the layered viscosity – very rare in the vintage – which makes this rather special. With aeration there’s more and more blackcurrant and the fresh lift that brings – I’m almost reminded or Ribena from my childhood. A study in fruit purity and so brilliantly juicy on the finish. A lovely liquorice note too on the finish. 93-95
Château Laroze
Château Laroze (Saint-Émilion; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Excellent. Cassis and raspberry, beautifully fresh and finely detailed – like the still life painting of a grand master. This is plump, plush and yet well delineated and almost pixilated in its detail in and through the mid-palate. A lovely handling of the vintage – fresh and vibrant rather than strict and austere. The best performance from Laroze for me in recent vintages. Very pure and intense and well-sustained on a long and very linear finish. 91-93+.
Château Lassègue
Château Lassègue (Saint-Émilion; from a property of 24 hectares on the coteaux of Saint-Émilion below de Ferrand and opposite Tertre Rôteboeuf; 45% Merlot; 49% Cabernet Franc; 6% Cabernet Sauvignon; pH 3.6; aging in oak barrels from 15 different French forests, 60% of which are new; 13.1% alcohol, with 0.3% from chaptalisation; tasted at the property). Just the second vintage in which the Cabernet is in the majority. Lush, deep, rich and fully ripe with an aromatic opulence and swagger that I find rare in the vintage. Black cherry, a touch of walnut and deep dark berry fruits, all quite briary. The oak use is very subtle. The blueberry, violet and peony florality is very beautiful and the leafy Cabernet Franc signature is very profound. Ample, pushing at the cheeks and very full in the mouth, with the calcaire tannins pulling the wine downwards and grounding it in the soil, giving this great gravitas. For that to happen it needs something to grab onto and it has it here as there is considerable density and depth and concentration without any dryness or tartness at all. The southern/south western exposition here really helps. There’s a wondrously juicy, sapid eloquence to this. Very energetic. 93-95.
Château Le Prieuré
Château Le Prieuré (Saint-Émilion; 95% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; pH 3.4; 13.4% alcohol; tasted at Calon-Ségur). Beautiful aromatically and a little restrained. Elegant and not over-oaked. Quite rich and ample on the attack, but with something of a dip in the mid-palate. Glossy and crystalline at first, the tannins just a little dry on the finish. The product of a very fine terroir but one senses perhaps that this is still a work in progress. 90-92
Château Magnan la Gaffelière
Château Magnan la Gaffelière (Saint-Émilion; 65% Merlot; 35% Cabernet Franc; from 8 hectares on a clay-sand terroir; 13.5; Hubert de Bouärd consulting; certified organic). Succulent, fresh, with lots of evident Cabernet Franc character. A touch oaky. Quite rich and plump, a spherical core generously enrobed and with pleasingly chewy tannins. Slightly dry on the finish. 87-89
Château Mangot
Château Mangot (Saint-Émilion; 64% Merlot; 34% Cabernet Franc; 2% Cabernet Sauvignon; just up the hill from Faugères in the wilds of Saint-Émilion close to the appellation boundary with Castillon; Thomas Duclos is the consultant here; certified organic). Plump and plush with a lovely very expressive dark and quite rich dark cherry and berry fruit, a little damson and blueberry fruit too. Spherical at the core and nicely packed with fruits – dense and compact. Vivid and vibrant with the wood already very well integrated. Excellent. Sapid on the finish. A wine of a simple purity and pleasure. This is likely to represent excellent value. 91-93.
Château Monbousquet
Château Monbousquet (Saint-Émilion; 65% Merlot; 20% Caberner Franc; 15% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 25.8 hl/ha; pH 3.77; 13.6% alcohol). Less oak and a subtle change in style! This has a dark plum and berry fruit, a little graphite, and a certain iron element to the minerality. Quite sweet-fruited, plush and plump, with a generously enrobed quite dense spherical core. Nicely managed and well-sustained on the finish. A new passage is in the process of being taken here perhaps. I prefer this to recent vintages. 90-92
Château Montlabert
Château Montlabert (Saint-Émilion; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 50% new oak; pH 3.8; 13.5, 0.5% from chaptalisation; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then at the property with Ludovic Hérault; certified organic). Blueberry and black cherry. Graphite and fresh pencil shavings. Glossy for the vintage and with a lovely sense of plush, plump depth and gravitas. Dense and compact, layered and with cashmere-soft tannins. Nice ripeness. The spherical core is densely packed with crisp crunchy fruits. Maybe not quite the pixilation of the 2020 or 2022 but this is very well done and it will also be accessible early. 91-93+
Château Montlisse
Château Montlisse (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Another grand cru classé sporting a rather swanky new label for the new vintage. Assorted dark plums, damsons and loganberry vie for attention with the wild herbal notes – thyme and a little rosemary. Succulent and juicy on the palate with plenty of energy and vivacity, this is bright and dynamic. It manages the vintage well and will be accessible early. 90-92.
Château Moulin du Cadet
Château Moulin du Cadet (Saint-Émilion; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; pH 3.55; IPT 65; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Brambles, blackberries and damsons, subtle floral hints and a little graphite. The oak is moderated and well-integrated, but present. A little strict and very linear with a well-defined central spine to which the fruit is tightly bound aiding the impression of impact and density. Crumbly ripe tannins on the finish. This has been well-managed. 91-93
Château Moulin Saint Georges
Château Moulin Saint Georges (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; tasted at Ausone with Constance Vauthier). As we move up the range we encounter more density and concentration. This has a dusty earthy terroir minerality. It’s juicy and sapid with the same slightly elevated acidity that one finds in de Fonbel. Lifted, aerial, croquant in its fruit signature. This slightly loses its shape on the finish with a slight drop off in the clarity of the fruit. But I love the quite creamy blueberry and black berry fruit and iris and iris bulb florality. There’s a touch of cedar with aeration. 91-93
Château Pavie
Château Pavie (Saint-Émilion; 51% Merlot; 32% Cabernet Franc; 17% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 24.1 hl/ha; pH 3.68; 13.6% alcohol; tasted at the property). Very limestone in its aromatic profile and signature contributing to the sense of verticality and lift. Blueberries and black berries, brambles and fruits of the forest and, of course, those Pavie cherries. Graphite and freshly grated dark chocolate. A hint of heather. Violet. And also just a suggestion of ferrous minerality. This is more ample than Arômes but not massively so. Very spherical in form in the mouth with almost a blackhole density at the core. Yet this is, above all, gracious, quite fluid and almost sinuous for Pavie. It tapers gently on the finish after the grip and release of the crumbly chalky tannins. Fabulous. The southern exposition of the parcels on the famous Côte Pavie make this feel more sunny (solaire) than almost all other wines of the vintage. 95-97
Château Pavie Macquin
Château Pavie Macquin (Saint-Émilion; 84% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; 1% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This has parted company stylistically from Larcis Ducasse over the past couple of years and here I find it at first one of the oakier of the samples, though that oak is just in the process of folding into the deep, dark richness of the mid-palate. Black cherry and damson, a little blueberry. Walnut and toasted almond, frangipane. Bold, rich and naturally sweet with plenty of spice bringing interest. Broad-framed with the fruit a little more stretched than in sunnier, fuller vintages. Never forced but the tannins I find just a little stern on the finish. 91-93+.
Château Peby-Faugères
Château Peby-Faugères (Saint-Émilion; 100% Merlot; from two mid-slope parcels in the larger Faugères vineyard in Saint-Étienne de Lisse on a south and south-eastern sloping clay-limestone terroir; vinified entirely separately from Faugères; a final yield of 25.5 hl/ha; aging in French oak barrels, 50% of which are new; tasted with Vincent Cruège at Peby-Faugères). Much sweeter – but very naturally so – and much more ample than Faugères. Creamy and a little oakier with a hint of toasted brioche alongside the dark cherry and bramble fruit. Cassis and black currant with aeration. A little oyster shell and iodine. The tannins are so incredibly soft, an impression reinforced by the relatively narrow frame. This is cool and dense and compact at the heart of its crystalline core. It’s like a crystal clear well at night with the moonlight illuminating the clear reflective surface. Juicy and fresh and sapid and rippling on the finish. 93-95
Château Petit Faurie de Soutard
Château Petit Faurie de Soutard (Saint-Émilion; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Vying with Grand Barrail Lamarzelle Figeac for the longest Bordeaux Château name! Quite pure and precise with a very clean, ripe but crunchy, bright red and darker berry fruit – raspberries and mulberries, black berries too. Quite slender in frame and without the density or compactness of the stars of the appellation, this is nonetheless fine and very refined. Offering a lot of pleasure and for early drinking. 90-92.
Château Petit Val
Château Petit Val (Saint-Émilion). A mix of plum, red and darker berry fruits. A little marjoram and oregano. Some vanilla and assorted sweet spices from the oak that has still yet fully to incorporate (but it’s just a matter of time). The tannins are grainy and very tactile and they serve to pixilate the mid-palate, but at the same time seem to disrupt the flow of the wine over the palate. Not the strongest recent vintage from here, but its challenges seem to have been well coped with. 87-89
Château Peymouton
Château Peymouton (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). Bright, crunchy berry fruits. Fresh but not astringent, quite crystalline in texture with the fruit distributed generously over quite a narrow frame. A little slender but nicely managed. The acidity picks up a little on the finish but this is sapid and crisp and lively if lacking in density and concentration. Simple and accessible. 88-90
Château Pierre 1er
Château Pierre 1er (Saint-Émilion; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 45 hl/ha). Not a wine I know well, though I have passed it several times on the way in from Libourne. Dark berry fruited, quite plump, a tight frame and with a fresh and herb-encrusted fruit that I like a lot. It’s simple but very well made with crumbly tannins on the finish, just on the right side of ripeness. 87-89.
Château Pindefleurs
Château Pindefleurs (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). A little richer and creamier than Peymouton and with a little cherry alongside the darker berry fruits and the crunchier red berries. It’s similarly slender in frame, a little etiolated and quite simple in form. The tannins are never dry but a little granular towards the finish. 88-90+
Château Puyblanquet
Château Puyblanquet (Saint-Émilion; just 12 of the 19 hectares here are in production with significant replanting underway; the property is just in front of de Pressac, next to Boutisse, on the high limestone plateau; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabnernet Franc; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; pH 3.48; 13.4% alcohol; tasted at La Gaffelière with Alexandre de Malet Roquefort). Aromatically very pretty with bright, croquant black cherry and blueberry fruits. A nice natural sweetness, even with the slightly elevated acidity. Pure and lithe, the fruit generously filling what is quite a narrow frame. Linear and quite precise. Long and tapering, with the flow over the palate moulded and shaped by the plateau and coteaux calcaire tannins. 90-92+
Château Quinault L’Enclos
Château Quinault L’Enclos (Saint-Émilion; 63% Merlot; 17% Cabernet Franc; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon; tasted at Cheval Blanc with Pierre-Olivier Clouet). Dark berry fruits. A little damson, a touch of black cherry. Wild herbs. Bay leaf. Cassis and black currant. Thyme and rosemary. Quite chewy with grippy tannins. A lot more vertical than horizontal range, the frame a little narrow and with almost a touch of dryness on the finish. This will not be released en primeur. 91-93
Château Quintus
Château Quintus (Saint-Émilion; 77.2% Merlot; 22.8% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of around 34 hl/ha, though that’s an average over the total production of the three wines; this, the grand vin, represents just 21% of that production; 13.1% alcohol; tasted at the property with Mariette Veyssière). The vineyard is less precocious here and so there were fewer problems of uneven florairon. This is gloriously floral. Saffron, lilac and lily of the valley. It’s gloriously radiant and vibrant too, with lots of vertical range. And it has a very refined and delicate shape and texture in the mouth. It’s lifted, light and aerial with a lovely natural sweetness and great fluidity. It exudes poise and harmony. There’s an impressive viscosity to this too. As that suggests, it’s deceptively powerful, the deception coming from the sheer quality of the tannins. Very eloquent and articulate and very respectful of the vintage, this is a wine that is not trying to be something it is not. And I love its sense of minerality. 93-95
Château Rocheyron
Château Rocheyron (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Bouchet; a final yield of 33 hl/ha; pH 3.54; 13.2% alcohol; 10% new oak; situated on the plateau; tasted with Peter Sisseck and Mathieu Raveraud, the estate manager at the property; densimetric sorting was crucial; Axel Marchal and Valérie Lavigne are the consultants here). Lovely and glossy in the glass, with an impressive viscosity and a brilliant sheen. Fresh and bright, vivid, lifted and aerial. Cassis, black currant, blueberries, a touch of cherry, graphite and maybe a hint of acacia. In the mouth a little more redcurrant. Very pure, precise, clear and crystalline. There’s a subtle hint of peony and maybe lily of the valley too – a very fresh florality. And, with aeration, there’s more cedar. This is so utterly gracious in the mouth, more so than I was expecting. Goosepimples are my physical reaction to this. The grip of the tannins pinches the easy flow of the fruit producing a second wave and then a third. I find this fascinatingly tactile and engaging. It’s really vivid and vibrant texturally. With each touch and grip of the tannins there is a release of freshness. The challenge of the élévage here is just to capture the sheer beauty of this wine. I can’t wait to re-taste it. 96-98
Château Rol Valentin
Château Rol Valentin (Saint-Émilion; 78% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; 8% Cabernet Sauvignon; re-tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Quite sweet aromatically, but the oak is not at all demonstrative, though it’s certainly present on the finish. Dark and brighter red berry fruits, a little plum skin and some cherry – bringing the natural sweetness to this. Sandalwood too. Fine-grained tannins structure this over the palate to a sapid, slightly chewy finish. There’s a nice ripeness, but it perhaps lacks a little interest in the mid-palate. 89-91.
Château Saintayme
Château Saintayme (Saint-Émilion; 100% Merlot; 30% new oak; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time with Noëmie Durantou at L’Eglise Clinet). This is great! Lovely pure black currant, pixilated in its detail and with a crunchy bite and freshness to it. A touch of ferrous minerality. Texturally this is very pure and crystalline but without this being slight or slender in any way. I love the subtle florality too that I have never detected here before. There’s a lovely limestone granularity to the tannins and a pleasingly chewy sapidity on the finish. As good a vintage of this as I can recall. 90-92
Château Sanctus
Château Sanctus (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 24 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; Derenoncourt consultants; in organic conversion).The sample is somewhat reductive at first making this a little tricky to assess; the sample was also quite warm. Plums and damsons, a few blueberries and a crushed rocky limestone minerality. Creamy but tense and taut. All of that comes from the crumbly, textural, even architectural tannins that restrict the amplitude the fruit wishes to take and strap it to the spine. Long and gently tapering on the finish as a consequence. This is very fine but it lacks the complexity of the greatest recent vintages. But it tastes like where it comes from and that’s important. 91-93
Château Sansonnet
Château Sansonnet (Saint-Émilion; 86% Merlot; 7% Cabernet Franc; 7% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 34hl/ha; pH 3.45; IPT 66; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Introvert and slow to express itself aromatically, but very fine and elegant in a way that is rare in this vintage. There’s a subtle hint of graphite and cedar that coils itself around the very dark berry fruit rather seductively. The oak is gently supportive and this is one of the few wines to have a delightful natural sweetness in the mid-palate. Crystalline and sinuous on the finish, this is deeply impressive in the context of the vintage. 92-94
Château Simard
Château Simard (Saint-Émilion; 50% Merlot; 33% Cabernet Franc; 15% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Petit Verdot; tasted at Ausone with Constance Vauthier). Red and blue berry fruits. Lifted and quite aerial. A lovely touch of pink rose petals and stamens. Bright and crunchy in its fruit signature with a lovely juicy sweetness and freshness. Direct, pure and crystalline. Simple in its way, but lovely. 90-92
Château Soutard
Château Soutard (Saint-Émilion; 55% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; 9% Cabernet Sauvignon; % Malbec; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Another aromatically explosive wine, even at this early stage, with floral notes projected vertically from the glass – iris, peony and violet, a little lavender and rosemary too. Cedar and cassis join the party in the mouth. The intensity of this on the palate is impressive, a vividness reinforced by the relatively narrow frame. Succulent and juicy. I’m a fan. 91-93+.
Château Tertre Roteboeuf
Château Tertre Roteboeuf (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 13.5% alcohol; aging in 100% new oak in Radoux Super Fine Blend; tasted from barrel at the property à la Bourgignon!). Fascinating. Coal dust, toasted brioche, pain grillé, bracken, pot pourri, confit rose petals, roasted almonds and a hint of walnut oil. Fresh fig. Wonderfully fresh on the attack and spherical at the core, with a tight and taut frame generously enrobed in floral and spicy elements from the wood that break the surface of the sphere through the grip of the tannins. Texturally fascinating; utterly distinctive; unique, indeed. And rather special in this vintage – even though you might have difficulty picking the vintage in a decade’s time. 93-95
Château Teyssier
Château Teyssier (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.10; 13% alcohol; from Jonathan Maltus). Nicely done. This is gentle, attractive, accessible and, above all, doesn’t try to be more than can be. The frame is slender but that means that the spherical core is well-defined and nicely charged with a crunchy and quite intense dark berry fruit. The oak is nicely moderated and there’s an impressive precision to this though it does lack mid-palate density. 87-89
Château Tour Saint Pierre
Château Tour Saint Pierre (Saint-Émilion, near Dassault on a sandy-clay terroir; 89% Merlot; 11% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol). Nicely round and plump, with ripe dark berry fruits, the Cabernet Franc particularly expressive. Juicy, with a well-defined central core that is nicely-filled with bright crunchy small berries. A little oaky at this stage but that gently reinforces the florality. There’s a touch of sweet spice too. A wine the is very much in the character of the vintage. 87-89
Château Troplong-Mondot
Château Troplong-Mondot (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 13% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 35 hl/ha after very strict densimetric sorting [the vineyard was picked at around 45 hl/ha]; botrytis was the major issue not mildew or uneven floraison; pH 3.38; 13.5% alcohol; 55% new oak and with more foudres replacing the second-fill barrels; tasted with Aymeric de Gironde at the property). This is incredibly impressive and really shows the value of limestone terroirs in a vintage like this. A little introspective at first. Dark fruits of the forest with a certain creaminess, a little black cherry (darker than Mondot), brambles, mulberries and black raspberry. All very pure and pixilated in their detail. One of the most concentrated and compact wines of the vintages with a density in the mid-palate that is very rare. Just a little black currant and that leafiness with aeration, above in the mouth. Crystalline in texture but, unlike many of its peers, this is velvet, not the light silk or cashmere of, say, Clos Fourtet or Beau-Séjour Bécot. One of the greatest successes in a tricky vintage. I love the dark-fruited blackhole core around which the fresh juiciness circulates, releasing eddies and ripples of freshness. Vibrant and energetic. Vivacious. This grows in the glass with more and more black cherry fruit and more and more graphite to accompany it. Big, bold, plump and plush but never austere and not at all over-loaded. This remains wonderfully delineated and with great precision and clarity sustained all the way to the asymptotic finish. 94-96+
Château Trottevieille
Château Trottevieille (Saint-Émilion; 56% Cabernet Franc; 41% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Sauvignon; 14% alcohol; tasted at Batailley with Frédéric Castéra). Pretty with that seamless core of very dark Cabernet Franc fruit (planted at 44% but always more present in the final wine) imparting notes of blueberry, mulberry, red and black cherries. Violet and peony with aeration. Juicy and succulent, sapid and lithe. The finest tannins, the greatest amplitude and the most crystalline core of any of these wines. Very juicy. Accessible already despite the considerable limestone architecture supporting this – rather like the cellar carved from the chalk below. Very shapely and structured on the finish and yet long and lifted. 92-94.
Château Valandraud
Château Valandraud (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 6% Cabernet Franc; 9% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin with very consistent notes). Very true to its style even in this challenging vintage, but still a wine that will be easy to pick in a vertical in future years for its somewhat elevated acidity. There’s nothing wrong with that and it brings a pleasing sense of crunchiness to the fruit and a tense and charged vibrancy to the mid-palate. But it does cut the richness of this revealing that comparative lack of density vis-à-vis other recent vintages. Fresh, crunchy and with a radiant confit violet note this is certainly one of the vintage’s successes. 92-94.
Château Villemaurine
Château Villemaurine (Saint-Émilion; 83% Merlot; 11% Cabernet Franc; 6% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 41hl/ha; pH 3.40; IPT 65; 13% alcohol; tasted three times, the second time at the UGC press tasting and then again at the AGGCSE at Dassault, better each time). Almost a note of coconut alongside the bright, again crunchy, berry fruits. Blackcurrant, a little blueberry and cassis. Wild herbal notes too. A hint of shoe leather. There’s quite a lot of fruit intensity here and good depth and density, the tannins too are soft and fine-grained. Whilst the first sample lacked the precision and delineation in the mid-palate that we’re now accustomed to from Villemaurine, the second, served a degree or two cooler, was much more crystalline, sapid and precise, as was the third. This will need a little time in bottle and I’ll be keen to follow its progress. I’m giving this the slight benefit of the doubt for now. 91-93
Château Yon Figeac
Château Yon Figeac (Saint-Émilion; 74% Merlot; 17% Cabernet Franc; 1% Cabernet Sauvignon; 8% Petit Verdot; 14% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Plump and plush, with dark stone fruits, predominantly damson, with a little bramble. Quite ample in frame with traces of oak seemingly gathering around the edges. But the breadth draws attention to the loss of density in the mid-palate. This is almost trying to be more generous than the fruit allows for. Gently extracted, however, and nicely balanced with no astringency. 88-90
Clos Badon Thunevin
Clos Badon Thunevin (Saint-Émilion; 60% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Franc; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Intensely floral, with lovely lilac and peony notes, a little suggestion of violet too and wild lavender. Crunchy black currants and black berries, all very fresh and finely detailed, with cassis coming through with aeration in the mouth – along with a little graphite and cedar. A great success in the vintage and showing a lot of technical prowess. 91-93+.
Clos Cantenac
Clos Cantenac (Saint-Émilion; 100% Merlot; 13.3% alcohol; around 6000 bottles, just a third of the total production). A brutal selection here has produced an impressive wine in the context of the vintage. Refined and quite delicate aromatically, with graphite-inflected dark and lighter berry fruits, a hint of sweet spice to bring additional interest and a sprig of thyme. On the palate this is nicely shaped, the tannins fine-grained and gently sculpting the wine through the mid-palate. At this stage the finish is a little more shapeless and there is a slight suggestion of dryness too but I think this will resolve itself during the élévage. If it does so this might well merit an upgrade. 89-91
Clos de Sarpe
Clos de Sarpe (Saint-Émilion; 78% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; certified organic; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then again at the property with Maylis Marcenat). The excellent work continues here. This is wild and distinctive in personality, with a lovely deep black cherry, bramble, mulberry and blueberry fruit, a very subtle hint of oak but no more and sprigs of freshly harvested wild herbs. Graphite and a hint of cedar with aeration. There’s a vivid peony and lilac florality too is carried from the aromatics on to the palate. Sapid and juicy, tender, broad and long on the finish. The only slight issue is a shade towards a touch of dryness on the finish. But this has been nicely achieved. 91-93
Clos des Jacobins
Clos des Jacobins (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 18% Cabernet Franc; 2% Cabernet Sauvignon; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). The best of the Decoster stable wines this year, as it should really be given the quality of the i from which it hails. This is pure and crystalline, the oak very well integrated and well-moderated. It is layered, yet limpid and lithe, even sinuous in the mid-palate and it has a nicely lifted, quite aerial finish. 91-93+
Clos Dubreuil
Clos Dubreuil (Saint-Émilion; 70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; a strict selection and a final yield of just 25 hl/ha; from 6.9 of the 8.5 hectares under vine on the argilo-calaire plateau of St-Christophe-des-Bardes; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). Though the acidity is a little elevated, the pH probably very low, this manages the vintage well. It has quite a lot of substance and amplitude and a deep, dark berry and stone fruit that even has a certain natural sweetness to it. There’s a pleasing wild herbal and heather note too bringing additional interest and, in a vintage with the accent on austerity, this comes across as succulent and quite generous. 91-93
Clos Fourtet
Clos Fourtet (Saint-Émilion; 84M; 10CF; 6CS; floraison was the problem here where the yields were lost due to the need for strict selection; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; pH 3.43; 13% alcohol). Selected from the limestone plateau exclusively. We change register here. Clos Fourtet in 2024 is intensely floral, but in the most subtle and delicate of ways. Wisteria and orange blossom, a little lilac too. More and more cassis with aeration. Wild thyme. Graphite. A wine that is very aromatic and lifted in that aromatic profile. Soft, subtle, delicate and highly refined but also very natural – not polished or worked. Glorious in the mouth, this is more ample than you expect and less austere too – without ever being sweet, it is soft and smiley. Luminous, crystalline and clear, pure and precise with that lovely under-labouring of the crumbly limestone tannins that break up the clarity from below bringing great interest and encouraging the fresh sapid fruit juices to descend the cheeks like tears down the side of a glass. Very delicate but very complex texturally. Very tactile. The density is hidden but it’s there. A real coup de coeur and expressing a real empathy between terroir and vintage. 94-96+.
Clos La Gaffelière
Clos La Gaffelière (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; pH 3.6; 13.3% alcohol; tasted at La Gaffelière with Alexandre de Malet Roquefort). Fresh and darkly fruited, with blueberry and bramble, a little stone fruit too. Vibrant, with a somewhat elevated and racy acidity but because it’s nicely enrobed in fruits that we expect to have a high acidity this feels very natural. Impressive for what it is. Nicely managed. The class of the wine comes from the quality of the tannins. 88-90
Clos St-Martin
Clos St-Martin (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; from 1.37 hectares on a brilliant argilo-calcaire over pure limestone terroir, now the second smallest of the classed growths; a final yield of 33 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; Julien Viaud is the consultant here; tasted twice, first at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault and then re-tasted at the offices of JP Moueix in Libourne). An easy pick just from the aromatics alone (as confirmed at the blind tasting of the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion wines). There’s always a little more oak here than with its neighbours, but it’s so well integrated at this address and it reinforces so beautifully the natural florality of this terroir whilst underscoring the cedar and graphite notes that I always associate with Clos St-Martin. Peony. Peony bulb. Violet. Dark cherry and dark berry fruits. This feels like it comes from an altogether sunnier vintage. It’s radiant, lifted and aerial, vibrant and dynamic and yet has considerable depth and some concentration. A brilliant wine, above all in the context of the vintage – it seems to defy the challenges it posed. 93-95
Couvent des Jacobins
Couvent des Jacobins (Saint-Émilion; 78% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; 7% Petit Verdot; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the Association des Grands Crus Classés de St-Emilion press tasting at Dassault). This is very impressive and consolidates the upward path this property has been charting over recent vintages, consulted by Thomas Duclos. Quite rich and supple for the vintage, with a lovely sweetly-scented damson, black cherry and dark berry fruit. Much less chunky and foursquare than one it was, with gracious soft and ultra-fine grained tannins, still with that calcaire grip, imparting shape to the wine and pulling the fruit back to the spine. Architectural and with lovely fresh sapidity on the finish. This uses the natural acidity of the vintage so very well. When set in the context of the vintage, this is the best I’ve tasted from here. 91-93+
Croix Canon
Croix Canon (Saint-Émilion; 59% Cabernet Franc; 41% Merlot; 13% alcohol). From parcels on the coteaux and lower plateau around Mazerat just before the chapel. Fresh and pure with dark berries and raspberry, a hint of sandalwood and acacia. Lifted, quite aerial but with a nice density nonetheless, reinforced by the rather less ample frame. Tight and tense, tender and remaining fresh and linear on the finish. 90-92
Croix de Beauséjour
Croix de Beauséjour (Saint-Émilion; 95% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 28 hl/ha; 3% vin de presse; 13% alcohol). Very punk pink at the rim. Blue/purple at the core. Subtle, elegant, lightly floral with lots of rose petal and some fleurs de vigne; blue and purple fruits. Blueberries and damsons, a little herbal element too. The leafy Cabernet is very delicate and expressive. Glassy in texture, the mid-palate composed of fine sheets of silk, quite ample in the frame and multiply-layered. A little touch of crumbly chalky limestone tannins. Fresh and croquant on the finish. A great introduction to the grand vin. 91-93
L’Excellence du Clos des Menuts
L’Excellence du Clos des Menuts (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Cabernet Franc). As the name implies, this is a micro-cuvée from the 5 hectares of the Clos des Menuts vineyard. Creamy with an engagingly pure, gentle red berry fruit profile – raspberry and a little loganberry. Soft and gentle on the attack, with ultra-fine grained tannins, this has been very nicely managed. It’s fully ripe, there is no astringency and this has a cool and focussed precision. It’s also quite crystalline in texture. It’s light and aerial and will be accessible young. Fresh, fruity and quite lifted. 91-93
L’If
L’If (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.37; 13% alcohol; parcels next to Troplong Mondot and also from Puyblanquet; a final yield of 39 hl/ha after the all-important densimetric sorting; bleeding of the tanks reduced the final production by around 15 %; a little chaptalisation to raise the alcohol from 12.5%; picked at the start of October in three days; tasted with Jacques Thienpont at Le Pin). The Cabernet Franc is very beautiful here. Intense dark berry fruits. Acacia and graphite. A touch of grated chocolate and dark cherry. A little hint of violet too. This is gracious, full and constructed around quite a dense but compact lozenge-shaped core of cool dark berry fruits. It’s not too ample, accentuating the sense of impact. The calcaire tannins are very delicate and this is much more lush and plush than most plateau-based wines in the vintage. 92-94
La Closerie de Fourtet
La Closerie de Fourtet (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc, rather more than normal; pH 3.56; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at Clos Fourtet with Mathieu Cuvelier). From the more clay-rich of the parcels. I love the floral note here. It’s very distinctive and already hints at what we will find in the grand vin. Gentle on the attack with the most fine-grained and delicate of tannins. Refined, elegant, lifted and with an excellent signature of the property. Supple and succulent, juicy and fresh. 89-91
La Mondotte
La Mondotte (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at Canon-La-Gaffelière with Stephan and Ludovic von Neipperg). Lovely dark blueberry and black cherry fruits, a hint of the black forest – and its gateau. A touch of graphite and a little hint, but not more of pencil-shavings. Glacial in its crystalline core. Ample, again, like all of the von Neipperg St-Emilions in 2024, very pure and precise and deeply layered – like the strata revealed in a cliff face. Quite architectural for the vintage but at the same time lifted and aerial, bright, crisp and intensely sapid on the finish, where the. Cabernet Franc notes really reveal themselves. 93-95
Le Dôme
Le Dôme (Saint-Émilion; 80% Cabernet Franc; 20% Merlot; pH 3.86; 13% alcohol; from Jonathan Maltus). We are in the kingdom of Cabernet Franc here and this has a most gorgeous aromatic profile – lavender, violet, confit violet, fresh and dried rose petals and the parfumier’s essences of all of the above generously enrobing the plump blueberry and black cherry fruits. Graphite and a little cedar for good measure. This has a less ample frame that Vieux Château Mazerat and is more chiselled by the limestone tannins – indeed, it feels much more like a vin de terroir. Though it’s quite linear and architectural, it’s never stern nor austere and this is a great success in the vintage 93-95
Le Dragon de Quintus
Le Dragon de Quintus (Saint-Émilion; 78.5% Merlot; 21.5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of around 34 hl/ha, though that’s an average over the total production; this, the second label represents 40% of the production; 13% alcohol; tasted at the property with Mariette Veyssière). Darker and more profound than the third label, with more black cherry and even a little black forest gateau. Some blueberry from the Cabernet Franc. This has a bulby iris and peony florality that is very enticing. Much more ample and layered. The acidity again present but nicely distributed across the strata that form the mid-palate of the wine. The grainy tannins from the limestone bedrock give this a vertical range that it well-sustained towards the finish. Despite that, it’s light and aerial. 91-93
Le Petit Cheval
Le Petit Cheval (Saint-Émilion; 72% Merlot; 28% Cabernet Franc; tasted at Cheval Blanc with Pierre-Olivier Clouet). Very much a ‘petit’ Cheval in the most positive sense of the term. The Cabernet Franc expresses itself really well here in a classical frame set by the Merlot. Lovely al dente ripeness, not a terribly ample frame, but with a lovely soft succulent core fully charged with fresh cherry and berry fruits. Blueberries and cassis. Sapid and juicy with a gracious evolution over the palate. It is like a slightly more tempered version of the classic grand vin. Very balanced and harmonious and rippling in its freshness towards the finish. 92-94+
Les Astéries
Les Astéries (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.55; 13.5% alcohol; from Jonathan Maltus). Always a fascinating wine to taste in any vintage and in 2024 I really like this. It’s redder berry fruited than usual, with a little red and darker cherry too. There’s a lovely dollop of graphite and a trickle of walnut oil. Less imposing on the attack than it often is, but we are still very much in the realm of astéries limestone tannins, imparting a chiselled, structural verticality to this. Over the less ample frame of the 2024 that works really well. I like too the clarity of the mid-palate and the crystalline and limpid texture. Some might crave more volume in the mouth, but I’m happy to trade that for the detail and delineation that is more evident here. Finely-balanced and well-judged. 91-93+.
los de l’Oratoire
Clos de l’Oratoire (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at Canon-La-Gaffelière with Stephan and Ludovic von Neipperg). Black cherry. Blackcurrant. A little blueberry and that stalky leafiness of the Cabernet Franc, above all with gentle aeration in the mouth. Here we move from sheets of silk to cashmere, with a little more density and depth and with the calcaire tannins entering between the strata. I love the uplift of sapid freshness that I find in the mid-palate. This is vibrant and very pure if perhaps lacking a little complexity in comparison with the 2020 or 2022. 90-92
Lucia
Lucia (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of just 22 hl/ha from 2.9 hectares on a combination of argilo-calcaire and gravel-sand terroirs; the oldest parcel here was planted in 1901, explaining in part the low yields; aged in oak barrels, 20% of which are new; Julien Lavenu is the consultant here). Lush and gracious, elegant and poised, this is a very impressive wine in the context of the vintage, with quite a viscous core of red and dark cherry and berry fruits. There’s a hint of heather and wild herbs too. The mid-palate is succulent and shapely, the tannins incredibly finely-grained, even if they reveal a little dryness on the finish. 90-92+
Mondot
Mondot (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc, with the young wines ultimately destined for the grand vin making their first appearance; tasted at Troplong Mondot with Aymeric de Gironde). Lovely. Lifted. Aerial. Glossy. Fresh and hyper-crystalline. Explosively articulate aromatically. Griotte cherry. Cassis and blackcurrant. A little loganberry. Cedar and a little graphite. This has a bright and crunchy purity and is succulent and juicy in the well-sustained and nicely-filled mid-palate. 91-93+.
Muse du Val
Muse du Val (Saint-Émilion). The cuvée speciale from Petit Val and a wine that in 2024 signals its ambition with quite a lot of sweet oak that has yet to be incorporated but which does draw attention to the floral elements here – violets and confit rose petals. One senses quite a strict selection. The fruit is fully ripe and there’s a natural sweetness to this that doesn’t all come from the oak. That said, the richness of the mid-palate that almost transcends the vintage does come at the expense of a little dryness on the finish. This will need time and I’ll be interested to re-taste after its élévage. 89-91
No. 3 d’Angélus
No. 3 d’Angélus (Saint-Émilion; 85% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 45 hl/ha; pH 3.55; 13.5% alcohol, with just 2 vats chaptalized; tasted at Angélus with Benjamin Laforet). Sandalwood. Blueberry and raspberry, a little loganberry and mulberry. Very plush and precise, pixilated and crystalline. Quite ample in frame for No. 3 with lovely, thin, silky – yet glassy/glossy – sheets of silk layered one on top of another with the chalky tannins entering between the layers and dusting the edges. A little touch. Fluid and aerial, ethereal and lifted, very stylish and elegant. Not, of course, the density of recent vintages but excellent texturally and beautifully tactile. Fresh and pure. 90-92+.
Petit Cantenac
Petit Cantenac (Saint-Émilion; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc). Quite toasty aromatically, with a blend of red berries, predominantly loganberry and cherry fruits. There’s a nice ripeness to this, a gentle sweet spice and a lushness to the mid-palate that makes this quite hedonistic for the vintage. Impressive. 87-89.
Saint-Émilion de Quintus
Saint-Émilion de Quintus (Saint-Émilion; 92.8% Merlot; 7.2% Cabernet Sauvignon; tasted at Quintus with Mariette Veyssière). This is Quintus’ third label and you rather expect it to contain all the left-overs. But that would be to give entirely the wrong impression. This is, in fact, pure. crystalline, lithe and limpid. Dark berries and a little cherry. It’s plush and plump, very ripe and with very soft and gently enrobing tannins which have a little grip and shape to them. The acidity is well-distributed and never too ‘edgy’. In short, this is accomplished and accessible. 88-90.
Vieux Château Mazerat
Vieux Château Mazerat (Saint-Émilion; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.67; 13% alcohol; from Jonathan Maltus). Impressive. This is a wine that I sometimes find over-oaked, but the oak use is nicely moderated here and it helps accentuate both the ripeness and natural sweetness of the black cherry and bramble fruit and the subtle peony florality. Plush, plump and ample for the vintage on the attack, with quite considerable density and layering – again, rare in 2024. But, crucially, this comes without the sense that this has been pushed and without the dry tannins that characterise so many wines where the ambition has overcome the need for restraint. Quite hedonistic. 92-94

Pomerol

Blason de L’Evangile
Blason de L’Evangile (Pomerol; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 21 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the property with Juliette Couderc). Iron in its minerality. Rich and full, plump and quite full and very true to the new Evangile style. There’s a nice nuttiness to this that is also a signature of the grand vin. A pleasing sense of ripeness too. Not a very ample frame but it is generously enrobed with lovely dark berry and cherry fruits. Not the delineation or detail of the grand vin but still very impressive, even if there’s a little dip in intensity in the mid-palate. Quite chewy and saline on the finish, with a touch of liquorice. 89-91
Château Beauregard
Château Beauregard (Pomerol; 67% Merlot; 24% Cabernet Franc; 9% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 22.5 hl/ha; pH 3.65; 13% alcohol; certified organic; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then at the property with Lauren Laudrin & Vincent Priou). The first in the Pomerol flight at the UGC and we know immediately where we are – in fact, this is an easy pick and that’s a good thing to be able to say in this vintage. Violet and pink rose petals, blueberries, blackcurrants and damsons, a little graphite and blanched almonds. Soft, gentle, with gracious tannins outlining the parameters of quite an ample frame. Juicy and quite sumptuous for the vintage in the mid-palate if lacking the complexity of the bigger, richer recent vintage. 91-93+
Château Bonalgue
Château Bonalgue (Pomerol; 93% Merlot; 7% Cabernet Franc; a final field 33 hl/ha after densimetric sorting with problems of coulure particularly present; pH 3.5; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first with Jean-Baptiste Bourotte at Clos du Clocher). Gracious with more fruit complexity than Monregard La Croix, the cherries and blueberries joining the damsons and plums. There’a lovely trace of graphite too. The vein of gravel here helped this deal with the excess rainfall, aiding the final yields. This has a nice sense of fluidity over a broad frame but plenty of depth and a lovely natural sweetness. It’s juicy and sapid with similarities to the 2020 but with more acidity on the finish (the marker of the vintage). The Rpulse extraction works really well here. This used to have quite rustic tannins – not at all in this vintage. 91-93+
Château Bourgneuf
Château Bourgneuf (Pomerol; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). Peony and a hint of violet, blueberry and mulberry with a little black cherry. This is quite ample and pretty extracted in the context of the vintage. But, as a consequence perhaps it comes across as both a little blitzed and blended in its fruit profile and there is a something of a dip in the mid-palate suggesting the fruit has been stretched over too ample a frame. The tannins are soft and gracious and there is much to like here with no dryness or astringency, but this is not at the level of recent vintages. 89-91
Château Certan de May
Château Certan de May (Pomerol; 70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; tasted at JP Moueix in Pomerol). Lovely. Grace and poise with an utterly beguiling cedar and blueberry aromatic profile, a little hint of violet. The palate, as if often the case here, is a little blocky and foursquare but that is, in a way the signature of a property often difficult to assess en primeur. There are quite considerable tannins, still yet fully to integrate but a great deal of potential. A vin de garde that needs a good 10 years. 92-94
Château Clinet
Château Clinet (Pomerol; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This I really like. It’s very true to its identity and also to its terroir signature, if actually a little closer stylistically to L’Eglise-Clinet than it used to be. Intensely floral, with beautiful notes of violet and essence of violet. A touch of dark chocolate. Black cherry, blueberry and walnut oil. Toasted brioche. Cedar, cedar and more cedar. I love the aromatics. On the palate it’s more ample on the attack than as it evolves, with the tannins, always beady and grainy, taking the fruit in charge. That gives this quite a dynamic sense of structure missing in all but the best wines of the vintage. Really excellent. A great success. Approachable young but with considerable aging potential. 93-95+
Château Croix de Gay
Château Croix de Gay (Pomerol; 97.5% Merlot; 2.5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Ferrous in its minerality, as ever – very crasse de fer! A little oyster shell and iodine and then, too, a distinct hint of horsehair and straw. Very distinctive. Quite ample on the attack and that gives the fruits the space to glide and dance, rendering this more crystalline that in vintages with more density. You have to like the mineral signature of the terroir here, but this is very well made. 90-92
Château de l’Evangile
Château de l’Evangile (Pomerol; 80% Merlot; 19% Cabernet Franc; 1% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 21 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the property with Juliette Couderc). A little closed for now. Puissant, bold, round and rich. Serious in the context of the vintage but not in terms of austerity, just in terms of amplitude and range and depth and profundity. Black cherries form the core of this but within that core we have lovely more lifted notes of black currant and bramble. With aeration lovely cassis too. I find this very ‘plateau Pomerol’ in its ripeness. Nutty, as ever. Powerful but refined, with that dusting of salinity that one finds in Blason too. Sapid and with an added sense of energy that seems to come from the organic viticulture. 92-94
Château de Sales
Château de Sales (Pomerol; tasted just the once at a négociant tasting). Glossily textured. Polished. Soft, cool and dark fruited at its tight, spherical core. This is very Cabernet in its fruit profile. A wine of lovely freshness, purity and precision, delicate and refined and never pushed or overdone – the product of excellent choices and sensitive winemaking. 91-93
Château Fayat
Château Fayat (Pomerol; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; from around 40 different parcels on a variety of terroirs, amounting to around 12.7 hectares; a final yield of 39hl/ha; pH 3.65; 14.5% alcohol). There has been a lot of excellent work going on here in recent vintages and I hope this property will soon start to acquire the attention it merits. It is a sister estate to La Dominique in St Emilion and there are evident similarities in both the style and the steep upward trajectory. This feels like the vintage in which it all comes together. The intensity of the violet florality really wows, as does the beautiful blueberry fruit signature. And there’s cedar too. The tannins are ultra-refined and glossy, and this is long and balanced. Possibly the best I’ve ever tasted from here and to achieve that in the context of this vintage is special indeed. 92-94
Château Feytit-Clinet
Château Feytit-Clinet (Pomerol; 88% Merlot; 12% Cabernet Franc; from a well-situated vineyard just down the hill from Clinet and Eglise-Clinet and opposite Latour à Pomerol; a final yield of 33 hl/ha; pH 3.70; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first from a sample sent to me in Bordeaux). Initially quite oaky at this early stage but with a deeply impressive core of intense crushed dark berry and stone fruits – blueberries and black cherries – and, as it opens, the oak seems to be replaced by the violets. Beautiful. I liked the 2023 very much and I love this too. It’s one of the sweeter wines in and through the mid-palate which makes it seem like a bit of a vintage outlier, but those confit floral elements are very true to Pomerol, and, in a way, this seems to transcend the challenges of the vintage. 92-94
Château Gazin
Château Gazin (Pomerol; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 23.4 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). I come to this with a certain sense of anticipation, as it’s a wine that seems to be in the process of changing its style and identity. In fact, here I find it very true to its terroir – a nice balance between the past and the present. It’s certainly more restrained, elegant and balanced than it was, more floral and refined and the accent on the ferrous minerality of old is replaced here with an accent on floral notes – violet and rosewater. The fruit is succulent and juicy and there’s impressive density but without losing the fluidity and sinuousness of the vintage. Pure, precise and crystalline, this is very impressive. It’s on the verge of losing its shape just before the finish, but the pinch of the tannins, the release of juicy freshness that follows gathers this back up into a lovely plume that gives this added length. Nicely managed. 92-94
Château Guillot-Clauzel
Château Guillot-Clauzel (Pomerol; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 33% new oak; 13.5% alcohol). This has lovely gravel terroir notes, like its neighbour Le Pin in a way, but with the lift and freshness and directness of Vieux Château Certan! Very pretty aromatically. Fleurs de vigne. A more bulby floral note too – peony and wisteria. This is a little more red berry fruited than VCC. It’s also more crunchy (croquant) and has great authority and purity. Red cherries and cherry blossom. Wild strawberry. A little blueberry. On the palate this it vertical, tense and taut from the start but with more softness and gravitas lower down the palate where the tannins, a little like Le Pin gather up the fruit, drawing it towards the bottom of the palate. Really special and very close to the level of VCC, if with a slightly different fruit profile. Purity, precision and finesse. 94-96
Château L’Église Clinet
Château L’Église Clinet (Pomerol; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; aging in oak barrels, 85% of them new; 13.8% alcohol; tasted with Noëmie Durantou at L’Eglise Clinet). A brilliant achievement from Noëmie Durantou and Olivier Gautrat. If anyone was going to rise to the multiple challenges of this vintage it was going to be them. They have. Initially introvert and subtle. It demands calm respect, and you have to come to it. A little spiritual in a way. It’s refined and very beautiful, with a delicate and beguiling florality – incense (as in La Petite Eglise), but just a little more here, violets, rose petals and peony, all very fresh. Black cherries, blueberries, mulberries and black berries, again as if painted in pixilated detail. Graphite and cedar enrobe the fruit but also allow it the space it needs. There’s a slight hint of wild freshly picked herbs and even a touch of heather. Texturally sublime. Incredibly soft on the entry, but that softness comes as even more of a surprise because of the intensity, density and compactness of the mid-palate. Spherical at the core, with pixilating tannins that help one focus in on and pick out the details from the dense cylindrical core of the palate. As it opens, however, it’s as if one starts to pick out the velvet layers and that changes a little the impression of the form and structure of the wine, rendering it both more ample and accentuating the sense of depth and profundity. A wine that transcends the vintage. Unique and rather different in its identity than the other superstars of the Pomerol plateau; it’s actually more like Petrus than anything else (but the Cabernet Franc really speaks here too). Gracious and ethereal yet serious, intellectual and in great harmony with the vintage. 95-97+
Château L’Enclos
Château L’Enclos (Pomerol; 88% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 2% Malbec; certified organic and in conversion to biodynamic, this is the sister property of the rising star that is Fonplégade in St Emilion; situated on the western slope of the Pomerol plateau; aged in oak barrels, 30% of which are new; 13% alcohol). Immediately enticing aromatically, with a natural sweetness to the plump, ripe, red berry fruits. There’s a brightness and a lift and energy to this that seems to convey the health of the vineyard. Focussed, precise and very pure with an almost glassy, crystalline texture. Some will crave more flesh and viscosity, but I rather like this refined, elegant yet vivid and fruit-forward style. 90-92+
Château La Cabanne
Château La Cabanne (Pomerol; 94% Merlot; 6% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 26 hl/ha after densimetric sorting; 13% alcohol; on lovely pure argile; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then with François Estager at the property early on a wet Saturday morning). Floral. Fresh blooms picked this morning. Black cherries. Blueberries. But also bright crunchy red berry fruits. A little scratched leather too. Quite distinctive, with the signature crasse de fer minerality that tells us where we are. A little spice from the small proportion of new oak. The density and concentration is impressive. Indeed, this almost feels – rarely for the vintage – a little ‘blocky’ and foursquare. But the tannins remain soft and finely grained. There’s impressive weight and gravitas for the vintage if never the elegance of some of its more august neighbours (we’re just across the street from Trotanoy). A pleasing grape skin note on the finish. 91-93
Château La Connivence
Château La Connivence (Pomerol; a garden vineyard of just 1.4 hectares next to Belle Brise on a small gravel slope; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 37 hl/ha; 13.4% alcohol; tasted at La Gaffelière with Alexandre de Malet Rocquefort). Succulent, plump and plush with a gorgeously soft and aromatic black cherry and blueberry fruit. I love the radiant violet and rose petal note. Saline in its minerality too, even aromatically. Naturally sweet, plump on the palate, this pushes the cheeks but is also generously filled to its centre with fresh, vibrant and quite dense and compact berry and stone fruits. Intensely sapid and juicy on the grape skin finish. Succulent and almost opulent, which is rare in the vintage. Authentic and accessible. 92-94+
Château La Conseillante
Château La Conseillante (Pomerol; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of just 22 hl/ha due to the losses arising from coulure and millerandage associated with the slow and long floraison after an early débourrement and difficult pollination requiring for the first time densimetic sorting calibrated at 12.5% alcohol, with 20% of what was harvested rejected; there was no significant problem with mildew; pH 3.57; 9% vin de presse; aged in oak barrels, 70% new; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at La Conseillante with Marielle Cazaux). Fabulous aromatics. Violet and the parfumier’s essence of violet. Incense too. Rose petals and, again, their parfumier’s essence. Black cherry and confit blueberries. A little hint of the cedar to come and a trace of graphite (if graphite comes in traces). Super-svelte on the attack, with ultra-fine grained and gracious tannins, the first inhalation of air bringing the violets back into the core of the dark berry and stone fruits. Compact and nicely concentrated. Supple and limpid over quite an ample frame. Very classical but also even more intensely floral than ever. The tannins stay just – but only just – the right side of dry which is my only slight qualm. Serene. This has been expertly managed and is very beautiful whilst remaining entirely true to the style of both the vintage and La Conseillante. Excellent. 94-96
Château La Croix
Château La Croix (Pomerol; 60% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon; from Joseph Janoueix’s vineyard of 10 hectares in Catusseau between Beauregard and Nénin in the heart of the appellation on a gravel terroir). Very classical in a way, and a success in the context of the vintage. A lovely quite expressive nose of wildflowers, wild herbs and dark berry fruits, blackcurrant and bramble. This feels pleasingly ripe, and the mid-palate actually builds as the wine inhales. The finish is clean, precise, quite aerial and with no dryness. Simple but very well made and very expressive of its terroir and appellation. 90-92
Château La Croix du Casse
Château La Croix du Casse (Pomerol; 95% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; 14% alcohol; tasted at Batailley with Frédéric Castéja). Iron-rich in its crasse de fer minerality. Quite sweet-fruited, with dark plums and assorted red berries. I find this very direct, honest and authentic. There’s a lovely freshness too, that vivifies the mid-palate just when one is looking for a little further interest. Just a slight hint of residual sugar. 89-91
Château La Croix Saint-Georges
Château La Croix Saint-Georges (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; from Jean-Philippe Jonoueix; tasted just the once at a négociant tasting). There’s a certain new temperance here! A lovely intense damson, Griotte cherry and blueberry fruit, very pure, fine and precise – indeed, in almost pixilated detail. I prefer this to the 2023. It’s very direct, authentic and expressive, finely layered too. I like the eloquent crystallinity of the fruit as it flows over the plate very much. The only slight downside is the hint of dryness on the finish. But there is no mistaking the elegance of this, the oak much more moderated than it used to be. 91-93+
Château La Croix Toulifaut
Château La Croix Toulifaut (Pomerol; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; a tiny property of 1.9 hectares contiguous with the much larger La Croix estate; from Joseph Janoueix; now certified organic). I have very fond memories of the 1998 (reinforced by the image of the wonderful etching on the label) and I rather like this too. It’s richer and deeper than La Croix, with less dark berry fruits and more plummy notes – damsons and a little crushed blueberry. It’s more creamy in texture and it has a pleasing viscosity, suggesting ripe fruit and little or no chaptalisation. Long and gently tapering on the finish, there’s lot to like here even if it’s far from the most complex of wines. 90-92+
Château La Fleur de Gay
Château La Fleur de Gay (Pomerol; 88.5% Merlot; 11.5% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; tasted just once at the offices of a Bordeaux négociant). Violets. Blueberries. Griotte cherries. A little sweet spice from the oak and a little iron minerality – the crasse de fer perhaps a little more demonstrative than it usually is. Precise, focused and quite limpid. There’s not quite the sparkle and vivacity in the mid-palate of 2020 or 2022 but I like the choices made here. 91-93
Château La Fleur-Pétrus
Château La Fleur-Pétrus (Pomerol; 99.5% Merlot; 0.5% Petit Verdot; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). There is no Hosanna this year, nor Lagrange à Pomerol nor La Grave. But this is beguiling and beautiful with a very pure lilac and violet floral aromatic profile enrobing the dark berry and damson fruit. Cedar and a little graphite with aeration. Plump, plush, succulent and very gracious in its limpid, sinuous evolution over the palate. Cool and crystalline. Sapid and saline on the finish. Truly gorgeous and capturing the subtle beauty and elegance of plateau Pomerol at its best. 94-96
Château La Patache
Château La Patache (Pomerol; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 21 hl/ha; pH 3.6; 13% alcohol; tasted at Bellefont-Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Quite an interesting and distinct minerality – a little crasse de fer and quite saline too. Pure, precise, fruit-forward, easy in a way but the clarity and fine-grained character of the tannins are very evident and they give this a certain swagger and sense of class. 88-90
Château La Violette
Château La Violette (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 16 hl/ha which, from the 1.26 hectares in production, produces very little, fewer than 3000 bottles; hand de-stemmed and micro-vinified in new oak barrels; 13.5% alcohol; tasted with Henri Parent at Le Gay). Always the product of a labour of love here in a vintage in which all the best wines have been made in that way. This is a vintage in which this wine really expresses its identity. Lifted violet and peony notes, a little lily of the valley too, a touch of very dark chocolate interspersed with the violets. There is also a note of dried rose petals. Damson and bramble. The oak is already well-integrated but brings a definitive touch of spice to this. Very gracious tannins and a lovely sapidity, over a much narrower frame than Le Gay. Altogether more subtle and shimmering in its silky mouthfeel. Very good indeed, above all for a wine that is 100 per cent Merlot in a vintage where this is often very tricky. This shows its class. The élévage will need to be carefully managed, but this has considerable potential and will reward the patient. 93-95
Château Lafleur
Château Lafleur (Pomerol; 45M; 55B; high yields of around 40-42 hl/ha; 13.4% alcohol naturally; tasted at the property with Baptiste and Julie Guinaudeau, Omri Ram and Ralitsa Todorieva). The task here according to Baptiste Guinaudeau and Omri Ram was to provide a buffer between the weather conditions and the vines, absorbing the meteorological shocks of the growing season to produce as normal a vineyard cycle as possible to aid ripening. It’s the vineyard equivalent of Keynesianism – counter-cyclical vineyard management! Accepting the early start and, in this case also, longer growing season was also crucial (with February, in effect, now viewed as the first month of Spring). The story here is one of rapid adaptation to unprecedented circumstances – such as the earliest mildew pressure ever and root asphyxiation in the second half of April, necessitating the opening of the soil to encourage the vines to resume growth in preparation for what would otherwise have been a very difficult floraison. The results are spectacular. This is vintage transcendent and utterly gorgeous aromatically. Opulent in its florality, this is a wine of staggering depth and concentration. Red and black cherry, cassis and blackcurrant, bramble, blueberry. Blood orange. That generous and radiant florality – both petals (rose, violet and mimosa) and bulb (iris and peony). Sublime aromatically, ever more so with aeration, this is a wine that grows and grows – and then grows some more – in the glass. So generously sweet and complex in its fruit profile. More and more cherry notes come through building a very natural tension with the fresher darker berry fruits that establish themselves first. A wine with incredible concentration and impact on the palate and a glorious succulence and a natural sweetness too. For Lafleur at this stage I find it wondrously vivid, especially when the tannins engage, breaking the surface of the compact spherical core and releasing little fountains and springs of freshness. On the finish the vibrant sapidity and inherent juiciness form itself into waves, lapping on the shore, seemingly for ever … 96-98+
Château Lafleur-Gazin
Château Lafleur-Gazin (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). The point (each year there is one) in the Moueix line-up where we step up a notch in our climb towards the summit. A lovely combination of violet florality and creamy fresh plump blueberries, with a little hint of cedar. Very little of the briny ferrous minerality than can destabilise this wine in its youth. Glossy, polished, with quite a slender frame, this is a rather succulent and very juicy and enticing Pomerol that I really like in this vintage. 90-92+
Château Latour à Pomerol
Château Latour à Pomerol (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). Expressive and quite lifted aromatically, with a gracious red and darker berry fruit and a little damson. Cedar and a delicate waft of violet remind us of where we are and the violets build and build with gentle aeration – and as they do so they are accompanied, more and more, by a similarly gentle rose petal note. All rather beautiful. Gracious and soft on the attack with quite an ample frame, this is excellent. It lacks the precision and detail in the mid-palate of the very best vintages here, but the mouthfeel is luxuriantly succulent and there’s a pleasing juiciness on the finish. 91-93+
Château Le Bon Pasteur
Château Le Bon Pasteur (Pomerol; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; micro-vinified in new oak barrels; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; Michel Rolland and Julien Viaud are the consultants here; tasted twice, the first at the UGC press tasting). True to its style, this is immediately oaky and takes a while to settle in the glass. It’s nutty too and with a pleasing note of desiccated roses and pot pourri. There’s almost a hint of truffle too alongside the ripe fresh and baked plums and this is a wine that will definitely evolve in that way. Indeed, what’s fascinating about this is that the aromatics and the attack seem to come from a wine that is much older, with almost the sensation of secondary notes emerging. The mid-palate composition and finish are, however, very much those of an en primeur sample. It’ll be fascinating to see how this turns out from bottle. A wine whose ‘heart and soul’ is in Pomerol. 90-92+
Château Le Gay
Château Le Gay (Pomerol; 81% Merlot; 19% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 18.4 hl/ha from the 10.4 hectares in production; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then with Henri Parent at the property). Plump, plush, densely charged and packed with cherry and dark berry fruits, with the Cabernet Franc more present when re-tasted at the property. A little lilac too. Dried flowers and pot pourri. Leather and tabac. Frangipane and toasted almonds. This is big, bold and distinctive in the context of the vintage. The careful management of the extraction has allowed much more volume in the mouth and viscosity than in almost all wines of the appellation in the vintage, but without any astringency or dryness which is impressive indeed. Chunky, which is not a descriptor I’ve yet used in this vintage! But it is also sapid and refreshing on the finish, with a menthol life right at the end. 92-94
Château Maillet
Château Maillet (Pomerol). A bit of a bell-weather wine for me and I like its plump black cherry, blueberry and blueberry fruit profile very much. I like too the hint of peony and the cedar that comes through with more aeration. There’s quite a lot of substance to this which means that the fruit density covers the oak well – it can be a little less subtle here. A shade towards the dry side on the finish but this has, overall, been very well managed and will make for one of the more hedonistic wines of the vintage. 90-92+
Château Monregard La Croix
Château Monregard La Croix (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 36 hl/ha; 30% new oak; 12.8% alcohol with no chaptalisation; tasted twice, first with Jean-Baptiste Bourotte at Clos du Clocher). Blue and purple fruits. Energetic, broad framed and juicy. Layered. Soft and sweet-fruited, fresh and delicious. A lifted plume on the finish with a lovely touch of liquorice. Simple but very well achieved technically and with a pleasing ripeness to it. 90-92
Château Montviel
Château Montviel (Pomerol; 92% Merlot; 8% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 20 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol). There’s a pleasing violet and lilac florality to this. Blueberries and brambles, plump and nicely ripe. Quite limpid and crystalline, this is very much a success in the context of the vintage even if the acidity gathers towards the finish. But then the grip and bite of the tannins releases a wave of juicy freshness that clears that away and gives this an impressive length. 90-92
Château Nénin
Château Nénin (Pomerol; 54% Merlot; 38% Cabernet Franc; 8% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 5.3% vin de presse; IPT 60; pH 3.64; 13% alcohol; tasted at the property). Fine. Light, lifted and aerial with a pure black berry and bramble fruit. A sprig or two of wild herbs and even a little note of underbrush, rare in the vintage. This is precise, quite linear but lacks a little interest in the mid-palate. It’s texturally very refined, however, with such soft and fine-grained tannins. Never dilute, but one craves just a little more substance. Slowly tapering on the finish. 89-91
Château Petit-Village
Château Petit-Village (Pomerol; 60% Merlot; 31% Cabernet Franc; 9% Cabernet Sauvignon; from around 4 of the 10.5 hectares, much of which has recently been replanted; a final yield of 20 hl/ha, very similar to La Conseillante and L’Evangile; the average age of the vines is now 57 years; floraison was early and hence difficult and the result was coulure and millerandage; very little mildew loss; the size of the harvesting team was doubled allowing things to be picked when they needed to be, very quickly; pH 3.65; 13% alcohol; certified organic; tasted at the property with Lauren Laudrin and Vincent Priou). This is very beautiful with the low yields achieving a kind of quality selection that raises this to a still higher level in the context of the vintage. Violets and roses, so utterly beautiful, in their pixilated perfection. It’s appropriate in a triangular shaped vineyard to say that this is very close to the top of the qualitative pyramid that forms this vintage. The Cabernet Franc expresses itself so graciously. Very lifted. There’s no need to swirl this, such is the aromatic lift. Blueberry and blueberry compote with a touch of cassis and black cherry. So fine. Cool, soft, ultra-fine grained and utterly beautiful texturally. One sees the potential of the terroir here more than ever and the work that has already been achieved. The cedar in the mid-palate is beautiful too. This is all that I look for in a top plateau Pomerol in its perfectly limpid and crystalline purity and precision. Long and sapid on the finish. 94-96
Château Plince
Château Plince (Pomerol; 86% Merlot; 14% Cabernet Franc; from a vineyard of 8.7 hectares on a sand over crasse de fer terroir; tasted twice, the second time at JP Moueix in Libourne). Quite glossy in texture and with very fine-grained polished tannins enrobing a reasonably well-packed spherical core. This is nicely done but its lacks delineation and flow over the palate, coming across as a little monotonic, stern even, as a consequence. But it’s fresh, soft and quite sapid. Well made, but one has the sense that nature was not especially kind here. 88-90
Château Plincette
Château Plincette (Pomerol; 100M; from a little property of 1.41ha in the south of the appellation next to the rugby stadium on the outskirts of Libourne). Nicely achieved, with quite a bit of character. Damson and blueberries. Fresh-fruited and lithe, crystalline and pure, fluid and quite ample. Chewy tannins release freshness and sapidity on the finish. No dryness. Long. 87-89
Château Porte Chic
Château Porte Chic (Pomerol; 70% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; 5% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 32.2 hl/ha; pH 3.40; 13% alcohol; this comes from a tiny vineyard of around 2 hectares on what used to be the horse racing track very close to the village of Pomerol itself; it was acquired in 2010 and is produced by Jean-Louis Trocard – better known for Clos Dubreuil and Clos de la Vieille Eglise; appropriately enough, it’s named after a race horse – Papillon Porte Chic!). One of Pomerol’s hidden gems. Tasted after its sister wine, Clos de la Vieille Eglise, this is much more red-berry fruited – red cherries, redcurrants and just a little blackcurrant, perhaps a hint of blueberry leaf too. This is fresher still (the pH lower), a little more lifted and it has less density and layering, partly due to its slightly more ample frame. I love the vibrancy of the mid-palate and the crystalline purity that I find there too – and also the darker fruit shades on the finish, more blackcurrant and grape skin. 90-92+
Château Rouget
Château Rouget (Pomerol; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; 30% barrel fermentation, the rest in stainless steel tanks; pH 3.6; 13% alcohol; certified organic; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Pretty, pleasingly floral and almost Burgundian in its poise, its amplitude and its relaxed, calm and gentle swagger. It’s a little Gevrey-Chambertin-like stylistically, with a natural sweetness quite a sinuous mid-palate. Long and gently tapering this might lack the density, layering and complexity of the very best vintages from here, but it’s a success in the context of this one. 91-93
Château Séraphine
Château Séraphine (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; 4000 bottles, less than half of the total production here). Smoky, toasty and quite intriguing aromatically with dark berry fruits, cassis and a generous sweet spicing – cinnamon, a touch of nutmeg – all bringing attention and interest. A hint of black tea too. With more aeration there’s a little violet florality and a trace of the cedar that will come through with age. A strict selection preserves the class and integrity of this wine which has a lovely glistening mouthfeel. Tense and increasingly fresh on the lingering finish if a little insubstantial in comparison to recent vintages. 91-93+
Château Tour Maillet
Château Tour Maillet (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; 13.5% alcohol). The oak signature is quite pronounced and this will need more time for everything to come together, but it does help to underline the subtle floral elements. I like too the nutty, walnut shell and walnut oil note that comes through with aeration and supports the strawberry, raspberry and plum fruit. True to its hedonistic Pomerol style in a vintage that makes that more difficult I suspect. 87-89
Château Trotanoy
Château Trotanoy (Pomerol; 99.5% Merlot; 0.5% Cabernet Franc; tasted at JP Moueix in Libourne). Very elegant. Intensely dark to the core with lots of graphite generously enrobing the black cherry and crushed raspberry and blueberry fruit. There’s a little lilac florality, but it’s more subtle and disguised than in La Fleur-Pétrus and overall, this is a little less expressive for now. It’s deeper and richer in a way on the palate, with more gravitas and profundity, more concentration and density but perhaps at this stage a little less clarity and delineation. This will need time, rather like Certan de May. It’s a little difficult to read at this stage, but it’s definitely very impressive – and as it starts to open in the glass it does start to express more that lush, plump cedar and violet element that makes one’s heart beat faster for Trotanoy. Disguised power, subtle elegance and considerable promise. 95-97
Château Vray Croix de Gay
Château Vray Croix de Gay (Pomerol; 79% Merlot; 21% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 31 hl/ha; 13.1 alcohol; tasted at Calon-Ségur). Floral, with a vivid violet character. Cedar. Dark berries. This is all rather beautiful. The oak is more moderate than it used to be and I find this more and more plummy as it opens. Supple. This has quite a narrow frame and maybe lacks a bit of density but it’s impressively pure and crystalline. 91-93
Clos Beauregard
Clos Beauregard (Pomerol; from 6 hectares below Beauregard; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; pH 3.7; IPT 65; 13% alcohol). Crunchy fresh red berry fruits – strawberries and a little loganberry, just à point – and that Pomerol ferrous minerality. On the palate, the frame is quite narrow and that helps give this a little gravitas. The fruit seems to darken over the palate which I rather like, bringing additional interest just when it might otherwise seem a little one-dimensional. Nicely judged, if quite light, insubstantial and lacking in complexity. 87-89
Clos Bel Air
Clos Bel Air (Pomerol; 95% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; from 2.5 hectares next to Bonalgue on the outskirts of Libourne; 100% vinification integrale in oak barrels of 300 litres; 12.5% alcohol). The crasse de fer minerality is immediately evident aromatically. Lush plum and damson fruits, a little blueberry too. On the palate, this is quite linear but generously enrobed with plump and plush berry fruits. A hint of walnut. Considerable tannins but they are never dry and fully ripe, the gentleness of the extraction (using Rpulse) very clear. This has decent aging potential. 89-91
Clos de la Vieille Eglise
Clos de la Vieille Eglise (Pomerol; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; from a tiny property of 1.5 hectares on a gravel-clay terroir in the very heart of the appellation; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; pH 3.50; 13% alcohol). A lovely quite expressive aromatic profile of damsons and dark berry fruits – blueberries (from the Cabernet Franc) and mulberries and a little black berry and bramble. There’s a hint of wild thyme and rosemary too and a delicate pink/purple florality – wisteria perhaps, but it’s subtle and difficult to pin down to a simple descriptor. This is lovely too on the attack with the gracious cedar elements (not especially evident aromatically), the blueberries and, now, the violet florality combining beautifully. Quite a narrow frame, good depth and layering. A tad dry on the finish, but lush in the mid-palate, this is wine I rather like in 2024. 91-93
Clos du Clocher
Clos du Clocher (Pomerol; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; pH 3.52; 13.2% alcohol; the first year certified organic and the 100th anniversary since the purchase in 1924; tasted with Jean-Baptiste Bourotte at the property). Aromatically gorgeous with blue fruits, cedar and graphite and a little black and red cherry, a touch of red liquorice too. With aeration there’s a little damson and damson skin, grape skins too. Really lush, plush and plump. Mouth-filling and cheek-pushing! The considerable amplitude gives the fruits and freshness space to ripple and dance, little tourbillons (swirls) of freshness bubbling and rippling up from below. This has great density and concentration in the mid-palate; but it’s lifted and energetic too. Liquorice – now black – on the saline finish and a well-shaped aerial plume. Succulent, lithe and limpid, the quality of the tannins is exceptional. There’s a hint of menthol on the finish too. 92-94+
Domaine de L’Eglise
Domaine de L’Eglise (Pomerol; 98% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; 14% alcohol; tasted at Batailley with Frédéric Castéja). Dark plummy fruits – damsons, a little black cherry and some blueberry and mulberry too. Walnut oil and a lovely hint of violet and a touch of cedar. Chewy on the finish. Nicely done but perhaps missing a little density in the mid-palate. 90-92
Enclos Tourmaline
Enclos Tourmaline (Pomerol; just 1.2 hectares on blue clay and gravel close to Le Pin; 96% Merlot; 4% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; pH 3.45; 100% vinification intégrale in new oak; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at Bellefont-Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Interesting. Quite nutty at first, with even a hint of salted peanut brittle! Red cherries, blueberries and mulberries. Ultra-pure with a lovely mouthfeel. Very soft but at the same time tactile, with transparent layering achieving a kind of glossy glassy-ness. Brilliant in its freshness and éclat. Elegant, enticing, energetic and very impressive. Classy, sleek and super-stylish. 93-95
Fugue de Nénin
Fugue de Nénin (Pomerol; 97% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 9.2% vin de presse; IPT 51; pH 3.60; 13% alcohol; tasted at Nénin). Bright, intensely dark berry fruit. Simple but very nicely done. Quite plump and lush on the attack, but then the acidity kicks in a little and it comes as a slight shock, but thereafter the wine recovers its form. The tannins are incredibly soft, and this is excellent at its level when set in the context of the vintage. 87-89
L’Innocence de Séraphine
L’Innocence de Séraphine (Pomerol; 65% Merlot; 35% Cabernet Franc; 13.3% alcohol; just 4500 bottles and a little over half of the total production of this 2.2 hectare estate). Sweet-fruited aromatically, with a subtle hint of vanilla pod and sweet spices dusting the dark berries and the red and darker stone fruits. A hint of cedar, but really just a suggestion. This is fine, but it lacks both the complexity and the mid-palate delineation of the grand vin. When you taste the two together you understand (and respect) the choices made. 87-89
La Clémence
La Clémence (Pomerol). Plump red berry fruits, red cherries too and a little splash of kirsch– not a note I find often in this vintage. This is impressively hedonistic for the vintage and nicely held in balance, even if it seems like a bit of a dangerous juggling act to perform in a vintage like this. There’s a slightly confected floral note and one feels the oak is doing quite a lot of the work in bringing sweetness to this, but it kind of works. 88-90
La Petite Église
La Petite Église (Pomerol; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; aging in oak barrels, 70% new; 13.5% alcohol; tasted with Noëmie Durantou at L’Eglise Clinet). Seductive, succulent and so redolently of the plateau. This is rich for the vintage with a lovely sense of compactness and density that is so often missing in 2024. That gracious delicate and subtle violet and rose petal florality that one is no used to finding here. Incense, just a touch. And cedar with aeration. A little red berry fruit too – raspberry, especially, and it’s as it each separate berry is captured in pixilated detail. Cool and focussed at the core – like gliding into a moonlit glassy lake but only slightly disturbing the surface. Glassy, glossy, but natural in its purity and precision and crystallinity – the signature of Noemie Durantou’s wines this year – but with a density that is very rare in the vintage. The freshness is very well integrated and distributed over the palate and that gives this a vivacity and energy that is energising and that brings a very tactile sense of engagement with the wine. 92-94
Le Pin
Le Pin (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 29 hl/ha; pH 3.72; 65% new oak; 13% alcohol tasted with Jacques Thienpont from two different samples). Radiantly gorgeous in its aromatics. Very lifted, aerial and vertical – more so than usual – but with the same sense of class and erudition. Eloquent, articulate, poised and gracious. Pencil-shavings and blueberry, red and darker cherries, sloes and damsons. But also, that intense bulby florality than is a signature of the vintage, here with perhaps greater intensity than anywhere else. I find more blueberry notes from a second, fresher, sample, also a little rose petal and wisteria. Heather too. This is so incredibly soft and gently enrobing in the mouth. A wine without an attack – for that’s far too harsh a word. Upright in form in the mouth like an extended lozenge, with the tactile tannins extending the vertical range in a most beautifully soft and gentle way. I utterly adore this. Succulent in its way, but more immediately ethereal than any recent vintage of Le Pin. A coup de Coeur, to which I react with goosepimples. A little hint of bitterness on the finish – with almost a slight delectable burnt sugar note. 96-98+
Les Pensées de Lafleur
Les Pensées de Lafleur (Pomerol; 64% Merlot; 36% Bouchet; high yields of around 40-42 hl/ha; 13.4% alcohol; tasted at the property with Baptiste and Julie Guinaudeau, Omri Ram and Ralitsa Todorieva). Blueberry. Cassis. Bramble. And that intense florality – here more peony, iris and mimosa than violet, again quite all quite bulby (almost with a little earth still attached to the bulbs). Grippy and structured, the considerable tannins mould and shape this over the palate. Very much a vin de garde in a vintage typically for more immediate gratification. Cashmere textured, yet serious and structured. Almost blocky in its tannic structure. If this were a work of art (and it is, in a way) it would have been painted by Braque! Vivid and brilliant and utterly distinctive. Very aerial on the finish, but also ethereal and very, very long. 94-96
Petrus
Petrus (Pomerol; 100% Merlot; tasted with Olivier Berrouet). Plump dark berry fruits. A little black cherry. A lot of Petrus graphite. Very soft, very round, very sumptuous and almost opulent but with a hint of the slight austerity of the vintage giving this a depth and profundity that really sets it apart. With aeration, the cedar starts to flood through and fill this out further. Walnuts. Walnut oil. And fresh mint. A hint of violet now and even rose petal. A touch of ferrous minerality. Very delicate fine tannins – from the quite thin skins. Ample, naturally sweet, very spherical in form and pushing into the cheeks. I love the classicism and calm tranquillity of this. The tannins are beady and break in through the glassy spherical core to release plumes of additional freshness – but not with the crisp brightness and freshness of Lafleur as this has more of a tranquil and calm authority and stature. Majestic. Magisterial. This has a harmony that is overpowering. So gracious, so complete already and just how you might wish to imagine it to be. Spherical at the core (almost matching the form of the glass in which it is served), with the tannins breaking up the surface just a little, releasing little eddies – tourbillons – of freshness that animate this. They release too a little salinity. One of the most enjoyable wines of the vintage to taste. Utterly beautiful and beguiling and with a grace and charm that is incredible. Not big, but great. Serene. 96-98
Vieux Château Château
Vieux Château Château (Pomerol; 71% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 9% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted with Guillaume and Alexandre Thienpont at the property). Magnifique! Aromatically vertical, like Le Pin but fresher in a way and more direct. Cassis. Blackcurrant, bramble. Graphite and a hint of the cedar to come, more and more as this opens up and inhales. A little fresher in its fruit signature, with redcurrant and a redcurrant leafiness. Mimosa and rose petal. Lovely is form with a narrower frame than in recent vintages, accentuating the sense of crystallinity. This is like a vertically presented cylinder, glassy and crystalline to the middle with up-thrusts of fresh dark berry fruits revivifying the palate. With aeration in the mouth the cedar and cassis interweave like a vine spiralling upwards as it attaches itself to a vertical stake – gorgeously inter-coiled. A great sense of vertical range and hence depth. Yet this feels light and aerial. I love the reappearance of the bulby floral notes on the finish. Long and intensely vinous. More linear than it has been in recent vintages. Serine. 94-96+

Pessac-Léognan

C de Carmes Haut-Brion
C de Carmes Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 62% Cabernet Sauvignon; 37% Merlot; 1% Petit Verdot; pH 3.55; aged in 25% new oak, 50% in vats of 30 hl and 11% in amphorae; whole bunch fermentation at 29%; 12.9% alcohol, with 0.6% of chaptalisation; tasted with Guillaume Pouthier at Les Carmes Haut-Brion). Very nutty, with a sense almost of peanut. Espresso coffee bean. The absence of coulure and millerandage allowed more whole bunch fermentation here in Martillac. Intense plum and dark berry fruits, really crunchy and fresh, radiantly sapid and juicy. The cassis is very noticeable. The amplitude on the attack increases the space that the rippling eddies of fresh fruit seek to fill. Blueberries too and brambles. Very pure, focussed and precise, with impressive density and intensity (reinforced by the whole-cluster fermentation). Very fine tannins that pinch and structure the wine, producing a gloriously lifted fantail finish. Really rises above the challenges of the vintage, with great harmony, balance and energy. 92-94
Château Bouscaut
Château Bouscaut (Pessac-Léognan; 58% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Sauvignon; 12% Malbec; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first with Sophie Lurton & Laurent Cogombles and then at the UGCB Press tasting at the Cité du Vin). A mix of red and darker berry fruits, with a little red cherry and plum, maybe a subtle hint of redcurrant too. There’s a natural sweetness to this on the attack that you don’t quite anticipate from the rather taciturn aromatics. Quite a narrow frame giving this more of a sense of impact. Quite linear too, but never strict. A hint of hazelnut and, with it, a certain creaminess. A touch of its signature iron minerality too. The tannins are fine-grained and this is well managed even if it doesn’t quite set my pulse racing. 90-92
Château Bouscaut
Château Bouscaut (Pessac-Léognan; 80% Sauvignon Blanc; 20% Sémillon; a final yield of 39 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; Thomas Duclos is the consultant here and this feels like one of his ‘project’ wines; tasted twice, the first time with Sophie Lurton & Laurent Cogombles and then at the UGCB Press tasting). Greengage, gooseberry and cut grass, green tea, lime and lime zest and lily of the valley. Wondrously intense on the attack, with lots of depth and substance over quite a narrow frame accentuating the impact and yet still giving the biting fresh fruit space in which to circle and undulate and ripple and dance. This is very dynamic and energetic in the mid-palate and represents quite a change in style (certainly when taken together with the 2023). Crystalline in its purity, this is perhaps for me the best recent vintage of Bouscaut. 92-94
Château Cantelys
Château Cantelys (Pessac-Léognan; from Daniel & Florence Cathiard). As with the white, the stylistic similarities with Smith are evident. Rich, bold and quite ample on the attack with a plush and plump, pulpy berry fruit, some wild sage and Italian herbs, a hint of coconut and a subtle touch of oak (but not too much). There’s an inkiness to this in the mid-palate that is rare and the freshness never threatens to become tart or astringent. Well-balanced if just a tad dry on the finish. 87-89
Château Cantelys blanc
Château Cantelys blanc (Pessac-Léognan; from Daniel & Florence Cathiard). One can see the family resemblance with Smith Haut-Lafitte here immediately. This is rich and quite creamy, with lots of peachy fleshy substance and generous citrus acidity to prevent things from getting out of hand. A nice balance, if a bit of a fine wire balancing act – this is close to being too rich for my taste even in quite a fresh and crisp vintage like this. Linden and candlewax linger long on the finale. 88-90
Château Carbonnieux
Château Carbonnieux (Pessac-Léognan; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; 5% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Red and darker cherry and cherry stone notes, a little damson and bramble but really only after quite a bit of energetic swirling. A touch of cedar and graphite. This is one of the successes of the appellation and there is a sense here that the red as well as the white have been on a steep upward ascent, evident here. Soft tannins, quite a creamy mid-palate if nothing of the weight and density – nor complexity – of the 2020 or 2022. If I’m being picky, I’d like a little more shape in the mid-palate. 89-91
Château Carbonnieux blanc
Château Carbonnieux blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 67% Sauvignon Blanc; 33% Sémillon; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 12/5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Saline, with distinct notes of iodine and oyster shell too; almost a hint of smoky bacon crisps (an odd one I know!). White currant, gooseberry, greengage and maybe a little Mirabelle – but it’s fresher than that implies. There’s a little white pear too. Linden and lime. I like the lithe and sinuous mouthfeel accentuated by the sense of viscosity and I like too the trace of limestone tannin that helps shape the finish. This has me craving oysters, just as it should, though it’s perhaps not the most complex of vintages of this wine. 90-92+
Château Carmes Haut-Brion
Château Carmes Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 48% Cabernet Franc (Bouchet) – 10% more than usual; 29% Cabernet Sauvignon; 23% Merlot; pH 3.61; aged in 70% new oak, 19% in vats of 30 hl and 25% in amphorae; whole bunch fermentation at 52%; a final yield of 24 hl/ha; 13.2% alcohol with no chaptalisation, picked at 13.9% and reduced with the whole bunch; tasted with Guillaume Pouthier at the property). I find this more like Cheval Blanc than ever before! The lowest ever proportion of Merlot in the final blend. A very long floraison of 3-4 weeks, with the biggest problem being the variation in the ripeness of the grapes within the bunches arising from coulure and millerandage. Densimetric sorting was crucial, with almost 40% of the harvested crop rejected (everything below 11.5% of potential alcohol). In the process a potential yield in the vineyard of 45 hl/ha was reduced at picking to 41 hl/ha, with just 24 hl/ha selected for vinification. The average age of vines is now 65 years. The density in the mid-palate is reinforced by the whole bunch fermentation. Instantly nutty. Walnuts and walnut oil. Iris. Peony. Peony bulb. Marjoram. Crushed and yet-to-be-crushed blueberries, a little black cherry too and that lovely authentic Cabernet Franc leafiness. That renders this very aerial but there is no mistaking the great gravitas and profundity too. This has a great vertical range which Guillaume Pouthier compares to a diamond shape in the mouth – though I find it less angular than that implies. Cedar and graphite, with more and more of the former with aeration. Saline, with even a touch of iodine. Succulent, intensely juicy and with a rare viscosity and density – this actually pushes the cheeks. The viscosity of the sapid finish produces almost the sensation of the transposing of the ‘tears’ in the glass to inside of one’s cheeks. Beautifully shaped and structured, lush and plush, plump and generous. Vintage transcendent and clearly the wine of the vintage in the appellation. 96-98
Château Couhins
Château Couhins (Pessac-Léognan; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; from 23 hectares on gravel-rich hilltop over a clay subsoil; a final yield of 37 ha/hl; 12.5% alcohol; certified organic; tasted twice). Aromatically this is very Pessac – in fact, Léognan – with a waft of smoke alongside that delightful wild herbal notes, a hint of charcuterie and quite a rich, dark stone and berry fruit. The minerality is evident too. Fine and quite soft and succulent for the vintage with a more gracious flow over the palate than many of its ostensible peers, the acidity well integrated. Bright and crunchy but never severe. Nice grippy tannins release a wave of sapidity on the finish. 91-93+.
Château Couhins blanc
Château Couhins blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 96% Sauvignon Blanc; 4% Sauvignon Gris; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 12.8% alcohol; certified organic tasted twice with consistent notes). Wonderfully chiselled, intensely vertical and sublimely tense and fresh, lively and energetic this is the epitome of what makes this a great vintage for the dry whites on these kinds of terroirs and in the hands of great technicians. This is glorious already with those lovely zesty notes, orange blossom too and a hint of green tea and yuzu, almost even a touch of grated ginger, but it will age effortlessly too. Radiantly sapid and grippy on the finish in a way that wonderfully refreshes the palate. Excellent. 93-95
Château Couhins Lurton
Château Couhins Lurton (Pessac-Léognan; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13.5% alcohol; a final yield of 47 ha/ha; Eric Boissenot is the consultant; tasted twice, the first time at La Louvière). Creamy but tense. Very Merlot and very pure in its fruit profile – cassis and redcurrant with the tension that the latter implies; red cherries too. More cassis comes through in the mouth. Lovely purity. Fresh and tense. A very present backbone. Very fresh on the finish but that together with the tannic grip underscore the purity of the fruit. Grape skins right at the end. Impressive and almost a little Margellais in that it’s very floral for Pessac, with delicate spring flowers. Never strict, unlike many, this has been well-achieved. 92-94
Château Couhins Lurton blanc 2024
Château Couhins Lurton blanc 2024 (Pessac-Léognan; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 41 ha/ha; 13% alcohol; Valérie Lavigne is the consultant here as for La Louvière; tasted twice, first at the property). More wild in its aromatics than, say, La Louvière. Almost a touch of tomato stalk and redcurrant and white currant leaf. Lemon meringue pie. Citron pressé. White grapefruit. Delicate white spring flowers. Jasmine too and a little elderberry. Green tea leaf, almost a hint of toasted rice. There’s salinity even on the nose. So intense and compact and structurally tense. Really juicy and fresh and sapid. This is the style of Pessac that I really love, with no demonstrative hint of the oak. Great aging potential. A vintage that really shows off the style of this terroir – so racy and fresh and bright and vividly energetic. The limestone bedrock here really sings! 93-95
Château de Fieuzal
Château de Fieuzal (Pessac-Léognan; 45% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Sauvignon; 15% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 29 ha/ha; 12.95% alcohol; Thomas Duclos has been the consultant here for the last 5 years; tasted twice, first with Stephen Carrier at the property). The character of the vintage is very much more obvious on the palate than aromatically – with the nose rather more sunny and solaire, a pleasing contrast to many. Hyper-expressive and with that lovely very pure, precise, freshly crushed ripe red berry fruit – raspberry and loganberry. Sandalwood, a de Fieuzal signature. Blood orange, above all with aeration. Fennel seed. A little hint of redcurrant and a little blueberry too. Very lithe and ethereal. Aerial on the palate. Glassy. Crystalline. There’s a touch of graphite and even cedar – rare in the vintage – with aeration. This is very refined and quite Burgundian in a way. Elegant and pure. It maybe lacks a little of the complexity of the 2 previous vintages, but it fills out as the wine inhales and this was tasted first only a week after the assemblage. Very mineral and quite saline on the finish. 92-94
Château de Fieuzal blanc
Château de Fieuzal blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 70% Sauvignon Blanc; 30% Sémillon; a final yield of 40 ha/ha; alcohol; tasted twice, first with Stephen Carrier at the property a week after the final assemblage). Very true to its style. Waxy, open-textured, very fine and refined. Saffron, yellow flowers, buttercups. Acacia. A little toasted almonds. Mimosa. Elderflower. Even a little rose petal. There’s lovely hint of peach, peach stone and apricot. Stricter than the 2022 and more like the 2021 in a way, this is beautifully shaped – an hourglass on its side. Tender. Fluid. Beautifully sustained by the granular acidity, rippling towards the finish and then releasing sapidity and juiciness. Very pure yet with a certain opulence despite the structuring and structural acidity. Less strict than many of the wines of the vintage and more aerial and ethereal for that. 93-95
Château de France
Château de France (Pessac-Léognan; 50% Merlot; 50% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Very red-berry fruited – strikingly different in that respect from the others in the UGC line-up – with leafy redcurrant, cranberry and even pink gooseberry notes. That makes this sound tarter than it is – for it’s actually sweeter on the palate than that implies. Supple and subtle, but quite energetic and dynamic. Fresh but never tart nor astringent nor dry. Distinctive. I rather like this. A property on an upwards track. 89-91.
Château de France blanc
Château de France blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 80% Sauvignon Blanc; 20% Sémillon; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lithe and limpid, racy and energetic, with the tension and tautness that is the signature of this wine reinforced by the relatively narrow frame. Not terribly complex, but finely judged and accessible immediately. 89-91
Château Ferrande blanc
Château Ferrande blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 40% Sauvignon Gris; 36% Sémillon; 24% Sauvignon Blanc; pH 3.3; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then at Montlabert; Julien Belle from Oenoteam is the consultant here; certified organic). In comparison with de Chantegrive (tasted just before) this seems to have more Sémillon, giving richness and also greater fruit complexity. Pretty aromatically, with peach, nectarine, apricot skin and assorted bitingly fresh citrus notes – citron pressé but also confit lemon and even lemon meringue pie, passionfruit and guava, and those little Sauternais notes so characteristic of this vintage. This is lithe, engaging and dynamic in the mouth, sapid and juicy on the finish. 90-92+
Château Haura
Château Haura (Pessac-Léognan; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 13% alcohol). Naturally sweeter, rich and more plush and plump than Clos Floridène this once again impresses. Bright, fresh, crisp and crunchy red and darker berry fruits, a little hint of heather and moorland flowers. There’s a waft of oak smoke and tabac and a hint of newly scratched leather, also a more ferrous bloody meaty element. Very Graves. Very good in the context of the vintage too. 89-91
Château Haut-Bailly
Château Haut-Bailly (Pessac-Léognan; 58% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; pH 3.65; aged in 50% new oak; 13% alcohol; around half of the total production; tasted with Veronique Sanders at the property). There were no problems of coulure and millerandage here. Sandalwood, graphite, a hint of cedar, plump and plush dark berry and damson fruit. A little pink and green peppercorn. Subtle wild floral notes – small spring flowers. Sage and sprigs of thyme. So soft and gentle on the entry, hyper-layered a little like Don Giovanni’s list of conquests – each time you get to the bottom you find another line, another layer! Super refined, ultra-elegant and transcendent of the challenges we associate with the vintage. A very subtle note of red liquorice. So fine and gentle, so lithe and poised. A very great success. A lovely evolution in the glass too as the cedar starts to emerge. It’s actually very classical. 94-96
Château Haut-Bergey
Château Haut-Bergey (Pessac-Léognan; 51% Cabernet Sauvignon; 38% Merlot; 8% Cabernet Franc; 3% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol). True to its identity, this is one of the most iron-rich aromatically. Dark stone and berry fruits, a sprig of heather and some wild herbal elements. Supple, juicy tannins and quite a succulent mid-palate but one marked its acidity. It’s never quite tart or astringent but it’s quite close to traversing that fine line. A little dry on the finish. 88-90
Château Haut-Brion
Château Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 47.2% Cabernet Sauvignon; 37.5% Merlot; 15.3% Cabernet Franc; a final yield across the two estates of 26 hl/ha for the reds here; pH 3.70; c. 13.2% alcohol; 1.7% press wine). Delicate, again, and intensely floral – with ethereal, subtle but sustained and ultimately quite intense violet and fresh rose petal notes enrobing the soft, plush and plump cherry and dark berry fruits. Ample, again, much like La Mission on the attack with, again, a broad frame. At first one does not notice the tannins, but they become more and more of a presence, descending as if vertically like fine beads of shower spray, pixilating the wine. Not quite the complexity of the greatest vintages from here, accentuated in a way by the ample frame. The élévage will be very important. 93-95
Château Haut-Brion blanc
Château Haut-Brion blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 56.1% Sémillon; 43.9% Sauvignon Blanc; pH 3.22; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; 13.75% alcohol; tasted at La Mission Haut-Brion). Orange blossom. Jasmine. Candlewax. Richer, fuller, maybe a little less ample in frame and with more profundity as a consequence, this is a grand vin blanc de garde. Green tea notes, with a little yuzu, some exotic guava and even mango notes. Rich, full and viscous but in this vintage never lacking in freshness and incisive acidity. Tender and more grippy on the finish that La Mission blanc, but actually richer too. Quite toasty for a young Haut-Brion. Assorted white fleshy fruits – pear and pear belle Helene and also a little, but very subtle, note of apricot and nectarine, even the suggestion of wild strawberry. I like the cascading ripples of freshness that seem to descend from above. Saline on the finish. 94-96
Château La Garde
Château La Garde (Pessac-Léognan; 55% Cabernet Sauvignon; 45% Merlot; a little more press wine than it used to have; Axel Marchal is the consultant here). Pure. Croquant. Bright red and darker berry fruits. Glassy and very fine in its purity and clarity. Layers of silk. Lots of cassis. This is nicely handled and gains in quality with each year. It expresses the vintage just as it deals with its challenges very well. 90-92
Château La Garde blanc
Château La Garde blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 93% Sauvignon Blanc; 7% Sémillo; 13% alcohol; Axel Marchal is the consultant here). Interesting aromatically. Eucalyptus. Incense. Ginger – fresh and confit. Apple, peach, apricot and nectarine, and then 50 shades of citrus. This has a pleasing sense of structural tension, reinforced by the gentle touch of tannin on the finish. Super sapid on the finish. 91-93
Château La Louvière
Château La Louvière (Pessac-Léognan; 17 Sept – 3 Oct; yield of 40 ha/ha; 65% Merlot; 35% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% new oak; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the property and then at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Rich in the context of the vintage. Soft and succulent too. Crushed berry fruits – red and darker – and a veritable bunch of freshly picked wild herbs. Raspberry, mulberry and loganberry. With aeration, more dark cherry notes – but all very fresh. A touch of cassis too. Quite traditional but with very gracious tannins. A little white almond. Creamy on the attack. Cool at the core and nicely structured – more and more sapid with a pleasing sense of grip from the fine grained but granular tannins. Long and tapered. A success. 91-93
Château La Louvière blanc
Château La Louvière blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 43 ha/ha; 13% alcohol; Valérie Lavigne is the consultant here; tasted first at the property, then at the UGC press tasting). Apple core. White grapefruit. A little white peach flesh – just à point. Nettle and greengage. Lemon confit. White flowers. This is richer aromatically than Couhins Lurton but it takes a while to open fully. It’s fleshier on the palate and with a slightly more open texture too. Crystalline, fresh, pure and very well defined in its linearity with a clear and evident central spine. Zesty. Clementine peel. Very fresh and gloriously sapid, with a lovely salinity to the finish. This already has me craving oysters. 91-93+
Château La Mission Haut-Brion
Château La Mission Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 51% Cabernet Sauvignon; 46.5% Merlot; 2.5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield across the two estates of 26 hl/ha for the reds here; pH 3.65; c. 13.2% alcohol; 5.3% press wine). Cool, rather intimate and introvert – that sensation of entering the dark crypt with the residual aromatics of the mass previously performed, above all a hint of myrrh, also candlewax and the plume of smoke from the snuffed candleflame. Iris. Dark berries and cherries, a touch of wild herbs, a little hint of nutmeg freshly grated. Plump, plush, full, broad-shouldered yet with no brutal corners, this is gracious, delicately textured and extraordinarily fine-grained in its tannic profile. The cedar notes are there but very subtly so – just waiting to push through and enrobe all with time in the bottle. A cool focussed precision. Very classical, very harmonious if perhaps not the depth or concentration of the very top vintages. Ethereal nonetheless. 93-95+.
Château La Mission Haut-Brion blanc
Château La Mission Haut-Brion blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 5% Sémillon; 41% Sauvignon Blanc; pH 3.25; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; 13.75% alcohol; tasted at the property). Linden. Lime leaf. Lime zest. Elderflower and even a little elderberry. Cathedral candles and the plume of smoke from the candle snuffer. White pear. A touch of guava – a note that returns on the palate and that slight La Mission exoticism that could almost have us in the kingdom of Sauternes in terms of fruit descriptors. This is crystalline in its purity and precision, radiant and dynamic in the flow of the fruit and the sapidity of the up-flows and resulting eddies of freshness to be discovered in the mid-palate. Very beautiful and very poised, but at the same time a vin de garde that one really needs to cellar. Fresher and more energetic in than freshness and sapidity than Haut-Brion, fresher still with more zest and vim from a second bottle newly opened. 95-97
Château Larrivet Haut-Brion
Château Larrivet Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 62% Cabernet Sauvignon; 25% Merlot; 13% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lovely dark berry and fruits of the forest aromatics, with a sprig or two of sage, marjoram and rosemary. A lovely very pure cassis fruit. Intense on the attack, an impression reinforced by the relatively narrow frame. I love the cedar that seems to rush through the middle as if conveyed through the central spine of the wine. Chewy, fresh and with a hint of menthol lift on the finish. Perhaps the juiciest of the Pessacs in the UGC line-up. There are excellent things going on at Larrivet Haut-Brion these days – this vintage is the product of many of them. 92-94
Château Larrivet Haut-Brion
Château Larrivet Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 84% Sauvignon Blanc; 16% Sémillon; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This is excellent and rather different. Peach and nectarine, a hint of wild strawberry, wild spring hedgerow flowers, fennel tops, freshly cut grass and a hint of exoticism – guava and passionfruit, passionflower too. Freshly grated ginger. But also a distinct oak smoke note. Intense, lifted and aerial and very vertical in its mouthfeel, with a lovely grip from the trace of tannin as an undertone. I like this a lot. 93-95
Château Latour Martillac
Château Latour Martillac (Pessac-Léognan; 59% Cabernet Sauvignon; 28% Merlot; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; 13% alcohol). Dark wild berry fruits – mulberry, bramble and a little black berry. A hint of apple skin too. A baked clay earthiness too and a little thyme. A hint of cedar too. Soft, gentle on the attack and more ample than most. Cool in the mid-palate with ripe and fine-grained tannins and a certain sinuous, succulent and sapid quality in the mouth. Refreshing on the finish, with a pleasing note of walnut and walnut oil. Nicely achieved. 92-94
Château Latour Martillac blanc
Château Latour Martillac blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 60% Sauvignon Blanc; 40% Sémillon; a final yield of 52 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Jasmine, honeysuckle, apricot and nectarine, citron pressé and tarte au citron. A little blanched almond and also fennel fronds. This is exquisite and, rather like Larrivet Haut-Brion tasted alongside, it has a very vertical, almost hour-glass shape in the mouth. Tactile and dynamic and ultra-refreshing in its sapidity, this is a great success. I love the zestiness of the finish. 93-95
Château Lespault-Martillac
Château Lespault-Martillac (Pessac-Léognan; 65% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Petit Verdot; pH 3.63; a final yield of 50 hl/ha; 12.8% alcohol). Plump, plush, and classically Martillac, this is smoky, rich and deep, nicely layered and with a profound dark berry and stone fruit. A lovely creamy texture. Ripe, fine-grained tannins even shape a little plume on the finish. Nicely done and with decent density and concentration for the vintage. There’s nothing dry about it either. 89-91
Château Malartic-Lagravière
Château Malartic-Lagravière (Pessac-Léognan; 84% Cabernet Sauvignon – highest level ever here; 12% Merlot; 4% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 19hl/ha due to mildew losses above all on the Merlot; pH 3.69; 12.5% alcohol; Eric Boissenot is the consultant 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the property and then at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Sandalwood, white almond, almost a hint of horse hair and assorted croquant red and darker berries, a little plum skin too and, with aeration, graphite and a touch of acacia. Damson, redcurrant and mulberry. Lovely cassis appears on the attack – it builds in and through the mid-palate. When first tasted it seemed to tone in and tone out as one comes back to it, as if it’s just a little reluctant to show all that it has; a little more consistent when tasted at the UGC press tasting. The elevated Cabernet works here rather beautifully. Sapid and juicy, energetic and vibrant, this is a good result, but it does lose a bit of shape in the mid-palate which it never quite regains. A touch of dryness on the finish. 91-93+.
Château Malartic-Lagravière blanc
Château Malartic-Lagravière blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 69% Sauvignon Blanc; 31% Sémillon; a final yield of 41 hl/ha; 40% new oak; pH 3.28; 12.5% alcohol; tasted at the property with Severine and Jean-Jacques Bonnie and then re-tasted at the UGC press tasting). Beautifully true to its style and an easy pick. Upright, tense and charged with energy. A touch of iodine and oyster shell, gooseberry, greengage and Mirabelle, green tea, white almond. Apple skin. This has great impact on the attack with lots of vertical range and layering for a white. Some exotic fruits– guava and passionfruit – but predominantly citrus notes, with blood orange, mandarin rind, yuzu and pink grapefruit; white pear and nectarine too. A little fennel bulb. This has a lovely subtle salinity on the finish too. Long and gently tapering. lhere’s pots of aging potential to this but it’s already highly accessible – frankly, deliciously crisp. Apple skin on the finish and a gentle touch of tannin. 92-94
Château Olivier
Château Olivier (Pessac-Léognan; 49% Cabernet Sauvignon; 46% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting). Aromatically very mineral – crushed rocks and a distinctly ferrous note, but then the cherry, stone and berry fruits rush through, a little cedar too. Tight and taut on the attack. But this is another wine that loses a little bit of the shape suggested on the attack in the mid-palate, the fruit delivery just a little un-delineated. 87-89
Château Olivier blanc
Château Olivier blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 80% Sémillon; 20% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 51 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Orange blossom, honeysuckle, a hint of saffron and a cascade of citrus. A little confit melon too. Very crisp and bright, energetic and aerial, yet with a lovely sense of structure, forged as much by the acidity as by anything else. This has a pronounced sense of freshness like a firehose pointed upwards in the mouth spraying juicy sapidity so that it descends down the cheeks. A lovely harmony. 92-94.
Château Pape Clément
Château Pape Clément (Pessac-Léognan; 53% Cabernet Sauvignon; 45% Merlot; 1% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 42 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Intense, deeply dark fruited – with a very Pessac combination of plums, damson and dark berry fruits. A nice floral note too – iris above all. Walnut shell, flesh and skin, a little hint of boudin noir and a waft of oak smoke. This is a stylish and eloquent Pape Clément, as always, but one that seems to take its script from its terroir more than ever. More succulent still at the UGC tasting and I up my note. The oak, often evident at this stage, is beautifully and seamlessly integrated and this is an impressively meaty and substantial wine with grainy, grippy tannins that sculpt a long and tapering finish. 93-95
Château Pape Clément blanc
Château Pape Clément blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 50% Sauvignon Blanc; 43% Sémillon; 7% Sauvignon Gris; a final yield of 37 hl/ha, just a little below the appellation average; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting). Wonderfully true to its style and simply wonderful once again in this vintage. We’ve got a lot more of the exotic notes of the vintage here – guava and pineapple, alongside the more conventional nectarine and white melon, lime and lemon zest and a hint of floral honey and saffron. A signature Pape Clément hint of beeswax. This makes a stark contrast to the grippier, more citrus-oriented and chiselled style of Couhins and Couhins Lurton, but you really want to taste them all. Splendidly juicy and energising in its freshness – that cuts the richness so successfully. That is sometimes my issue with Pape Clément, but not at all in this vintage. 94-96
Château Picque Caillou
Château Picque Caillou (Pessac-Léognan; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 25% Merlot; 10% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 44 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Sumptuous and succulent both for Picque Caillou and for the vintage. Very intense aromatically in its dark berry fruitiness. A lovely damson stone note too and plenty of graphite. Cassis, too, with aeration. Creamy and glossy, if a little lacking in delineation in the mid-palate where it becomes rather monotone. But there is no astringency nor dryness and this has a pleasing balance to it. Likely to prove excellent value. 90-92
Château Picque Caillou blanc
Château Picque Caillou blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 36 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). A wine with the misfortune of coming immediately after Pape Clément in alphabetical order in the UGC tasting, but here it shows really well. Pear, pear belle Hélène, blood orange and orange blossom, even a trace of wild strawberry. I love the gentle viscosity – the texture of the finest tomato consommé and, like that, there’s just a hint of tannin on the finish that I really find enticing. Poised, lithe, delicately balanced and very refined. As good a vintage of this as I can recall. 92-94
Château Smith Haut-Lafitte
Château Smith Haut-Lafitte (Pessac-Léognan; 67% Cabernet Sauvignon; 27% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; 60% new oak; a final yield of 21 hl/ha; tasted first with Fabien Teitgen at the property and then at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lovely aromatics. Demonstratively Cabernet. Cassis, cedar, that stalky leafiness of all Sauvignon varietals at their best, a little bulby florality too – joined by copious bunches of freshly picked flowers at the UGC press tasting. Black cherry. Blackcurrant. A little black berry, all al dente. This feels very ripe and rather special (the selection of the fruit again crucial). One senses from the aromatics already the succulence to be found in the mouth and the svelte tannins – more 2020 than 2024! There’s a little spice from the oak, but more delicate at this stage than usual. Gracious but quite ample on the attack, if of course rather less so than 2022 or 2023. The acidity and the tannins work together a little like a St Emilion from the calcaire plateau St Emilion in layering this (with the Merlot of course planted here on argilo-calcaire soils), with the tannins like glass beads interspersed between the layers. Fresh and mentholated on the finish, again, like Le Petit Smith, but with more of a fantail still. Impressive. I love the crumbly tannins on the juicy finish. 93-95
Château Smith Haut-Lafitte
Château Smith Haut-Lafitte (Pessac-Léognan; 90% Sauvignon Blanc; 5% Sémillon; 5% Sauvignon Gris; a final yield of 32 hl/ha because of the early mildew pressure; 50% new oak; tasted twice, first at the property and then at the UGC press tasting). Wax candles. Linden. Lime. Jasmine. White floral notes – jasmine and elderflower, a little orange blossom too. Green tea and yuzu. A little peach skin, Granny Smith peel and just a hint of guava in all its essential freshness. Structured by the acidity and a little tannin. Even Macha. No signature of the oak, or very little – just a hint of spice. White peach and the texture of the skin – very tactile. So sapid and juicy. One of the best wines ever from here. A pinch from the tannins and then a release of salinity and even a little sweetness. 95-97
Clos Marsalette
Clos Marsalette (Pessac-Léognan; 40% Merlot; 58% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 47 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; certified organic; tasted at Canon-La-Gaffelière with Stephan and Ludovic von Neipperg). Lovely dark berry fruits. Very pure and precise and lifted too. Wild herbal notes. This feels natural and almost wild as is often case here. A touch of blackcurrant, a little cherry, all bright and crunchy. Fresh and pure over quite an ample frame. Chewy tannins but very finely-grained. Delicate and sapid on the finish. Very juicy. Lovely. Easy and likely to be accessible in its youth. 90-92.
Clos Marsalette Blanc
Clos Marsalette Blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 54% Sauvignon Blanc; 46% Sémillon; a final yield of 50 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at Canon-La-Gaffelière). This has a lovely ample frame, once again, but it’s also hyper-fresh and gloriously energetic and fruity. The Sémillon brings a lovely pure peach fruit and lots of succulence with it. Apple skins. Confit lemon. White melon. A touch of passionflower too. Enticing and racy. Salivating in its sapidity. 90-92+
Domaine de Chevalier
Domaine de Chevalier (Pessac-Léognan; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; an impressive final yield of 48 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol, with 0.3 degrees of chaptalisation; tasted twice, first the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). A lovely relaxed aromatic presence – lots of cedar, a touch of graphite and pencil shavings, damson, dark berry fruits and a little black cherry. I love the little floral note too – difficult to pinpoint, but it’s there. Peony is the closest, maybe lily of the valley too. There’s a characteristic glossiness to this that is oh so Domaine de Chevalier. Not the density of recent vintages, but a certain sense of poise and elegance. Nutty notes on the finish indicating ripe pips. 92-94+
Domaine de Chevalier blanc
Domaine de Chevalier blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 75% Sauvignon Blanc; 25% Sémillon; a final yield of 48 hl/ha; pH 3.13; 12.8% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This is lovely. Distinctive, aromatically, with white flowers, nectarine, pear and white melon flesh accompanied by pink grapefruit, blood orange, orange blossom and honeysuckle. There’s a little note of blanched almond and also the creaminess that comes with that. Fine and delicate in the mouth, with a layered sapid freshness but also plenty of density and viscosity (if not that of some recent vintages), rendering this highly tactile and all the more engaging for that. Taut and tense, racy and vibrant. 93-95
Haut-Bailly II
Haut-Bailly II (Pessac-Léognan; 45% Cabernet Sauvignon; 45% Merlot; 8% Petit Verdot; 2% Cabernet Franc; pH 64; 13% alcohol; around 30% of the total production; tasted with Veronique Sanders at the property). A lovely gentle and very natural sweetness here. Plums and a mix of red and darker berry fruits. Almost a touch of confit strawberry. Cranberry. Sandalwood. A nice touch of Haut Bailly graphite. Glossy on the entry with lovely fine-grained tannins, the acidity very well integrated. Plush in the mouth and a good introducton to the grand vin. This shows how good the second wines can be. I love the very fine-grained but tactile tannins on the finish. 91-93
La Chapelle de la Misson Haut-Brion
La Chapelle de la Misson Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 56.3% Cabernet Sauvignon; 29.2% Merlot; 14.5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield across the two estates of 26 hl/ha for the reds here; pH 3.67; c. 12.9% alcohol). Fragrant, quite leafy, with a touch of sweet spice. Soft, gentle and quite delicate with a lovely softness. Walnut oil from the ripe tannins. Densimetric, then optical and then visual sorting was crucial. Gracious, soft and refined, with very fine-grained tannins. Not the deepest, the richest or the most concentrated, but the product of excellent choices with a lovely resulting creaminess. 91-93
La Clarté de Haut-Brion blanc
La Clarté de Haut-Brion blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 64.5 Sémillon; 35.5% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; pH 3.23; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; 13.15% alcohol; tasted at La Mission Haut-Brion). Intriguing. Distinct. Floral, but I can’t quite nail the descriptor. Green tea, black tea leaf, white melon, citron pressé, elderflower and orange blossom, a hint of candlewax. Cool, fresh and intense on the attack, that impression intensified by the narrow frame and the forward thrust on the palate from the attack. Quite intense, dense and concentrated, yet always fresh and always charged with acidity. Maybe lacking just a little complexity, but nicely achieved and very expressive of the vintage. 91-93
Le Clarence de Haut-Brion
Le Clarence de Haut-Brion (Pessac-Léognan; 45.7% Merlot; 32.3% Cabernet Sauvignon; 22% Cabernet Franc; a final yield across the two estates of 26 hl/ha for the reds here; pH 3.65; c. 13.1% alcohol). Darker fruited in a way than La Chapelle, perhaps a little creamier and glossier, more floral with blooms of hibiscus and a little pink rose petal too, more and more in fact with aeration. Ample, generous and gentle on the opening, almost pushing the cheeks and quite lush for the vintage in the mid-palate. Aerial and lifted, if without the full delineation and detail and complexity of Haut-Brion itself. Very attractive and with a lovely uplift of fresh darker berry fruit notes in the midst of the palate, like the fountain outside the tasting room. But a sense a touch of dryness on the finish. 91-93
Le Comte de Malartic blanc
Le Comte de Malartic blanc (Pessac-Léognan; 66% Sauvignon Blanc; 34% Sémillon; a final yield of 41 hl/ha; aged in oak barrels, 10% of which are new; pH 3.28; 12.5% alcohol; tasted at the property). Freshly cut grass, nettles, confit lemon. On the palate, citron pressé predominates, with a little mandarin and pink grapefruit, maybe a touch of guava. Fresh, clean and with plenty of crunchy, bright, fresh-fruited acidity. A touch of Malartic white florality and a certain fleshiness on the mid-palate. 87-89
Le Comte de Malartic-Lagravière
Le Comte de Malartic-Lagravière (Pessac-Léognan; 47% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 19hl/ha; pH 3.54; 12.5% alcohol; Eric Boissenot is the consultant; tasted at the property). The Merlot was depleted by mildew. Nicely done and very much in the style of Malartic. Dark berry fruited with a little damson as well. Wild rosemary. Fresh and plump, no great length with but lovely soft tannins. More red-berried on the finish – cranberries and redcurrant. Juicy and sapid. Nice tension but not too much acidity. 89-91
Le Petit Smith Haut-Lafitte
Le Petit Smith Haut-Lafitte (Pessac-Léognan; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 30% new oak; a final yield of 21 hl/ha; tasted at the property). This has a lovely Cabernet signature – with a certain fresh, almost stalky, leafiness. Cassis, blackcurrant and blackberry. Croquant and à point. There’s a nice grip from the tannins releasing a little wave of sapidity that forms the lifted finish. Liquorice and salt. A little spice adds further interest. Impressively classic given the derisory yields. 90-92+
Le Petit Smith Haut-Lafitte
Le Petit Smith Haut-Lafitte (Pessac-Léognan; 80% Sauvignon Blanc; 20% Sémillon; 50% new oak; tasted at the property). Le Petit is Grand in 2024, un grand vin de table! Granny Smith apple! Iodine, oyster shell, linden, lime and assorted fresh and confit citrus notes. A touch of confit lemon too. Really ample and pushing at the cheeks, like it’s bigger sibling. Lovely sapidity with little plumes of fresh citrus descending like tears down the side of the wine glass. 91-93.
Le Thil
Le Thil (Pessac-Léognan; 94% Merlot; 6% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 21 hl/ha, with the losses almost entirely from mildew rather than any problems during floraison). Glossy. Limpid. Nice graphite notes, a hint of walnut and walnut oil. Fresh. The acidity is a little elevated. But there’s a pleasing harmony to this and the tannins are well-managed and very fine grained. A touch of liquorice at the end (a grating perhaps, not a whole stick!). 88-90
Les Hauts de Smith
Les Hauts de Smith (Pessac-Léognan; 40% Cabernet Sauvignon; 60% Merlot; 30% new oak). Again, quite creamy and glossy, one senses the dominance of the Merlot here. A little frangipane and white almond. A touch of oregano. On the palate, lots of liquorice. Plums and dark berry fruits though certainly in comparison with Le Petit and Smith itself they are a little blitzed. A hint but only that of cedar. Fine, but one feels a little the consequences of the strict selection for the grand vin. 88-90
Les Hauts de Smith
Les Hauts de Smith (Pessac-Léognan; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; 50% new oak; tasted at the property). Glassy, glossy, rich and dense but hyper-fresh and intensely sapid and juicy. Easy, not especially complex I guess, but wondrously refreshing and impressively viscous in the mouth too. Excellent at this level and at its likely price point. Crunchy white fruits and citron pressé. 90-92

Pauillac

Carruades de Lafite
Carruades de Lafite (Pauillac; 47% Merlot; 45% Cabernet Sauvignon; 6% Cabernet Franc; 2% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; 12.9% alcohol; tasted at Duhart-Milon with Saskia de Rothschild). A little closed aromatically when tasted after Duhart under leaden clouds in the chai at Duhart-Milon. The acidity gathers towards the finish and contributes to a sapid wave of energising freshness, but it also destabilises the evolution of the wine over the palate. The slender frame fills out a little with aeration, but this lacks density and compactness. One senses a little the challenges of the vintage and there’s a lot of Merlot in this – not the easiest varietal in these parts in this vintage. A little un-delineated in the mid-palate. The élévage here will be all-important. 90-92
Château Batailley
Château Batailley (Pauillac; 81% Cabernet Sauvignon; 15% Merlot; 4% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 24 hl/ha after significant losses on the sorting table; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then at the property with Frédéric Castéja). This will be released with a special red label to mark the 100th anniversary of the acquisition of the estate in 1924 by the Borie-Castéja family. Cedar, a bulby florality and plenty of dense, dark plum and berry fruit. Whilst I like this a lot, it’s a little austere and almost a tad foursquare for the vintage. It’s almost as if it needs to show itself to be truly ‘of Pauillac’ and definitively not from any appellation further to the south. It feels more stern and taciturn as a consequence (but that is the style here with more extraction than many of its neighbours – and that extraction has been very well-managed). Very much a vin de garde. I find this a little less oaky than it often is en primeur, a positive for me. 91-93
Château Clerc Milon
Château Clerc Milon (Pauillac; 24% Merlot; 66% Cabernet Sauvignon; 8% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; 1% Carménère; pH 3.72; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then with Jean-Emmanuel Danjoy at Mouton-Rothschild). Quite earthy and with a saline-ferrous hint to its minerality, this is impressively monumental in a vintage where that is rare indeed. More floral, more herbal and more subtle too when re-tasted at Mouton Rothschild. Once again, this is a wine that feels very ‘Pauillac’ in the vintage – denser, deeper, richer and more powerful but, despite its succulent and juicy mid-palate, just a little more austere, stern and solid – stolid even – than recent vintages, above all on the finish. Some vintages here feel sunny (solaire); this feels distinctly un-sunny. But there is considerable grace, poise, charm and elegance nonetheless. Silky in its texture and characteristically fresh and vibrant. 91-93
Château Croizet-Bages
Château Croizet-Bages (Pauillac; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; a final yield of 45 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). I like very much the Cabernet Sauvignon signature to the aromatics here. This is quite slender, tight and taut in comparison with its peers and yet the tannins are more severe on the finish where one loses the succulence to be found in the mid-palate. That said, it’s certainly much more fine-grained and crystalline than it used to be. 89-91
Château d’Armailhac
Château d’Armailhac (Pauillac; 72% Cabernet Sauvignon; 14% Merlot; 14% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.69; 12.9% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then with Jean-Emmanuel Danjoy at Mouton Rothschild). This is impressively gracious, with lovely dark berry fruits and a certain creaminess. It has a rather narrower frame than its stablemate Clerc Milon, but with the same beautifully crystalline core. Again, there’s a slight ferrous hint to the minerality. This is a wine that, despite its essential juiciness and the vibrancy that brings, I find just a little taciturn and stern – though less so when re-tasted at Mouton. It is classical in its way but from a somewhat less sunny vintage than is the norm and evidently so, with a notable lift in the acidity towards the finish. 90-92
Château Duhart Milon
Château Duhart Milon (Pauillac; 78% Cabernet Sauvignon; 22% Merlot; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at Duhart-Milon with Saskia de Rothschild). Redoubtably ‘Duhart’ with is intensely dark-berry fruit profile. This is a wine that would be austere even stern were it not for the sheer quality of the tannins that render it almost a little spiritual – an impression reinforced by the subtle floral and incense notes. They remind me a little of the descent into a cool underground chapel. A very pure cassis fruit. Gracious, quite succulent and with a pleasingly spherical core, generously enrobed – almost encrusted – by slightly grippy, granular and very tactile tannins. This has a lovely mouthfeel if not quite the complexity of recent great vintages. 92-94
Château Grand-Puy Ducasse
Château Grand-Puy Ducasse (Pauillac; 56% Cabernet Sauvignon; 39% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 43 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting). The capacity for parcel vinification afforded by the new winery has really helped here. This is aromatically sweet, refined, elegant, highly expressive and very classical in its Pauillac signature. There’s lots of natural sweetness to the dark berry and cassis fruit, a lovely hint of wild rosemary and thyme and, on the palate, great clarity and an almost crystalline purity that is rare in any vintage from here and rare in this vintage in the appellation. It’s certainly light, aerial even, and the extraction has not been pushed, but there is substance too and, with it, aging potential. Very much a success for this newly resurgent property. 91-93+
Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste
Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste (Pauillac; 78% Cabernet Sauvignon; 22% Merlot; a final yield of 38 hl/ha with a little coulure and millerandage responsible for the comparatively modest losses; pH 3.6; aging in oak, 66% of it new; 13% alcohol; tasted at the property with Emeline Borie). Plump in its way, but very refined in its silken layering. A very fresh, bright, croquant and, above all pure and cool dark berry fruit, some red berries bringing additional interest. Not too ample a frame and that seems to extend the vertical dimension – giving this more depth and a milles feuilles texture. Excellent. Very attractive. The gentle extraction and the skilful management of the challenges of the vintage in the vineyard were the keys here. 92-94+
Château Haut-Bages Libéral
Château Haut-Bages Libéral (Pauillac; 94% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Merlot; 1% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; the pH 3.57 is quite high for the vintage, indicating the ripeness achieved; 13% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; Eric Boissenot is the consultant; tasted with Claire Lurton). So vibrant, dynamic and energetic with loads of fresh red berry fruits almost jumping from the glass. Sandalwood – which is for me, alongside the vivid fruit, such a signature of this wine these days. The Pauillac graphite arrives with more and more aeration and with it the fruit profile darkens a little. This will not be difficult to identify blind (though that’s always easier said than done). Supple and sumptuous on the attack, quite ample for the vintage, with impressive density and compactness with the tannins, always soft and gentle, discretely circumscribing the parameters of the flow of the wine and drawing everything back to a well-defined spine. Their crumbly, calcaire identity is very evident on the grippy, sapid and saline finish. A great success as one now expects from Claire Lurton and her accomplished team. Both gracious and yet vivid at the same time (not words used a lot this vintage, certainly not together). 93-95
Château Haut-Batailley
Château Haut-Batailley (Pauillac; 68% Cabernet Sauvignon; 26% Merlot; 6% Petit Verdot; IPT 70; pH 3.63; 12.9% alcohol; tasted first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then re-tasted at Lynch-Bages with Jean-Charles Cazes). Earthy, almost dusty, with a distinctly briny-ferrous twang, this is fresh and croquant in its quite complex fruit profile – quite a lot of red berry fruits alongside the al dente darker berries and the similarly ‘just ripe’ red and darker stone fruits. This is another Pauillac that I find just a little strict and almost austere, but at the same time very northern Médoc in character – the appellation divide between St Julien (in this vintage ‘of the south’) and Pauillac (in this, ‘of the north’) is pronounced. I do love the gently floral aromatics in the empty glass. Plenty of promise and aging potential too. A vin de garde despite the softness of the tannins. 91-93+
Château Lafite Rothschild
Château Lafite Rothschild (Pauillac; 96% Cabernet Sauvignon; 3% Merlot; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 32 hl/ha and representing just a third of the total production; 12.9% alcohol; the first vintage certified organic; tasted at Duhart-Milon with Saskia de Rothschild). Quite plump and plush for the vintage. Like its stablemate Duhart this is very spherical in its shape in the mouth, with gloriously refined cashmere tannins encircling the fresh, bright, crisp and crunchy dark berries and the black cherries – just à point – that form the dense and compact core around which the wine is structured vertically. Horizontally, the wine is again highly structured by a very well-defined central spine around which the graphite seems to gather with the tannins in this dimension stretching out the fruit over the palate. Very classical, very pure and precise, very focussed and always tender, soft and gently seductive. Almost opulent, but never quite, the austerity of the vintage reining it back and rendering this a little more ethereal and also a little more intellectual in the process. 94-96+
Château Latour
Château Latour (Pauillac; 94.6% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5.2% Merlot; 0.2% Petit Verdot; IPT 79; 5.5% vin de presse; 12.85% alcohol; it’s difficult to get to taste this wine this year, so small is the production, with the yield losses from coulure most severe amongst the old vines; the grand vin represents 44% of the total production; tasted at the property). Given the difficulties here arising from the mildew and the difficult floraison, the final wine is excellent. Floral. Subtle. Gracious. Charming. Not overly dense but certainly a step up in concentration from Les Forts and Le Pauillac. More layered, a little more energetic and less plush in a way. It has a much broader frame too, the fruit presented as if in layers of fine silk. The acidity in an essential part of the structure of the wine and it gathers a little towards the finish. But that also renders this very sapid and juicy and I love the aerial menthol note on the quite saline and mineral finish. Not the most complex of recent vintages but very fine and highly refined. This is decidedly delicate for Latour. 93-95
Château Les Sadons
Château Les Sadons (Pauillac; 82% Cabernet Sauvignon; 16% Merlot; 2% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol). The first wine of the appellation that I tasted and, at that stage, one of the best of the Médoc samples. Dark berries and a little stone fruit, an authentic earthy Pauillac minerality and a suggestion of spice but very much in the background – clove, perhaps and nutmeg. Yes, this is a little austere and it lacks complexity, but it’s rather classical and you know where it comes from. It should age gracefully. 88-90
Château Lynch-Bages
Château Lynch-Bages (Pauillac; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 24% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Franc; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 29.5 hl/ha; pH 3.67; IPT 76; aging in oak, 75% of which is new; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin then re-tasted at Lynch-Bages with Jean-Charles Cazes). This feels a little sunnier than most, not unlike Grand-Puy Ducasse at least in that respect. The fruit is a little sweeter and this is more floral than any other of the wines of the appellation at least when presented at the UGC press tasting. Peonies, a touch of saffron and a hint of rose petal. A suggestion of toasted brioche. A hint of graphite. Soft, succulent, open-textured, fluid in the mouth and actually quite sinuous for Lynch-Bages, this has considerable aging potential even if it will be delightfully accessible even in its youth. One of those wines – rare, above all in Pauillac – that seems to transcend the vintage. I might pick this as ‘Lunch Bags’ but I’m not sure I’d pick the vintage in 10 years’ time. 93-95
Château Lynch-Moussas
Château Lynch-Moussas (Pauillac; 78% Cabernet Sauvignon; 22% Merlot; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then again at Batailley with Frédéric Castéja). A bright and very pure red-berry fruit – loganberry and raspberry – mark this out, as they are far from common in the wines of the appellation in this vintage which it typically darker berry fruited. But with aeration, the fruit profile darkens a little with the arrival of damsons and purple plums. This is fresh but the acidity is very well managed and balanced, the oak is very moderate and the result is a finely-finessed wine that will drink well young. The tannins are not as refined as, say, for Batailley, but there’s a sense of Pauillac authenticity than here I like very much. 91-93
Château Mouton Rothschild
Château Mouton Rothschild (Pauillac; 93% Cabernet Sauvignon; 7% Merlot; yields above the appellation average; pH 3.71; IPT 63; 12.9% alcohol; with Jean-Emmanuel Danjoy at Mouton Rothschild). Cedar, but a little less at this early stage then Le Petit Mouton. But is still gives a sense of how this will evolve aromatically. A lovely hint of rose petal. And redder berry fruits too. But then we find, above all with aeration, cassis, bramble, mulberry and black currant – in short, this is very, very Cabernet! A little introvert at this stage, this is all about fruit purity. I find this beguiling and enticing in equal measure, incredibly pure, precise, focussed and then crystalline in the mouth. Here we find the darker stone fruits – damson and cherry and a hint of the cedar to come. There’s more density (still) than Le Petit Mouton and more forward momentum too. Impressively substantial, again spherical at the core but pushing into the cheeks, so with considerable amplitude and a density and concentration largely absent elsewhere. Very aerial on the finish with a lovely Cabernet menthol lift. Incredibly long. This feels exceptionally classy and achieves a greatness in a vintage where that is extremely rare. A genuine vin de garde. 95-97
Château Pauillac
Château Pauillac (Pauillac; 95% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Merlot; a final yield of just 20 hl/ha from the 1.5 hectares here encircled by the parcels of the grands crus classés; from Domaine Peyronie; Michel Rolland and Julien Viaud are the consultants here). Well, there’s no great secret to where this comes from and it’s good to be able to report, as I taste this for the first time, that it does indeed taste like it comes from Pauillac too! Plush and quite plump and juicy on the attack, though with quite a lot of new oak still to resolve, this has a pleasing Cabernet fruit profile and is very classical in style. The tannins gather towards the finish and are just a little assertive and almost a shade dry, but this is solid entry-level Pauillac. 88-90
Château Pédesclaux
Château Pédesclaux (Pauillac; 68% Cabernet Sauvignon; 21% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 36 hl/ha – coulure on the Cabernet being the issue here; pH 3.66; IPT 55; 13% alcohol; tasted at Lafon-Rochet with Vencent Bache-Gabrielsen). A product of the ‘Cabernisation’ (their term) of the vineyard here over the last 15 years underscored by the strict selection for the grand vin. A little closed at first. Not especially ample in frame but with lots of gravitas, cashmere tannins and an impressive sense of layering. This seems simple at first but when the fine-grained tannins start to grip this release a great torrent of fresh dark berry fruits as if pumped into the mouth from the cheeks, bringing great sapidity and textural interest. Fluid, lithe, never opulent but generous and finely detailed. Likely to represent excellent value. 91-93+
Château Pibran
Château Pibran (Pauillac; 54% Merlot – a little more than usual, with more of the Cabernet making the grade for the grand vin; 46% Cabernet Sauvignon; on limestone and gravel; a final yield of 20 hl/ha; 40% new oak; 13% alcohol; pH 3.61; tasted at the property with Pierre Montégut). Wild herbs. Croquant bright red and darker berry fruits. This is very ‘Pichon’ in style with gracious fine-grained tannins and a crystalline core and a certain sense of layering. The tannins are just a tad dry on the finish. 88-90
Château Pichon Baron
Château Pichon Baron (Pauillac; 87% CS – almost at the highest ever level; 13% Merlot; a final yield of 20 hl/ha; pH 3.71; 12.7% alcohol; 70% new oak for around 18 months; bottles; tasted at the property with Pierre Montégut). This has gorgeous and quite distinctive aromatics. There’s a delicate soft petal florality here which is very pretty. Cedar – just a touch. Walnut and white almonds. Oregano and a little wild thyme. In the mouth, this is fresh and sapid from the attack. Layered, with milles feuilles of fine silken sheets. Not massive in its amplitude and that allows a focus on the vertical range and hence the depth, which is considerable. This is quite a deceptive wine in that, at first, it appears if not slender then certainly sleek and delicate. It is, in a way, and the tannins are very fine-grained. But, crucially, is has very considerable depth with a crumbliness to the tannins at the base of the palate that is both very ‘Pichon Baron’ and very classical. 93-95
Château Pichon Comtesse de Lalande
Château Pichon Comtesse de Lalande (Pauillac; 83% Cabernet Sauvignon; 14% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 20 hl/ha – on Cabernet it was millerandage and coulure, for the Merlot it was mildew and millerandage that were responsible for the losses; IPT 70; pH 3.7; press wine at around 16-18%; no sulphites were used in the vinification process; 12.7% alcohol after a little chaptalisation of some plots; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin, then again at the property with Florian Genty; Eric Boissenot is the consultant). Dark chocolate drops, a little violet, less of the cedar that one often discovers from this en primeur, black cherries, a twist of the pencil sharpener and a little hint of freshly crushed green peppercorns with the aromatic lift they bring. So gentle on the attack, we can really only be at this address, but there’s less of the velour of recent vintages. More cedar when re-tasted after decanting at the property. A wine that glistens as it glides over the palate, exuding an effortless elegance and levity – reinforced by the passage from velour to silk in this vintage. Very beautiful and true to its identity, if with not quite the seductive appeal of 2019, 2020 or 2022. That said, it’s still pretty special! 94-96
Château Pontet-Canet
Château Pontet-Canet (Pauillac; 52% Cabernet Sauvignon; 43% Merlot – a little more than usual because of its good quality; 4% Petit Verdot; 1% Cabernet Franc; normal yields were achieved here after 31 treatments against the threat of mildew; 35% less grand vin than last year; 11% vin de presse; 13.1% alcohol; 75 separate vats were vinified; Thomas Duclos is the consultant here; tasted at the property with Mathieu Bessonnet and the family). The aromatics here jump from the decanter and fill the air around the glass. As that suggests, this is very open and expressive. It is very ripe and with a lovely natural sweetness too. With aeration, a the cassis fruit comes to the fore. Black cherry too, even a touch of black forest gateau. Lush, plush and plump on the attack with that pleasing bright, natural sucrosity present immediately in the mouth. Rich and full in a way that’s rare in the vintage, this pushes the cheeks and yet does not lack for depth and density. Slightly toasty. Pretty spherical in form with darker berry and cherry fruits at the top of palate, redder berry fruits and their sapid juiciness gathering at the bottom. Soft and lush this is very well sustained and with a gentle taper towards a distant vanishing point. Quite nutty – walnut, roasted walnut shell and walnut oil. I’m impressed by the very refined tannins that are energising where they massage the fruit, releasing little plumes of freshness. A vin de garde but one accessible in its youth, even if today the tannins remain just a little firm on the finish. 92-94+
Fleur de Pédesclaux
Fleur de Pédesclaux (Pauillac; 46% Cabernet Sauvignon; 34% Merlot; 11% Petit Verdot; 9% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.66; IPT 57; 12.9% alcohol; tasted at Lafon-Rochet). This feels much less like a way of using up the left-overs than many second wines in the vintage. Succulent, juicy and with lovely fruit purity. Simple but very well made and with none of the problems of the vintage evident. 89-91
Le Pauillac de Latour
Le Pauillac de Latour (Pauillac). Pretty. A nice cedary Latourian aromatic profile. This is quite narrowly framed and slender, succulent but definitively light and aerial. It has gracious tannins with just a little grip. It is pure and tender, nicely managed but it lacks complexity. 89-91
Le Petit Mouton
Le Petit Mouton (Pauillac; 67% Cabernet Sauvignon; 26 Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; 2% Petit Verdot; IPT 56; a final yield above the appellation average; pH 3.62; 13% alcohol after a little chaptalisation; with Jean-Emmanuel Danjoy at Mouton Rothschild). Beautiful aromatically, very sleek and pure and crystalline. There’s more cedar here than at any other address. Dark cassis and black cherry fruits. Lush and plush, layered and incredibly harmonious. Ample, mouth filling with the lovely sensation of the viscosity gathering in the form of tears the slowly descend the cheeks. Spherical at the core. The most ultra-fine grained of tannins. A gentle pinch and lift towards a fantail finish. Fabulous. This could be the grand vin of an earlier epoch. The pick of the first growth seconds in 2024 and vintage transcendent. 92-94
Les Forts de Latour
Les Forts de Latour (Pauillac). Very ‘Forts de Latour’ with lots of cedar and graphite, nutty, deep, dark and rich. Floral too, with a little marigold and lily. There’s also a lovely glassy purity to the loganberry and bramble fruit. A few wild herbs. Fresh and pure, quite succulent, even lush. Fluid and bright but with that gravitas of Latour. Chewy on the finish. Light but finely balanced. 91-93+
Les Griffons des Pichon Baron
Les Griffons des Pichon Baron (Pauillac; 56% Merlot; 42% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 20 hl/ha; pH 3.62; 12.9% alcohol; tasted at the property with Pierre Montégut). A jump in quality, this is more precise and focussed, and more pixilated on the palate than either Les Tourelles or Pibran. Glossy with a lovely ‘Pichon’ sheen to the glassy mid-palate. Sapid and juicy. Quite racy. Quite spicy too, with a little graphite and walnut for good measure. Highly recommended. 90-92
Les Tourelles de Pichon Baron
Les Tourelles de Pichon Baron (Pauillac; 65% Merlot; 22% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.59; a final yield of 20 hl/ha; 30% new oak; 13.1% alcohol; tasted at the property with Pierre Montégut). Bright, crunchy plum and berry fruits; the additional Merlot brings a certain density and plumpness to the mid-palate. Creamy and accessible already. Considering the high proportion of Merlot (as ever) in the blend, this is very good. Again, slightly dry on the finish. 88-90
Pastourelle de Clerc Milon
Pastourelle de Clerc Milon (Pauillac; 49% Merlot; 41% Cabernet Sauvignon; 9% Cabernet Franc; 1% Carménère; pH 3.64; 13.2% alcohol). More floral than d’Armailhac, with a little peony and iris bulb. Ample and quite profound with good concentration for the vintage. A weightier perception of layering gives this more of a sense of profundity. The tannins are a little grainer on the finish, but we have much the same crystallinity and purity. This I find more generous than the rather more austere and linear d’Armailhac. 90-92
Réserve de Pichon Comtesse
Réserve de Pichon Comtesse (Pauillac; 72% Cabernet Sauvignon; 24% Merlot; 4% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.7; TPI 65; 12.7% alcohol; tasted at the property with Florian Genty). Cassis and a very gracious stalky florality. This is very pure and aerial, lifted and fine. It is glassy in texture yet layered, but slender in comparison with previous vintages. The silken sheets from which it is formed are interspersed with fine-grained tannins. The choice, the right one for me, has been to maintain the style but at the expense of density and concentration. Fine. Supple. But with just a hint of dryness on the finish. 89-91

Sauternes

Château Bastor-Lamontagne
Château Bastor-Lamontagne (Sauternes; 42% Sauvignon Blanc; 58% Sémillon; a final yield of 13 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Pineapple fresh, roasted pineapple and pineapple chunks (a sweet from my childhood that I suspect few of you will remember). Beurre noisette, lime and lime confit, crème brulée, ginger and preserved ginger. This is rather gloopy in texture and somehow the residual sugar and the freshness seem not entirely in harmony. It needs time to come together. 89-91
Château Coutet
Château Coutet (Sauternes; 98.9% Sémillon; 1% Sauvignon Blanc; 0.1% Muscadelle; 134g/L of residual sugar; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Pear Belle Hélène, butterscotch, wild floral honey and a hint of lemon thyme. On the palate, confit lemon and lemon meringue pie, perhaps a hint of confit wild strawberry. This is distinctive and I’m not sure I’d quite pick it as Coutet. And it almost has too much residual sugar for the acidity, though that’s very much a question of taste. I do like the Seville orange marmalade notes that seem to gather towards the finish giving a sense of how this will evolve – that, and the freshly grated ginger 93-95
Château de Fargues
Château de Fargues (Sauternes). Not yet tasted
Château Guiraud
Château Guiraud (Sauternes; 60% Sémillon; 40% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 12.6 hl/ha; 124 g/L of residual sugar; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Nutty and fresher than most aromatically, with some pleasingly floral notes that remind me a little of Sigalas-Rabaud. White flowers, peach and confit peach, peach jam and, again, confit wild strawberries (a note I find in a few of these wines). Butterscotch and beurre noisette, caramele au beurre salé. Again, not quite as much freshness as I crave, but there’s definitely more botrytis character in this than many. 92-94.
Château Haut-Bergeron
Château Haut-Bergeron (Sauternes; 80% Sémillon; 20% Sauvignon Blanc). Even fresher aromatically than Liot, tasted alongside. Apricot and white pear flesh, Mirabelle and fresh and confit melon. The botrytis is more subtle, but certainly present, bringing a gentle nuttiness to the aromatics. Ample and generous, with ripples of freshness coming up from below to refresh the mid-palate. Not the concentration of some, but very impressive again from this very reliable property. Brilliantly saline in and through the mid-palate to the finish. 91-93
Château La Tour Blanche
Château La Tour Blanche (Sauternes; 80% Sémillon; 15% Sauvignon Blanc; 5% Muscadelle; a final yield of just 6.5 hl/ha; 133 g/L of residual sugar; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lanolin, butterscotch, beurre noisette, white pear and the texture of its skin. Highly concentrated and dense and viscous on the attack, with lots of residual sugar and only just enough freshness to counter it – it comes from the roast and scorched pineapple notes that I really love here. Almost like some 2022s, it’s more the bitterness of burnt sugar than the acidity of the citrus that brings energy and ultimately harmony to this wine. But there is harmony nonetheless. A little lime zest on the finish helps hold this together. This signs off very well and it’s very long. 92-94
Château Lafaurie–Peyraguey
Château Lafaurie–Peyraguey (Sauternes; 100% Sémillon; a final yield of 12 hl/ha, just above the appellation average; picked in three tries; Valérie Lavigne is the consultant here; tasted with Vincent Cruège at Peby-Faugères). Fresh pineapple, scorched pineapple, fresh ginger, lime zest, citron pressé and lemon sorbet. Sesame seed. I find more ginger when re-tasted at Peby-Faugères and a little wild pêche de vigne too. Melon confit. A hint of rose petal too, just on the top of the palate and with it a touch of lanolin. Very fresh, that slightly green highlight in the glass indicating the level of acidity that is so essential to this wine and to its appeal. One of the very best. 96-98
Château Liot
Château Liot (Sauternes; 90% Sémillon; 5% Sauvignon Blanc; 5% Muscadelle). Apricot. Marzipan. Charred pineapple. Confit fruits. Peanut brittle. Olive oil. There’s a good dose of botrytis here. This is plump, juicy and with a pleasing intensity on the attack that is rare for Liot, reinforced by the relatively narrow frame. It tapers off quite quickly on the finish but at its likely price-point this will represent excellent value. It’s a strong showing. 89-91
Château Rayne Vigneau
Château Rayne Vigneau (Sauternes; 72% Sémillon; 28% Sauvignon Blanc; 110 g/L of residual sugar; 13.8% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This is the first of the first growths I get to taste this year and the aromatics already have me in raptures. Lovely, lovely confit lime zest and fresh ginger notes accompany the fresh and charred pineapple and assorted citrus aromatic fireworks. Frangipane and toasted blanched almonds, almost a hint of lanolin. On the palate this is much less concentrated than the 2022 re-tasted from bottle recently. Fresh and dynamic in the crystalline mid-palate with less density but with great complexity. Some will look for more intensity in the mouth and that is the question here. But I’ve never really minded that. The limpidity of this reveals its complexity and I very much enjoy that. 92-94
Château Sigalas-Rabaud
Château Sigalas-Rabaud (Sauternes; 90% Sémillon; 10% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 10 hl/ha; 120 g/L of residual sugar; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lovely. Quite rich for Sigalas, but light in comparison with both Suduiraut and Lafaurie-Peyraguey with its signature white florality. This feels wild and natural and I love the lime zestiness that seems to work here like tannins in a limestone plateau St Emilion, accentuating the sense of verticality. White fruits – pear and a little nectarine. Always those floral notes and a little fennel frond. Exquisitely balanced and both sapid and fresh. As ever, I have something of a coup de coeur for this. 93-95.
Château Suduiraut
Château Suduiraut (Sauternes; 100% Sémillon; a final yield of 11.3 hl/ha; 130 g/L of residual sugar; pH 3.83; 13.9% alcohol; 50% new oak; tasted with Pierre Montégut at Château Pichon Baron). Light gold with those lovely green highlights indicating a fresh vintage with plenty of natural acidity. I love that the first note here is lime and confit lime – this is a wine of a peculiar freshness for the vintage. A little vanilla pod. Lanolin. Pink grapefruit. A little scorched pineapple and fresh ginger. Grapefruit sorbet. Tense and lithe and fresh. Rich and full but never at all too much. A brilliant wine with a wondrously scrunchy acidity that grips this in mid-palate and rotates, like squeezing the water out of a wet towel – fabulous. This reminds me of the 2007, but with more zing! Orange zest and Bergamot marmalade on the finish. 96-98
Clos Haut-Peyraguey
Clos Haut-Peyraguey (Sauternes; 80% Sémillon; 20% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 14 hl/ha, around the appellation average; 130 g/L of residual sugar; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting). This was back on form for me in 2023 and it’s strikingly so in 2024. Wisteria (as used to grow on the Château walls, as I recall from my first ever visit before Bernard Magrez’s acquisition back in the day), lanolin (a note I associate more with Lafaurie-Peyraguey next door, but which shows the return to terroir here for me), candied pineapple and apricot, guava and lime. There’s also a little peanut brittle note and a load of salinity that helps gather the acidity and turn it into sapid freshness. Crucially, it has the freshness from the citrus notes that so many lack. This is brilliant and it also has more density than some of its neighbours. 93-95

St-Estèphe

Château Beau Site
Château Beau Site (St-Estèphe; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 4% Cabernet Franc; 4% Petit Verdot; 22% Merlot; 13% alcohol; Axel Marchal is the consultant here; tasted with Frédéric Castéja at Batailley). Crystalline but dense, compact and quite chewy. This is authentically expressive of its appellation, but with a much more delicate tannic extraction than it used to have. Plummy, a touch of wood smoke and a fair bit of pepper and spice. The acidity is a little elevated on the finish, but overall this is well-managed. 87-89
Château Calon-Ségur
Château Calon-Ségur (St-Estèphe; 82% Cabernet Sauvignon; 9% Merlot; 8% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 45 hl/ha; pH 3.6; 100% new oak but it doesn’t show; 13.1% alcohol; tasted at the property; Eric Boissenot is the consultant here). Radiantly Cabernet and very expressive aromatically. Black currant and black berry, damson and dark plums, a little mulberry and loganberry. A touch of cedar and graphite, pencil shavings and a hint of leather. A little nutmeg too. On the palate, this is characterised by a plump berry and stone fruit and by its velvet texture. It is not especially ample but very soft and spherical and dense at the centre. It is also long and quite linear with the diameter of the spherical core gradually tapering, and always soft and supple. Stylish and nicely done. 92-94+
Château Capbern
Château Capbern (St Estèphe; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; a final yield of 45 hl/ha; pH 3.6; 12.9% alcohol; Eric Boissenot is the consultant here; tasted at Calon-Ségur). Glossily textured, earthy, full and rich. Charcuterie and spice and a little oak smoke, a touch of leather and tabac. Saline. Compact and quite dense. Pure. Fine. 89-91
Château Cos Labory
Château Cos Labory (St-Estèphe; 62% Cabernet Sauvignon; 26% Merlot; 10% Petit Verdot; 2% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.63; IPT 73 – higher than Cos itself; 12.6% alcohol; aging in oak barrels, 20% of them new; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then re-tasted with Dominique Arangoits at Cos; Axel Marchal is the consultant here). Impressively gracious and difficult to pick as Cos Labory for anyone who didn’t taste the 2023 en primeur. Things have really changed here even if this remains a work in progress. Given the northern exposition of most of the parcels here I was expecting something rather more fore-square and austere. What we have instead is a wine of subtle refinement. The tannins are beautifully soft and the cool core is densely packed with dark stone and berry fruits that have a pleasing natural sweetness that I was not expecting. In comparison with Cos itself this is a little more mineral, a little more plum than cassis in its fruit profile and a little less opulent and spicy. It’s more serious but I love that too and it’s very true to its terroir, the tannins a little more grippy at this stage. The ‘Cos’ touch brings a little sweet spice and actually rather more cracked black pepper and that combines nicely with the almost iodine and saline note that characterises the minerality here. 91-93+
Château de Pez
Château de Pez (St-Estèphe; 69% Cabernet Sauvignon; 24% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; 5% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 27 hl/ha; pH 3.6; IPT 65; aging in oak, 50% of it new; 12.9% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then with Florent Genty at Pichon Comtesse de Lalande). This really impresses me in its lithe and sinuous mouthfeel, its inherent juiciness and sapidity and, above all, in its radiant and lifted florality. A slightly more plummy fruit than Pichon Comtesse but lots of dark berries as well – brambles, mulberries, black berries. All very soft and succulent, the infusion extraction is very important texturally here. But what I also like is that, despite all of those things that might lead one to place this further south, the core of the fruit profile here remains redolently expressive of its distinctly St-Estèphe terroir. The progress here over the last 5 vintages is considerable as this shows so well. 92-94+
Château Haut-Marbuzet
Château Haut-Marbuzet (St-Estèphe; 50% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Cabernet Franc; 5% Petit Verdot; tasted twice with similar notes). A rather attractive vintage of Haut-Marbuzet and a good follow-on from the impressive 2023 that reinforces the impression of a slight change in style here. There’s less showy new oak to this and the accent now is much more on the purity of the fruit. Plums, damsons, brambles and a little graphite and pencil lead, this it rather classical, but also very pure and fluid over the mid-palate. I like the subtle note of mint on the finish. Stylish and quite sleek. 89-91
Château La Rose Brana
Château La Rose Brana (St-Estèphe; 55% Cabernet Sauvignon; 43% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc). Very St-Estephe and very much of the vintage too, this is a little stern and strict, with quite a volume of tannin still to resolve. It feels wild, northern and almost wind-swept but the dark berry fruits are fresh and crunchy and the tannins have been well-managed. It lacks a little differentiation and delineation over the palate and there is no mistaking a certain austerity, but it’s been well made. 87-89
Château Laffitte Carcasset
Château Laffitte Carcasset (St-Estèphe; cru bourgeois exceptionnel). More ‘f’s and ‘t’s than any other Laf(f)it(t)e and quite a lot of extraction in this vintage too. Oaky. To be fair, it’s not dry on the finish and neither is it tart or astringent, which is already an achievement. But it’s a little unrefined and un-delineated on the palate and the fruit a little blitzed. Less might have been more here. 87-89
Château Lafon-Rochet
Château Lafon-Rochet (St-Estèphe; 72% Cabernet Sauvignon; 25% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; 40% new oak; pH 3.67; IPT 67; 13% alcohol; first vintage certified organic; tasted at the property with Vincent Bache-Gabrielsen). This has the highest even proportion of Cabernet in the blend. Floral and with a trace of heather – that wild moorland note one now looks for as the signature of the property. Very cassis with its vertical presence in the mouth rendering this lifted and bright, crisp and vivid, There’s a touch of cedar. Pure, precise, focussed and with lots of elegance. A lovely tapering finish too – very long and linear and less granular in its tannic presentation than before. Chewy grape skins on the finish. 92-94
Château Le Boscq
Château Le Boscq (St-Estèphe; 52% Merlot; 39% Cabernet Sauvignon; 7% Petit Verdot; 2% Cabernet Franc; in the last year of organic conversion and with 20% less crop than usual; 13% alcohol; tasted twice with similar notes). Authentic. Spicy, rich and quite plummy with additional assorted dark berry fruits. A nice trace of iron minerality, a gentle .smokiness and a little iodine and sea spray. There’s almost a hint of Basin d’Arcachon oyster shell. Bright and creamy with lots of cassis. Nicely done. Very darkly fruited 90-92
Château Le Crock
Château Le Crock (St-Estèphe; cru bourgeois exceptionnel; 54% Cabernet Sauvignon; 34% Merlot; 7% Cabernet Franc; 5% Petit Verdot; tasted twice with similar notes). Always a bit of a weathervane wine that gives a broader sense of the vintage. This is very fine, with lovely glossy yet beady fine-grained tannins over which the dark berry and stone fruit seems to glide, but there’s also no mistaking the austerity of the vintage up here in the north. This almost feels like it comes from a windswept moorland! Damson skin. Blueberries. Just a hint of the graphite and cedar that, with time, will bring a slightly sweeter note to this I suspect. It will need careful élévage but the wine opens nicely in the glass and I think this will evolve well. 89-91
Château Les Ormes de Pez
Château Les Ormes de Pez (St-Estèphe; 48% Merlot; 41% Cabernet Sauvignon; 6% Petit Verdot; 5% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.61; IPT 69; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then re-tasted at Lynch-Bages with Jean-Charles Cazes). Impressively floral and less austere than I have to admit I was anticipating! There’s a gentle natural sweetness to the purple berry fruits here that is very impressive. Soft and succulent in the generous mid-palate, this is very nicely achieved. Refined and elegant and now competing with de Pez in terms of the quality of its tannin management, which is saying something! 90-92
Château Lilian Ladouys
Château Lilian Ladouys (St-Estèphe; 66% Merlot; 17% Cabernet Sauvignon; 14% Petit Verdot; 3% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; 30% new oak; pH 3.7; IPT 65; 12.9% alcohol; first vintage certified organic; tasted at Lafon-Rochet with Vincent Bache-Gabrielsen). There’s acrtually more Merlot and Petit Verdot here than usual. Bright, fresh, quite lifted and with a rich plum and fresh raspberry fruit. Gourmand. Rather vibrant. Tender and chewy, but with an impressively clear and limpid mouthfeel, the tannins very refined at this level. 89-91
Château Meyney
Château Meyney (St-Estèphe; 64% Cabernet Sauvignon; 26% Merlot; 10% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; tasted three times with convergent notes). Plump and plush with briary fruits and that wild moor-side heather and wild herbal signature that it so often has, a ferrous hint to its minerality and a fair amount of substance. Quite a big wine and one that doesn’t have quite the delineation in the mid-palate of the classed growths. Chewy, bold, vibrant and authentic, there’s a lot to like here, but it’s not at the level of the 2019, 2020, 2022 or 2023. 89-91
Château Montrose
Château Montrose (St-Estèphe; 80% Cabernet Sauvignon; 17% Merlot; 3% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 38 hl/ha with no problems of slow or uneven floraison up here in the north of the Médoc – a little loss on the Merlot due to mildew; around 15% vin de presse; IPT 77; organic certification will come this year; a colossal amount of work with up to 200 people working in the vineyards at many periods during the season; 24 treatments against mildew, a record here; sorting was less important here because of the work already performed in the vineyard; 90 different lots vinified separately because of the reasonably good yields; tasted at the property with Vincent Decup). Sourced exclusively from Terrace 4, the first part of the property to be planted well before the classification. Tasted just after Terrace III, it is difficult to imagine that this could be better. It is. Even more intense in its florality. Again, wisteria and now with a little iris too. Many wines of the vintage have a bulby character to their florality. Not here. This is all about the petals. It’s very delicate. There’s a hint of violet too but it doesn’t overpower the more subtle floral notes that feel very natural and that take the limelight. Graphite and deep dark berry fruits on the palate – black berries, brambles and mulberries. A little red cherry. The fruit profile is rather more familiar than for the Terrace III wine. There’s more gravitas, depth and profundity too. The wine also seems to gather more towards the bottom of the mouth and has more amplitude in its depth. It’s a little more serious but never austere. I love the contrast. The left-bank wine of the vintage 96-98+
Château Montrose Terrasse III
Château Montrose Terrasse III (St-Estèphe; 61% Cabernet Sauvignon; 27% Merlot; 12% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; around 15% vin de presse; IPT 77; last year before organic certification; tasted at the property with Vincent Decup). The first vintage of this to be presented en primeur even although it will not be released en primeur. Gracious. Glossy, creamy and extremely open and elegant. Beautiful aromatically and incredibly poised, this is a wine that prompts a very physical but at the same time emotional reaction in me – goosepimples and, if I’m honest, a tear in the corner of my eye (reinforced I think by this being the first time I’ve tasted this). Damsons and mulberries. Peony and wisteria. Aand all with a wondrously eloquent purity. So supple and gracious on the palate, not too ample and with an incredible natural swirling brilliance in the mouth, with more of more menthol notes released as the ripples and eddies of freshness seem almost to build into a vortex. Gloriously tactile and very exciting. I’m in raptures (as you can probably tell)! 94-96+
Château Phélan-Ségur
Château Phélan-Ségur (St-Estèphe; 68% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 2% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; pH 3.72; 13% alcohol; tasted twice with similar notes). This is very classy and refined in an appellation where that is difficult to achieve in this vintage. Graphite, lead pencil shavings and classical dark berry fruits intermingling with heather and moorland flowers and herbs, this has a very beautiful restraint to its aromatic profile. Saline and slightly ferrous in its minerality. Slender framed, accentuating the sense of depth and layering, which it needs in a way. The extraction has been very gently managed here and the effect is to produce a lovely translucence to the mid-palate. It does not have the density of impact or concentration of the 2020, 2022 or 2023, but it reflects a fine set of choices. A great success once again in the context that matters – that of the vintage. 92-94
Château Tour des Termes
Château Tour des Termes (St-Estèphe; cru bourgeois supérieur; tasted twice with similar notes). Less marked by some of the trials and tribulations of the vintage than many up here in the North. Quite a generous and rich aromatic profile, with a combination of red and darker berry fruits and a little plum. On the palate this is perhaps a little monotone and lacks delineation over the palate, but it’s nicely shaped and the challenges of the vintage have been well-handled. 87-89
Cos d’Estournel
Cos d’Estournel (St-Estèphe; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 38% Merlot; 0.5% Petit Verdot; 1.5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of around 30 hl/ha; pH 3.57; IPT 71; aging in oak, 50% of it new; 12.8% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin and then at the property with Dominique Arangoits and members of the Reybier family). Profound. Cool and inviting. That sensation of descending the stone steps down into the crypt, with a hint of candle smoke and incense alongside the dark berry and stone fruits – cassis, damson, a little very dark chocolate, bramble, mulberry, graphite. This is cool and svelte on the entry. Impressively broad-framed and impressively layered – the gravitas from the layering here producing a greater vertical range because of the thicker layers (not silk, nor even cashmere but velvet). But what I like most is that this remains pure and clear and limpid and crystalline – like the surface of a wide lake at night. The cassis builds with aeration rendering this very classical. Gorgeous texturally. 94-96
La Dame de Montrose
La Dame de Montrose (St-Estèphe; 73% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon; 4% Petit Verdot; 3% Cabernet Franc; IPT 70; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; organic certification will come this year; tasted at the property). So Montrose already, with lovely intense dark glossy berry fruits that are so pure and precise and pixilated in their detail. There’s a trace of Montrose graphite too and a little wild raspberry and loganberry. Broad in frame, but not too broad, with lovely layers of cashmere. A wine of great purity and clarity but with lovely grip and shape from the tannins drawing the wine downwards horizontally in the mouth. Clean and long on the finish. 90-92
Les Pélerins de Lafon Rochet
Les Pélerins de Lafon Rochet (St-Estèphe; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 24% Merlot; 6% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; aging in oak, 30% of which is new; pH 3.7; IPT 65; 12.9% alcohol; this is the first vintage certified organic; tasted at the property with Vincent Bache-Gabrielsen). Supple and juicy, fresh, bright, crunchy Cabernet fruits with a little damson. Nicely clear, clean, lithe and sapid. Well done if lacking a little complexity. 88-90
Marquis de Calon
Marquis de Calon (St-Estèphe; 63% Merlot; 37% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 45 hl/ha; pH 3.55; 13.2% alcohol; tasted at Calon-Ségur). Rich, plump, pulpy, saline and spicy. Fresh and baked plums. The tannins are finely-grained and this is soft on the attack, but it feels just a little shapeless on the palate. That said, the nice grippy tannins help pull this back together on the finish. 88-90
Pagodes de Cos
Pagodes de Cos (St-Estèphe; 43% Cabernet Sauvignon; 50% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; 2% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.52; IPT 65; aging in oak, 20% of it new; 12.7% alcohol; the thirtieth anniversary vintage marked with a rather beautiful etched bottle design; tasted at the property with Dominique Arangoits). Richer, fuller, spicier and less ample in frame that G de Cos but that gives this more vertical range and a greater sense of depth and profundity. Damson, cassis and assorted plums. Sapid and intensely juicy. A little gentle aeration in the mouth releases swirls and eddies of dark berry fruits that circle and swirl along and even between the layers. Somewhere between silk and cashmere and very true to its Cos identity. Quite succulent and tactile but luxuriant too. 91-93+

Haut-Médoc

Château Beaumont
Château Beaumont (Haut-Médoc; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 43 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). It’s always good to taste this before Beychevelle. It typically gives a sense of what to expect. And this is very well done and, as ever, cut from the same stylistic cloth. Quite succulent and nutty and creamy in the mid-palate, but sapid and juicy too. Not the complexity and sheer class of some recent vintage, but certainly well-managed. Impressive texturally. 88-90
Château Belgrave
Château Belgrave (Haut-Médoc; 64% Cabernet Sauvignon; 36% Merlot; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Quite delicate aromatically, with subtle and quite classical cedary notes enrobing the fresh, crisp, bright dark berry fruits. A little hint of almond. On the palate this has a rather pinched and tight frame, slender for a classed growth in any vintage. But that has its advantages. The extraction is gentle, the tannins fine-grained and this is quite sinuous. But it’s decidedly light and won’t be to all tastes. 88-90
Château Cantemerle
Château Cantemerle (Haut-Médoc; 73% Cabernet Sauvignon; 18% Merlot; 7% Cabernet Franc; 2% Petit Verdot; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin; Eric Boissenot is the consultant here). Much more floral and Margellais than the other classed growths of the appellation, other than La Lagune (tasted later), with a gorgeously lilac and violet note to the aromatics. Dark cherries and blueberries, a few blackcurrants too. Soft and gracious on the attack with a lovely mouthfeel. It’s a little pinched towards the finish and becomes increasingly linear – but that gives it the sustenance to linger long on the palate. Some, I know, will covet more weight, depth and density, but I enjoy this more delicate style, above all in a vintage like this and I like the consistency of the work that is going on here. 91-93
Château de Camensac
Château de Camensac (Haut-Médoc; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; a final yield of 44 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Earthy, almost clay-y, in its minerality. Red and darker berry fruits, a little cherry and a sprig or two of oregano. More ample than Belgrave and more crystalline too, with the fruit having more space to glide and circle in. But it’s rather monotone. Texturally, this is well-achieved but it’s hardly the most exciting of wines. 87-89
Château de Lamarque
Château de Lamarque (Haut-Médoc; 64% Cabernet Sauvignon; 20% Merlot; 16% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 38 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted only once at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). A hint of bulby florality that I like and that works well with the dark stone and berry fruits. There’s a hint of cedar too. Quite classical and with a soft and caressing, stylish, mouthfeel. Creamily textured. Likely to represent excellent value. Promising. 88-90
Château de Malleret
Château de Malleret (Haut Médoc; cru bourgeois exceptionnel; 66% Cabernet Sauvignon; 34% Merlot; 12.8% alcohol). This is excellent and shows just how good some of the crus bourgeois exceptionnels now are, above all in the context of challenging and technical vintage. This has a very pure, precise and distinctive florality and a lovely dark berry fruit profile – blackberry, blackcurrant and blueberry, maybe a little black cherry too (showing the ripeness). Plump and succulent on the palate, with plenty of flesh and circulating up-swells of fresh sapid juiciness. Better than a number of the classed growths. 90-92
Château Fleur la Mothe
Château Fleur la Mothe (Médoc; cru bourgeois supérieur; 45% Cabernet Sauvignon; 35% Merlot; 20% Petit Verdot). Riper than most of its neighbours with an earthy minerality alongside the crushed berry fruits aromatics – red plums, black berries and blackcurrants, a wild herbal note too. Pure and precise, with ripe and gently supporting tannins elongating the finish. Relatively simple and not at the level of the last two vintages, but nicely done in the context of the challenges of this one. 87-89
Château La Lagune
Château La Lagune (Haut-Médoc; 52% Cabernet Sauvignon; 42% Merlot; 6% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 26 hl/ha; pH 3.4; 13% alcohol; certified biodynamic; tasted only once, at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Radiantly aerial aromatically, with more lift than the other wines of the appellation and that floral touch that reminds one we’re near the appellation boundary with Margaux – something only t found elsewhere in this vintage at nearby Cantemerle. But this is a different kind of florality, more vivid and bright and lifted – white spring flowers freshly plucked from the hedgerow. As ever this feels very natural and I love the cedary notes in the depths of the mid-palate. This is one of the rare wines of the appellation with depth and layering in the mid-palate. Plump, plush and juicy; succulent, fresh and lifted on the finish. Vivid in a way that few achieve in the vintage. Very fine, refined, natural and harmonious. 92-94+
Château La Tour Carnet
Château La Tour Carnet (Haut-Médoc; 63% Merlot – by some way the highest proportion in the Médoc; 33% Cabernet Sauvignon; 3% Petit Verdot; 1% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of just 25 hl/ha over the property’s vast 234 hectares; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting). This, as ever, is very well made with nothing out of place. Very technically accomplished, it is plush and soft and seductive, the fruit pure and croquant without ever hinting at astringency and the tight, taut and slender frame gives this a sense of depth and density that it might otherwise lack. It’s relatively short on the finish but it definitely reflects a series of good choices. Balanced and harmonious; cool and soft. 88-90
Château Paloumey
Château Paloumey (Haut-Médoc; cru bourgeois exceptionnel; 58% Cabernet Sauvignon; 39% Merlot; 3% Petit Verdot; certified organic Impressively pure and crystalline with plenty of precision and also energy and vivacity – another excellent advertisement for organic viticulture even in what must have proved a challenging vintage. Intense dark berry fruits and a hint of graphite. Thyme. Bay leaf. This is long and gently tapering, the tannins very polished and gracious. 87-89
Château Potensac
Château Potensac (Médoc; 45% Cabernet Sauvignon; 33% Merlot; 22% Cabernet Franc – all old vine; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 12.2% vin de presse; IPT 74; pH 3.63; 12.9; tasted at Château Nénin). Lovely dark plum and bramble fruits. Crunchy, pure and nicely focussed. A lovely mouthfeel and I really like the shapely flow of the wine over the palate. Grippy tannins form and mould (rather than sculpt) the lifted finish. There’s just a hint of dryness on the finish (note the IPT at 74) but this is very well done. In the context of the vintage there’s a lot of wine here for the money. 88-90
Château Sénilhac
Château Sénilhac (Haut-Médoc; cru bourgeois; from 22 hectares on argilo-calcaire; 58% Merlot; 31% Cabernet Sauvignon; 11% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; tasted at Château Larteau). Lithe and limpid, a nice mouthful of ripe berry fruits. Fresh, bright and crunchy – more red berries and plums than darker fruits, but with a little damson. Salt and pepper from the Petit Verdot. Nicely done. This certainly merits its classification. 87-89
Château Sociando Mallet
Château Sociando Mallet (Haut-Médoc; 57% Merlot; 43% Cabernet Sauvignon; 13% alcohol; tasted twice). A little closed at first but very pure and dark-fruited, crystalline too with a nice sense of purity and focussed precision. Cassis and graphite. Quite ample, limpid and lithe. No great concentration but very authentic and well-managed. Bright and croquant in its fruit profile. Quite juicy on the finish. Another success from a persistent over-achiever. 90-92
G d’Estournel
G d’Estournel (Médoc; 61% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Sauvignon; 8% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; pH 3.61; IPT 69; aging in oak barrels, 12% of them new; 12.2% alcohol; tasted with Dominique Arangoits at Cos d’Estournel). Distinctive aromatically and very northern Médocain in its personality. Iodine and sea salt, sea spray, a dark plummy fruit with brambles and black berries too. A hint of oak smoke. Ample, in its style, though with much less oak than of old, nicely layered and yet at the same time quite sinuous. Juicy. Fine and chewy on the finish. This has been expertly managed. 89-91
Haut-Médoc de Giscours
Haut-Médoc de Giscours (Haut-Médoc; 57% Cabernet Sauvignon; 38% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; 12.70% alcohol; tasted at the property with Jérôme Poisson). Plush and plump. Dark berry fruited. A little cherry and graphite, even a little ‘Giscours’ cedar. This is now to Giscours what Beaumont is to Beychevelle – namely, stylish, very well made and with the signature of the more illustrious property. Plush with a lovely juicy plum and red berry fruit. Glacial and cool at the core, quite ample in the mouth and finely-textured. 88-90
La Siréne de Giscours
La Siréne de Giscours (Haut-Médoc; 52% Cabernet Sauvignon; 48% Merlot; 35 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at the property with Jérôme Poisson). Darker berry fruited than the Haut-Médoc – we move from raspberry to mulberry and black berry, a touch of bramble too. But it’s similar in form and style and equally well made. The sheets of layered fruit are just as ample but a little fuller, giving this a lovely creamy texture. There’s a hint of ferrous minerality that I don’t find in the grand vin. 89-91
Madame de Beaucaillou
Madame de Beaucaillou (Haut-Médoc; 63% Merlot; 3% Petit Verdot; 34% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 24 hl/ha after lots of sorting; same volume as last year but produced from an additional 20 hectares in Cussac, largely of Cabernet Sauvignon on gravel; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at Ducru Beaucaillou). Crunchy, with bright dark berry fruits, bay leaf and a little dark stone fruit. Nicely pure and ripe. A trace of graphite. Impressive for the appellation. The tannins are quite chunky but this gives the impression of coming from a somewhat riper vintage in the end. Well done. 88-90+

St Julien

Château Beychevelle
Château Beychevelle (St Julien; 55% Cabernet Sauvignon; 42% Merlot; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 41 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted twice, the first time at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). The most floral of the classed growths of St Julien and very pretty aromatically once again. We could almost still be in Margaux, but for the distinct walnut and blanched almond notes. There’s a creamy richness to this that is impressive too. The fruit – red berries, a little red cherry, some black cherries too – is picture-perfectly pure and precise and there’s a generosity to the mid-palate that sets this above most of its peers. Shimmering in its succulence on the juicy finish. 92-94
Château Branaire-Ducru
Château Branaire-Ducru (St Julien; 72% Cabernet Sauvignon; 22% Merlot; 3.5% Cabernet Franc; 2.5% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 41.5 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the first time at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Another great success from Branaire-Ducru – and it’s release price something of a no Bra(i)n-er (if you’ll excuse the pun). This is very spherical at the core with a dense, fully-charged mid palate. Brambles and damsons and dark plum and assorted stone fruits, a little hint of wild Italian herbs and crushed green peppercorns. There’s an interesting floral note too that I can’t quite pin down to a single descriptor – wisteria doesn’t quite capture it but is the closest I seem to get. Sapid and juicy, long and racy on the finish, with a note of dark chocolate appearing right at the end. 92-94
Château Ducru Beaucaillou
Château Ducru Beaucaillou (St Julien; 86% Cabernet Sauvignon; 14% Merlot; a final yield of 20 hl/ha with mildew on the Merlot, green harvesting of the Cabernet Sauvignon and some bleeding of the tanks; IPT 87; tasted with David Duran at the property; 13.2% alcohol). Brilliant in the fabulous purity of it cassis and blackcurrant fruit. A hint of violet, in fact more than that and, if more subtly, peony petals. Wild rosemary too. This is very concentrated and yet, at the same time, aerial and lifted. Walnuts. Lots of graphite. Cedar, but just a subtle hint at this stage. Massive for the vintage, dense and highly compact and very difficult to pick as a 2024. Totally true to its style – magisterial, a little monolithic perhaps but very impressive. The tannins are considerable but very ripe. This is the only left back wine of the vintage with almost a blackhole concentration at its core. Long and gently tapering on the finish with lots of gravitas. Quite an achievement and vintage transcending in its way. Not subtle, but great. Something of a colossus in a vintage of mortals. 92-94+
Château Gloria
Château Gloria (St Julien; 56% Cabernet Sauvignon; 32% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; 7% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Gloria in excelsis! This is good in the context of this and any vintage. Lithe and limpid and fresh and juicy. Soft and tactile, this is a wine of cashmere texture with a long and gently tapering finish sustained by very fine-grained but still grippy tannins. Glory be! 92-94
Château Gruaud Larose
Château Gruaud Larose (St Julien; 81% Cabernet Sauvignon; 17% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc – sourced almost entirely from Terrace 3; pH 3.77; a final yield of 31 hl/ha; 12.39% alcohol; certified organic; tasted only at the property). Profound and very beautiful aromatically. Yet slightly introvert and a little closed at first. Damson, blueberry and black berry, black currant and subtle cassis with gentle aeration. Blanched almonds and a little of their creaminess. In the mouth, there’s some Griotte cherry, a hint of peony and maybe lily of the valley too. Succulent and luxurious in its texture. Suave, quite full and ample in frame, this pushes at the cheeks. I love how the fresh juiciness seems to gather at the top of the palate and, with a sensation of greater viscosity, glide down the cheeks like ‘tears’ descending the sides of a glass. Not, of course the density and concentration of the last couple of vintages, but beautifully managed, very vibrant and fresh and yet with no astringency or dryness. In fact we have a lovely juiciness on the finish and we are left with a very persistent sensation of chewy grape skins. 94-96
Château La Bridane
Château La Bridane (St Julien; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; tasted twice). One of those rare things, a non-classified wine from St Julien, and always excellent value partly as a consequence. This is very true to its appellation, possibly made more noticeable by tasting it after a series of Haut-Médocs. Plump and plush on the attack with a mix of cherry and berry fruit and a distinctive hint of walnut oil and the slight richness and generosity that implies. I like the touch of graphite too. The palate is quite open-textured and ample and that makes the fruit appear just a little thinly stretched. A little clumsy on the finish too. But promising nonetheless. 87-89.
Château Lagrange
Château Lagrange (St Julien; 84% Cabernet Sauvignon; 10% Merlot; 6% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 26 hl/ha with no chaptalisation but some reverse osmosis; 12.9% alcohol). Unusually this was not presented at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin. But I did track it down at two négociant tastings on consecutive days. On both occasions the samples (possibly from the same batch) were problematic. I will need to re-taste. Not rated
Château Langua Barton
Château Langua Barton (St Julien; 52% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 8% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Lush and plush and very true both to its identity and to its appellation and terroir. It’s rather more ample in frame than, say, Gloria and more effusive and demonstratively juicy for that. But that also reinforces the slightly grainy character of the tannins which, though never dry, become slightly disruptive of the sinuous flow of the wine over the palate. I love the frangipane and toasted almond creaminess nonetheless. The élévage here will be important. 91-93+
Château Léoville Barton
Château Léoville Barton (St Julien; 92% Cabernet Sauvignon; 6% Merlot; 2% Cabernet Franc; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This has a most gracious purple florality that I love, a hint of rose petal too and all of that signature Léoville Barton dark berry and damson fruit. Very classical and very refined, with oodles of cedar. There’s a lot of wine here in a vintage in which that is not something one says very often. Classicists will be very happy with this in a vintage that is perhaps easier for néophytes! 93-95
Château Léoville Las Cases
Château Léoville Las Cases (St Julien; 84% Cabernet Sauvignon; 11% Cabernet Franc; 5% Merlot; a final yield of 31 hl/ha; IPT 76; pH 3.6; 6.3% vin de presse; 13.1% alcohol; tasted only one, at Chateau Nénin). Walnut and walnut oil. Graphite and a hint of the cedar to come. A very gracious intense dark black cherry and blueberry fruit; raspberry and mulberry. Cool and luxuriant. Sumptuous as St Julien as its very best should be. Not a massive frame, but massive depth and profundity above all in the context of the vintage. Black cherries form the frame and then we have, with the touch of the gentle tannins, the release of the more intensely sapid fresh berry fruits – all dark at first, but shading towards raspberry after a while. The dynamism in the mouth is fabulous – not vertical but more horizontal. We have swirls and eddies of freshness, but like a wide river turning a corner, as there is considerable viscosity to the waters in motion. Exciting and dynamic. Gracious, long, classical and slowly tapering on the finish. I love the gentle sweetness on the finish – unusual in the context of the vintage. A vin de garde in the best of traditions. Grape skins on the finish. A touch of fresh mint too. 93-95+
Château Léoville Poyferré
Château Léoville Poyferré (St Julien; 64% Cabernet Sauvignon; 27% Merlot; 8% Cabernet Franc; 1% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 26.4 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This, too, is near the top of the pyramid in this vintage. Very elegant, refined and stylish with a glorious combination of both graphite and cedar generously enrobing the damson and purple berry fruits. Very darkly fruited in fact, even for Poyferré. In the mouth this has quite a narrow frame adding to the sense of profundity, depth and concentration that it would lack were it more ample. Not the most opulent or sumptuous vintage (a lovely contrast to Léoville Barton for instance and in this respect), but it is still a very beautiful expression of its terroir. I love the fresh verbena and menthol notes on the finish. 93-95
Château Saint-Pierre
Château Saint-Pierre (St Julien; 85% Cabernet Sauvignon; 12% Merlot; 3% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 29 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). After the glories of Gloria one comes to this with a sense of eager anticipation (not always the case in a vintage as tricky as this). One it right to do so. For this is to Gloria what Leoville-Barton is to Langoa in this vintage, as it so often is. Sumptuous, succulent and juicy and with a most gorgeous cedary note seemingly unleashed from the depths of the mid-palate with aeration in the mouth. Vert classy indeed if perhaps just a little more shapeless on the finish than the tighter and more linear Gloria in this vintage. But what we have, in short, are two great expressions of this vintage. 92-94+
Château Talbot
Château Talbot (St Julien; 70% Cabernet Sauvignon; 25% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Pretty aromatically, this is another St Julien that is very floral in this vintage. There’s a lovely earthiness to this too that gives this more of a sense of gravitas – somehow it grounds the wine, almost literally. I like very much the ‘Talbot’ nuttiness – blanched almonds and walnuts. It maybe lacks a little mid-palate delineation and definition in comparison to some of its august neighbours, but this is very fine. Strikingly juicy on the finish which is always a sign of quality – above all in 2024. 91-93
Clos du Marquis
Clos du Marquis (St Julien; 65% Cabernet Sauvignon; 30% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 32 hl/ha, reduced by the old vine and the selection of the grapes with some botrytis, the mildew well-managed; 7.6% vin de presse; IPT 69; pH 3.62; 12.9% alcohol; tasted twice, the first time at Chateau Nénin). A big step up in complexity from Le Petit Lion, with more layering and with the sheen of the layers more polished and interspersed here with fine glass-bead rollers – or so it seems. Ample in form with the fruit stretched more broadly than for Le Petit Lion but with every layer finely detailed and delineated. A considerable achievement even if its lacks a little of it customary density and compactness. Open-textured. There is no mistaking the slightly elevated acidity above all in comparison to the more solaire recent vintages, but there is also no mistaking the quality of the tannins and the gentleness of the extraction. 91-93
La Croix de Beaucaillou
La Croix de Beaucaillou (St Julien; 65% Merlot; 32% Cabernet Sauvignon; 3% Petit Verdot; IPT 80; a final yield of 22 hl/ha – with mildew on the Merlot, green harvesting of the Cabernet Sauvignon and some bleeding of the tanks; 14% alcohol; tasted with David Duran at the property). A lovely croquant dark berry fruit – blueberry, mulberry and bramble with a little plum too. Walnut shell. More and more cassis as one draws in the air. There’s less new oak here than usual and that works well, accentuating the sense of precision and the purity of the fruit. This is big, bold and quite voluptuous with quite a generous naturally sweet fruit. Punchy and crunchy too. The tannins are very present (just look at that IPT figure) and they help to structure this – entering between the layers and giving an expansive vertical range to the wine. 91-93
Le Pavillon de Léoville Poyferré
Le Pavillon de Léoville Poyferré (St Julien; tasted twice). Quite a step up from Moulin Riche in this vintage, with a more composed (if, at first, more closed and introvert) aromatic profile. But it’s much less dominated by the oak and rather more complex. Damsons, brambles and blackberries vie for attention and there’s already a pleasing presence of graphite and pencil shavings. A hint of peony with aeration. Quite plump and chewy on the palate with quite a volume of tannin still to resolve, but no dryness on the finish. 88-90
Le Petit Lion
Le Petit Lion (St Julien; 62% Merlot; 34% Cabernet Sauvignon; 4% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 31 hl/ha; 5.4% vin de presse; IPT 63; pH 3,52; 12.8% alcohol; tasted twice, the first time at Chateau Nénin). Glossy, creamy, nutty – we know immediately we’re in St Julien. Light and aerial. A very crisp and finely detailed red berry fruit – loganberry and raspberry. Simple in its way but very fine. Monotone I suppose but this is about the finesse and the purity and clarity of the fruit. The creamy texture is impressive and it helps the palate deal with the slightly elevated acidity. Juicy. Succulent. 88-90
Sarget de Gruaud Larose
Sarget de Gruaud Larose (St Julien; 48% Cabernet Sauvignon; 46% Merlot; 3% Petit Verdot; 3%; Cabernet Franc; pH 3.55; 12.5% alcohol; all from vines classified in 1855; tasted only once at the property). Very Gruaud. Quite luxuriant, with a very dark berry fruit. A little damson too. Cassis. This is fresh, vibrant, plump and with beautifully soft tannins. It has quite an ample frame but it is nicely filled. There’s a lovely pinch from the tannins. They are not quite as refined on the finish where the wine loses its shape just a little. This also lacks a bit of density in the mid-palate due to the ample frame. But there’s no mistaking, this is an excellent introduction to the grand vin even in a challenging vintage. 89-91+

Moulis-en-Médoc

Château Branas Grand-Poujeaux
Château Branas Grand-Poujeaux (Moulis-en-Médoc; 55% Cabernet Sauvignon; 35% Merlot; 10% Petit Verdot; 92% aging in oak barrels of which 50% are new, the rest in amphora; 13% alcohol; there’s a little less Merlot here because of the mildew). Not the easiest place to make wine in this vintage, with lots of mildew losses on important parcels – above all the Merlot. But there’s no sense of that in the wine itself, other than the more elevated level of Cabernet Sauvignon. This is reassuringly Branas in its richness, depth and sense of layering, even if it’s not as precise or focussed as the great recent vintages from here. But there’s a pleasing levity and an almost aerial quality to this that must have been difficult to achieve. I love the peppery notes that underscore the dark berry and cassis fruit and the natural sweet juiciness of the fruit. Graphite a plenty. Characteristically bold, the most powerful wine of the appellation in this vintage and probably the best. 91-93
Château Chasse-Spleen
Château Chasse-Spleen (Moulis-en-Médoc; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 33% Merlot; 7% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 40 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). This is nicely done, quite classical in its way with a dark stone fruit aromatics generously enrobed in graphite. Black cherries and brambles – picked just ripe. The frame is reasonably broad, certainly after tasting the Listrac wines, and the tannins are fine-grained and gentle, never quite crossing that fine line towards dryness. Reasonably plump and plush for the vintage. 89-91
Château Poujeaux
Château Poujeaux (Moulis-en-Médoc; 50% Cabernet Sauvignon; 35% Merlot; 15% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted three-time, the first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin, then again at the offices of a négociant and finally with Mathieu Cuvelier at Clos Fourtet). Quite nutty in its aromatic profile – usually a good sign of the ripeness of the pips – with dark berry fruits but little of the graphite or cedar of Chasse-Spleen, though a little more when re-tasted. Glossy and sleek on the palate, unusually so in fact for the vintage, and quite crystalline on the attack and opening, the extraction clearly very gentle. But you see why by the time you get to the finish where the acidity seem to gather and the tannins shade a little towards the dry-side. A little grainy on the finish. The Petit Verdot brings a green peppercorn note to this that helps sustain this on the finish. 88-90

Barsac

Château Broustet
Château Broustet (Barsac; 75% Sémillon; 15% Sauvignon Blanc; 10% Muscadelle; a final yield of just 6 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Very honeyed, very viscous, very saline but lacking in fruit complexity – confected peach and preserved peach and the signature confit lime of the vintage, peanut brittle too. A little like Bastor-Lamontagne, this has yet to discover its internal harmony – its sweet spot as you might say. For now it lacks complexity and feels rather heavy as a consequence. 88-90
Château Cantegril
Château Cantegril (Barsac; 100% Sémillon, unusually; 13.5% alcohol). This is lovely – and likely, as ever, to represent incredible value. Peanut brittle, apricot and peach flesh, white pear, a little fresh pineapple, beurre noisette and gladioli (really). Tense and charged with a racy acidity, this is less overtly sweet than most and that brings a fascinating sense of dynamism to the mid-palate with up-currants of fresh citrus cutting the rich and sweetness of the peach and apricot fruits. 91-93.
Château Climens
Château Climens (Barsac). Though a final decision has yet to be taken, for now it seems likely that there will be no grand vin in this vintage with the small quantity produced likely to be bottled as the second wine. The arrival of the autumn rain at the end of the season was the issue here
Château Doisy-Daëne
Château Doisy-Daëne (Barsac; 75% Sémillon; 25% Sauvignon Blanc; a final yield of 15 hl/ha; 12.5% alcohol; tasted twice, the second time at the UGC press tasting). Very true to the aromatic signature of Doisy-Daëne that I have in my head, so rather wonderful. This is honeyed gold in a glass. Saffron, wild field floral honey, pollen, Mirabelle, white melon, but all perfectly integrated and holistic making it rather difficult to capture in a string of descriptors. There’s a little fresh ginger and ginger ale – notes I associate more with Doisy-Dubroca in fact (a wine I have yet to taste in this vintage). The palate is gorgeous in its complexity. It’s broad and rich and intensely viscous but there’s a tonne of freshness here – in the form of freshly squeezed lime juice and lime zest trickling vertically downwards like ‘tears’ down the side of a glass. Super-sapid and increasingly saline on the finish and very long as a consequence. 94-96
Château Doisy-Dubroca
Château Doisy-Dubroca (Barsac). Whilst a tiny quantity of this wine has been produced, it was not shown en primeur. Not yet tasted
Château Doisy-Védrines
Château Doisy-Védrines (Barsac; 84% Sémillon; 14% Sauvignon Blanc; 3% Muscadelle; a final yield of 9 hl/ha; 125 g/L of residual sugar; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Very sticky and, for me, lacking the freshness that brings life to the best of these. Roasted pineapple and fleur de sel, a little saffron, toasted almonds and frangipane. Honeyed but lacking a little botrytis character, this is not quite what I imagined it would be. I’d like to re-taste, but I find this a little disappointing at this early stage. 91-93
L’Extravagant de Château Doisy-Daëne
L’Extravagant de Château Doisy-Daëne (Barsac; 100% Sauvignon Blanc; 13.5% alcohol). It’s always a treat to taste this, and this is amazing. I notice first, and of all things, peanuts, salted peanut brittle and grilled sesame seeds – really! There’s also butterscotch (of course), floral honey (of course), seared and roasted pineapple, pink grapefruit zest, fresh ginger, ginger cordial, and Mandarin orange peel. And now you come to mention it, candyfloss, rosewater, rose Turkish delight and lemon meringue pie … And now we’re back to, you’ve guessed it, peanut butter! The viscosity and sugar levels are off the roof and even by L’Extravagent’s standards this is extravagant and singular. It’s difficult to rate because it’s difficult to compare it with anything else. But let me try 96-98

Lalande-de-Pomerol

Château Canon Chaigneau
Château Canon Chaigneau (Lalande-de-Pomerol; 98% Merlot; 1% Cabernet Franc; 1% Malbec; 14% alcohol). Reassuringly familiar, I think I would pick this blind. There’s a little more intensity to this than the Cuve 8a, a very slightly broader frame and rather more layering and mid-palate density. That actually makes this brighter, crisper and more precise and energetic on the attack, but it also serves to draw more attention to the slightly elevated acidity on the finish. Interestingly, the ferrous minerality from the crasse de fer is also more evident. 89-91
Château Canon Chaigneau Cuve 1a
Château Canon Chaigneau Cuve 1a (Lalande-de-Pomerol; 100% Cabernet Franc; 14% alcohol). Light and aerial with a lovely very fresh, crisp blueberry fruit. We could almost be in Chinon! This is simple but engaging and quite creamy on the attack. But there’s no mistaking the somewhat slender frame and the lack of density in the mid-palate when compared to the grand vin (or, indeed, to previous vintages). But it’s authentic, engaging and a study in Cabernet Franc purity! 87-89
Château Canon Chaigneau Cuve 8a
Château Canon Chaigneau Cuve 8a (Lalande-de-Pomerol; 99% Merlot; 1% Malbec; 13.5% alcohol). Quite nutty aromatically, with walnut and blanched almond notes accompanying the dark plum and berry fruit, with a little sage and bay leaf. Pure and focussed and with quite a pleasant natural sweetness to the fruit at least on the attack. The acidity picks up towards the finish, but this has been well-managed. 88-90

Canon-Fronsac

Château Canon Pécresse
Château Canon Pécresse (Canon-Fronsac; 70% Merlot; 30% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.5; 13% alcohol; Julien Viaud is the consultant here; certified organic and practicing biodynamic viticulture). A little more volume, plushness and richness than many with a pleasingly ample palate of dark berry and stone fruits. The acidity is definitely a little elevated in comparison with recent vintages, but it’s well managed and well incorporated. One of the best wines of this sector undoubtedly in 2024. 87-89

Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux

Château Cap de Faugères
Château Cap de Faugères (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; 85% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; 5% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 45.5 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol; tasted at Faugères with Vincent Cruége). Nicely smoky with a deep, dark plummy fruit, plenty of expressive cassis notes too and a touch of wild herbs. Creamily textured, as is already evident from the aromatics – always an excellent sign. Bright, crisp and crunchy, with fresh red and dark berry fruits – cranberry, redcurrant, white current and black current. A narrow frame, a great purity and precision and a finish elongated by the work of the limestone tannins. Rippling and sapid to the end. Accessible and extremely juicy. 89-91+
Château d’Aiguilhe
Château d’Aiguilhe (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; 90% Merlot; 10% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 38hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted at Canon-La-Gaffelière with Stephan and Ludovic von Neipperg). Creamy. Black berry and fruits of the forest. Damsons and damson skin, with the little touch of tannin from the limestone terroir. A lovely dark fruit signature. Again, wild herbal notes – rosemary and thyme. Ample. Silky and crystalline. Quite gracious and yet authentic, with its chewy crumbly limestone tannins 89-91
Château Joanin Bécot
Château Joanin Bécot (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; 80% Merlot: 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 34 hl/ha; pH 3.5; 13.3% alcohol). Tasted at the property from a glass still warm from the washer, which didn’t help. Blackcurrant and a little bramble. A little hint of walnut and with a certain creaminess that comes from that. Vertical from the limestone terroir that is the star of the show here. More and more black currant with a little aeration – or, simply, time. Sapid, juicy, tight and tense, with a narrow frame, very sleek and slender but fully packed with croquant juicy sapid fruits. Tender and chewy in a very tactile way on the finish, but with never any hint of dryness or astringency. Neither the complexity nor the richness of recent vintages, but accessible and engaging. 89-91
Château Le Rey Les Argileuses
Château Le Rey Les Argileuses (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; the green and blue clay parcel plots from Le Rey; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; pH 3.4; 13% alcohol; just put in bottle; tasted at Bellefont-Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Very mineral, very pure, impressively layered and very precise. Wonderfully crystalline. Simple but incredibly pure and so expressive of its terroir. 90-92
Château Le Rey Les Rocheuses
Château Le Rey Les Rocheuses (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; the limestone parcel plots from Le Rey; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; a final yiel of 31 hl/ha; pH 3.3; 13% alcohol; tasted at Bellefont-Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). The Cabernet Franc really signs so eloquently here. Gorgeously pure and, again, hyper-crystalline in texture. Sapid and lithe and sinuous and brilliantly expressive of this terroir and, indeed, this terroir type. Buy this, put it alongside the Argileuses cuvée and start the conversation! Great. 91-93+
Château Montlandrie
Château Montlandrie (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; 60% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon; aging in oak barrels, 42% new; 13% alcohol; tasted with Noëmie Durantou at L’Eglise Clinet). Gorgeous aromatically. Black cherry. Blueberry. Bramble. Quite subtle, with a little hint of florality – peony and wisteria – and a rather gracious quite intense dark berry fruit signature. A touch of damson skin too and the slight hint of tannin with it. Dense and compact, vividly juicy from the attack, the fruit in the mouth a little redder and more vibrant in hue. That gives this a lovely racy sense of energy and vivacity. There’s great finesse on the finish from the touch and sculpting of the wine by the calcaire tannins. 92-94
Clos Lunelles
Clos Lunelles (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; 70% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc; 10% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 25.1 hl/ha; pH 3.44; 13.9% alcohol; tasted at Château Pavie). A lovely lifted dark berry fruit – very fresh but pure and precise and intense. Bravo. I love the vertical lift that seems to come from the limestone terroir here and the gently hint of florality. Intense and quite rich and compact for the vintage but above all aerial. Lovely black cherries on the palate with a little blueberry. Pure, focussed, but dense and compact too. Creamy at first, before the engagement of the crumbly limestone tannins that twist and squeeze this on the finish. Excellent. 91-93
L’Aurage
L’Aurage (Castillon Côtes de Bordeaux; 13.5% alcohol). Toasty. A slightly confit fruit. Figs, fresh and dried. Dried flowers. Plums and baked plums. A little nutmeg and cinnamon. Sweet-scented on the attack and fluid and dynamic over the palate. Fresh and bright, this works very well in its style. Not massive in terms of extraction and more interesting for that. Lithe and tender on the finish. 89-91

Graves

Château Chantegrive
Château Chantegrive (Graves; 58% Merlot; 40% Cabernet Sauvignon; 2% Petit Verdot; a final yield of 32 hl/ha; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Quite floral. Rich and plump in the context of the vintage and impressively creamy. Nicely managed, this is not ample on the attack but not too strict either, the tannins reining in the plummy fruit and drawing it to the spine. Quite long with the tannins shading drier towards the finish. 87-89.
Château Chantegrive Cuvée Caroline
Château Chantegrive Cuvée Caroline (Graves; 50% Sémillon; 50% Sauvignon Blanc). This is always a step up from the larger volume production standard bottling, usually because of the greater selection and the additional oak influence. Here it’s much more about the former and also the greater proportion of Sémillon in the blend. Peach, apricot skin and those lovely crunchy gooseberry and white currant notes from the standard white bottling. Beaswax, honey and a slight -esque note too. Likely to be great value as ever. 89-91
Château Ferrande
Château Ferrande (Graves; 45% Cabernet Sauvignon; 55% Merlot; pH 3.67; 13% alcohol; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin; Thomas Duclos is the consultant here; certified organic). More lifted aromatically than de Chategrive, less relaxed, more taut and more herbal too. Less creamy. Red and darker berries, cherries and sandalwood. A little oaky when re-tasted but with a nice crystallinity. Rather stern on the attack, but there is a pulpiness to the fruit that I rather like and even a hint of graphite in the midst of the mid-palate. Quite glossy and shapely. A success in the context of the vintage. 88-90
Clos Floridène
Clos Floridène (Graves; 60% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 13% alcohol). Quite plush, soft and gentle, yet ample and generous – much like the white in fact in its form in the mouth. There’s impressive detail and precision and some layering, but no great terroir complexity to reveal. But this very fine for the likely price-point and it shows an excellent management of the vintage. 87-89
Clos Floridène blanc
Clos Floridène blanc (Graves; 55% Sémillon; 45% Sauvignon Blanc; 13% alcohol). Ample on the attack and layered, almost like a cascading cliff face made of well-defined vertical strata, each here interspersed with juicy, sapid confit and freshly squeezed citrus notes. Radiant and luxurious in its precision and in its glassy mid-palate this is likely to prove exceptional value – not for the first time. 90-92
Villa Bel-Air
Villa Bel-Air (Graves; 52.5% Cabernet Sauvignon; 44% Merlot; 3.5% Cabernet Franc; 12.5% alcohol). This is really nicely done. It expresses the vintage very well, retaining levity, energy and brightness without ever succumbing to tartness or astringency. There’s even a little creaminess. Crucially, there’s no dryness on the finish and this expresses its terroir and appellation very well with a subtle meatiness, a hint of oak smoke and plenty of dark stone and berry fruits. 88-90

Lussac St-Emilion

Château Courlat Cuvée Jean-Baptiste
Château Courlat Cuvée Jean-Baptiste (Lussac St-Emilion; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 33 hl/ha after densimetric sorting; pH 3.5; 30% new oak; tasted at Clos du Clocher). Lush and full, and nicely mouth-filling. There’s a little ferrous note to the minerality. Dark plummy fruits. Brambles. A little florality. The Rpulse extraction really helps here, above all texturally. A touch of chocolate. Full and crystalline, with lovely grippy tannins. Very impressive. Crumbly and chalky on the finish. 89-91

Fronsac

Château de Carles
Château de Carles (Fronsac). A wine I often love, and 2024 is no exception. This is very sleek and stylish, clear, precise and well-focussed with a brightness and a clarity that is rare in any vintage, particularly this one. The tannins are very fine-grained and have a lovely beady limestone character. They bring detail and delineation. Tender and fresh, this is an excellent wine with some aging potential that will be accessible from the moment it’s in bottle. 90-92
Château Fontenil
Château Fontenil (Fronsac; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 19 hl/ha; 14% alcohol; Michel Rolland’s family property). I rather like this. It’s very pure and very linear and quite aerial in its Fronsac signature – very true to and expressive of its terroir and appellation. An intense blueberry and bramble fruit, a little walnut shell and with a hint of the tannins of the walnut’s skin, this is crisp on the attack and crumbly and textured on the finish. If you still need to be disabused of the idea that Michel Rolland is all about wood, taste this! 91-93
Château La Dauphine
Château La Dauphine (Fronsac; 75% Merlot; 25% Cabernet Franc; pH 3.5; 13% alcohol; certified organic and biodynamic; Julien Viaud is the consultant here). Creamy, fresh, pure and engaging aromatically, as it always is, the gentleness of the extraction coming in part from the use of the Rpulse system (as for instance at Brane Cantenac). This is perhaps a little introvert at first. Fruits of the forest and wild herbal notes, almost a touch of heather and whiff of iodine. I love the small dark berries that seem to explode in the mid-palate. Cool without ever being austere, this is vivid, racy and lively. 90-92+
Château Les Trois Croix
Château Les Trois Croix (Fronsac). Lifted and bright and crunchy with bunches of freshly picked red berries – strawberries and raspberries. There’s a nice sense of harmony and precision. Simple, accessible and very fruit forward, this will make of early drinking and bring plenty of pleasure. I like the grainy calcaire tannins on the finish, giving this additional length. 87-89.
Haut-Carles (Château de Carles)
Haut-Carles (Château de Carles) (Fronsac). Just a little fuller, a little more plush and a little more sumptuous than de Carles which is already excellent. This, I presume, sees a little more oak too. It’s more serious and more age-worthy, but very much cut from the same cloth – and out of the same limestone quarry! The tannins are the key ingredient here. This is authentic Fronsac and very architectural in form as a consequence 91-93

Listrac-Médoc

Château Fonréaud
Château Fonréaud (Listrac-Médoc; 55% Cabernet Sauvignon; 40% Merlot; 5% Petit Verdot; tasted twice, first at the UGC press tasting at the Cité du Vin). Very ‘Listrac’, with an almost lime character to its minerality and the lift and crumbly tannins than come from the limestone sous-sol. Dark berries and damsons, a little thyme too, this is appealing aromatically and also has a nice evolution over the palate. The tannins will need a little time to resolve, but they are ripe and this is quite a good result in the context of the vintage, confirmed when re-tasted at the UGC press tasting. 87-89

Bordeaux Supérieur

Château Grand Village
Château Grand Village (Bordeaux Supérieur; 88% Merlot; 12% Bouchet; around 40-42 hl/ha; c. 13.2% alcohol; tasted with Ormi Ram and Baptiste Guinaudeau at Lafleur). Bright, crisp and with very crunchy red berry fruits, all beautifully al dente. There’s a very distinct earthy, clay-y, minerality too. Very pure and quite lifted, aromatically and structurally. The acidity is electrifying here, rendering this energetic, taut and tense. Very long and linear on the finish, with a delicate florality at the back of the palate. 92-94.
Les Perrières de Lafleur
Les Perrières de Lafleur (Bordeaux Supérieur; 20% Merlot; 80% Bouchet; a final yield of around 40-42 hl/ha; tasted with Ormi Ram and Baptiste Guinaudeau at Lafleur). A little darker in its fruit profile, more dense and intense. The Bouchet really sings. This is very bulby in its florality. Peony and iris. Loganberry and blueberry. It is very true to its calcaire terroir too – a study in limestone, above all in this vintage! Sumptuous and that brilliant integration of the freshness and the limestone tannins. As pure a terroir influence in a wine as it is possible to imagine. A wine that almost re-defines what purity means. Very linear, very chiselled and very structural. 93-95

Lalande de Pomerol

Château Le Fleur de Boüard
Château Le Fleur de Boüard (Lalande de Pomerol). This is excellent. I love the purity and ripeness and precision of the fruit here – it reminds you how much you miss that in some of these wines. There’s a vivid clarity to this which is energising in a vintage in which so many wines are a little cloudy and indistinct in the mid-palate. Easy, accessible, bright and crunchy and likely to represent excellent value. 91-93
Château Les Cruzelles
Château Les Cruzelles (Lalande de Pomerol; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; aging in oak barrels, 57% new; 13.6% alcohol; tasted with Noëmie Durantou at L’Eglise Clinet). Ferrous in its minerality at first as ever. Gracious, quite ample, refined and with the same crystallinity that is present in all of these wines. But again, crucially, without the sensation of the fruit being stretched thinly over the structure. Dark berry fruits and plenty of blueberries from the Cabernet Franc. Some black cherries rounding this out after gentle aeration. Quite lush and plush with a juicy but rich finish that is very satisfying. Recommended. 91-93
Domaine de Gachet
Domaine de Gachet (Lalande de Pomerol; 100% Merlot; 13% alcohol; tasted with François Estager at La Cabanne). More iron rich than the other wines in the portfolio and the fruit a bit redder in hue. Strawberries with red plums and plum skins. More juicy still on the palate. Easy and accessible but succulent, the wide frame accentuating the clarity of the mid-palate. 87-89
Enclos de Viaud
Enclos de Viaud (Lalande de Pomerol; 100% Merlot; a final yield of 22 hl/ha; pH 3.6; 13% alcohol; tasted at Bellefont Belcier with Emmanuelle Fulchi and Jean-Christophe Meyrou). Saline, with a distinctly ferrous touch to the minerality. Authentic plum and dark berry fruits, a little raspberry too. Very fine-grained tannins, showing the gentle extract – the Vignobles K signature. Fresh and quite delicate. Nicely managed. Light, of course, but that’s the right thing to do here. 87-89
La Chenade
La Chenade (Lalande de Pomerol; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; aging in oak barrels, 52% new; 13.3% alcohol; tasted with Noëmie Durantou at L’Eglise Clinet). Dustier in its earthy minerality than the other wines in the line-up, with less of the ferrous note that it sometimes has. A bright, plump and sapid berry fruit. There’s a pleasing sense of harmony and balance. This is more like Saintayme in its levity and the form it takes in the mouth than the more serious and richer, darker-fruited, Les Cruzelles. There’s great prospective value to be found here! Noëmie has crafted an excellent wine in the context of the vintage. 90-92+
Le Plus de la Fleur de Boüard
Le Plus de la Fleur de Boüard (Lalande de Pomerol). Almost a little Valandraud-like in style, with the sleek use of oak – much more so than in La Fleur itself – reinforcing the floral character of the vintage and bringing out the violet-enrobed black cherries that are the star attraction here. Incense too and patchouli. Dark, rich, soft and velvety but at the same time lifted and quite ethereal, this transcends the limits of the vintage rather well. I imagine that the yield is tiny and the selection very strict. 92-94

Bordeaux

Château Reignac
Château Reignac (Bordeaux; 65% Merlot; 5% Cabernet Franc; 30% Cabernet Sauvignon; a final yield of 30 hl/ha; Michel Rolland is the consultant). Intriguing, with red and darker cherries, cherry stone and crushed dark berry fruits, a little espresso coffee bean too. This is glossy, limpid and quite lithe on the palate, yet at the same time very linear. A nice sense of balance and just on the right side of becoming austere. A tad dry on the finish, but less so than many. 87-89.

Côtes de Bourg

Domaine de Cambes
Domaine de Cambes (Côtes de Bourg; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Franc). Very toasty. A little richer, a little more sapid and fresh on the palate, but still with the very evident signature of the Radoux blend casks. A narrow frame packed with fresh fruits. Linear, long and with a slowly tapering finish. The sucrosity from the oak is well-tempered by the freshness of the berry and, above all, stone fruits. 90-92
Roc de Cambes
Roc de Cambes (Côtes de Bourg; 80% Merlot; 20% Cabernet Sauvignon). A little less toasted, more plump and the fruit is fresher and less dominated by the oak and toast-of-the-oak signature of Domaine de Cambes and L’Aurage. Dark berry fruits are much more evident here. It’s nuttier too. A little fig and black pepper. Broader in frame and more spherical in form. Toasty notes emerge towards the lifted finish. Very ‘Mitjavile’! 91-93

Montagne Saint-Emilion

Vieux Château Saint André
Vieux Château Saint André (Montagne Saint-Emilion; 85% Merlot; 15% Cabernet Franc; from 4 hectates on clay and limestone; a final yield of 35 hl/ha; 13.5% alcohol). This is a wine that was sent to me in Paris that I would not otherwise have tasted. Shame on me. It’s brilliant and it shows what is possible in a vintage like this. OK, it’s made by the Berrouet family (more famous for their exploits in Pomerol – think ‘blue clay’!). But not even that prepares you for how good this is. Reductive at first, this takes it times to open in the glass and requires a bit of patience. When it does it has the most picture-perfect aromatic signature of fresh ripe raspberry and loganberry – one can almost sense the hairs on the delicate surface of the fruit. And they bring the hairs on the back of my neck to attention. Indeed, texturally we have something very similar with, at first, the sculpting of a broad and ample, soft and luxuriant frame with, then, the delicate, fine and powdery yet pointy tannins gripping at the edges and almost folding freshness into the mid-palate like a baker kneading bread. Fresh, pure, soft and enticing, yet tactile and dynamic, this is a very eloquent and rather beautiful expression of the vintage. 92-94

It looks like you're in Asia, would you like to be redirected to the Drinks Business Asia edition?

Yes, take me to the Asia edition No

The Drinks Business
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.